Tripathi Sandeep, Hafzalah Mina, Harthan Aaron A, Wang Yanzhi, Patel Priti M, Welty Maureen E, Subramanian Sujata
J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2021;26(6):584-591. doi: 10.5863/1551-6776-26.6.584. Epub 2021 Aug 16.
The Glenn procedure may lead to the development of elevated cerebral venous pressures, which is believed to result in "Glenn headaches." This manifests as excessive irritability, often requiring significant use of opioids and benzodiazepines. This study was designed to report our experience with the use of phenobarbital in the postoperative phase after the Glenn procedure.
We performed a retrospective chart review to compare Glenn patients before and after implementation of a sedation protocol using phenobarbital. The 2 groups were compared for demographics, surgical characteristics, and cumulative sedation usage. Correlation coefficients between the preoperative catheterization variables and sedation usage were also calculated.
Groups A (pre-phenobarbital; n = 8) and B (post-phenobarbital; n = 11) were comparable in terms of demographics, cardiac anatomy, preoperative catheterization data, and hemodynamics. Patients in Group B received a median dose of 21.8 mg/kg of phenobarbital during their ICU stay. Although there was a decreased administration of morphine equivalents (2.60 mg/kg vs 2.25 mg/kg, p = 0.38), benzodiazepine (0.1 mg/kg vs 0.074 mg/kg, p = 0.43), and dexmedetomidine (47 mcg/kg vs 37.2 mcg/kg, p = 0.53) in Group B, the differences were not statistically significant. There was also no strong correlation between preoperative hemodynamic variables and the postoperative sedation requirement, and there was no statistically significant difference in overall outcomes between the 2 groups.
While phenobarbital may have mitigated the use of opioids, benzodiazepines, and alpha-agonist agents in some postoperative Glenn patients, the overall findings for all patients were not statistically significant. Further prospective studies are needed to ascertain the role of phenobarbital in these patients.
格林分流术可能导致脑静脉压升高,据信这会引发“格林分流性头痛”。其表现为过度烦躁,常需大量使用阿片类药物和苯二氮䓬类药物。本研究旨在报告我们在格林分流术后使用苯巴比妥的经验。
我们进行了一项回顾性病历审查,以比较在实施使用苯巴比妥的镇静方案前后的格林分流术患者。比较两组患者的人口统计学特征、手术特点和累计镇静药物使用情况。还计算了术前导管插入术变量与镇静药物使用之间的相关系数。
A组(使用苯巴比妥前;n = 8)和B组(使用苯巴比妥后;n = 11)在人口统计学特征、心脏解剖结构、术前导管插入术数据和血流动力学方面具有可比性。B组患者在重症监护病房住院期间接受的苯巴比妥中位剂量为21.8 mg/kg。虽然B组吗啡等效剂量(2.60 mg/kg对2.25 mg/kg,p = 0.38)、苯二氮䓬类药物(0.1 mg/kg对0.074 mg/kg,p = 0.43)和右美托咪定(47 mcg/kg对37.2 mcg/kg,p = 0.53)的使用有所减少,但差异无统计学意义。术前血流动力学变量与术后镇静需求之间也没有强相关性,两组患者的总体结局也没有统计学显著差异。
虽然苯巴比妥可能在一些格林分流术后患者中减少了阿片类药物、苯二氮䓬类药物和α激动剂的使用,但所有患者的总体结果无统计学意义。需要进一步的前瞻性研究来确定苯巴比妥在这些患者中的作用。