Hayes Kaleen N, Gomes Tara, Tadrous Mina
Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Aug 6;12:709349. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.709349. eCollection 2021.
Traditional methods to standardize exposures in pharmacoepidemiologic studies, like defined daily-doses, may be inadequate to capture drug class effects when there are many in-class medications, formulations, and administration routes. Antipsychotic medications are one example of a drug class with these complexities. Direct dose conversion methods are pharmacologically-based but often overlooked, potentially for lack of real-world guidance and examples of their implementation. The purpose of this article is to describe a method to implement dose conversion, using an example study that quantifies antipsychotic use among a cohort of older adults with dementia. We identified 45,442 older adults (aged ≥66 years) with dementia initiating antipsychotic therapy between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2012 in Ontario, Canada using linked administrative healthcare databases. We developed and applied a data cleaning and dose conversion algorithm to quantify antipsychotic exposure in chlorpromazine dose equivalents at initiation, month 6, and month 12 of therapy. Results were stratified by route of administration. At initiation, 14% of patients received multiple antipsychotic prescriptions simultaneously. Patients initiating regular injectable and multiple administration routes received the highest median chlorpromazine equivalent daily-doses. Data cleaning changed 3, 16, 36, and 42% of total equivalent daily-doses in patients initiating oral, regular injectable, long-acting injectable, and multiple administration routes, respectively. Dose conversion of prescription claims data was a feasible method to quantify and present antipsychotic drug exposures. Dose conversion methods can be considered for drug effects studies of antipsychotic therapies and other medication classes with complex use.
在药物流行病学研究中,用于标准化暴露量的传统方法,如限定日剂量法,在同一药物类别中存在多种药物、剂型和给药途径时,可能不足以捕捉药物类别效应。抗精神病药物就是具有这些复杂性的药物类别的一个例子。直接剂量转换方法基于药理学原理,但常常被忽视,这可能是因为缺乏实际应用指导和实施范例。本文的目的是描述一种实施剂量转换的方法,并通过一项实例研究来量化一组老年痴呆患者的抗精神病药物使用情况。我们利用加拿大安大略省相关的行政医疗保健数据库,识别出在2009年1月1日至2012年12月31日期间开始接受抗精神病治疗的45442名年龄≥66岁的老年痴呆患者。我们开发并应用了一种数据清理和剂量转换算法,以量化治疗开始时、第6个月和第12个月以氯丙嗪剂量当量表示的抗精神病药物暴露量。结果按给药途径进行分层。在治疗开始时,14%的患者同时接受了多种抗精神病药物处方。开始接受常规注射和多种给药途径的患者接受的氯丙嗪当量日剂量中位数最高。数据清理分别改变了开始接受口服、常规注射、长效注射和多种给药途径的患者的总当量日剂量的3%、16%、36%和42%。处方报销数据的剂量转换是量化和呈现抗精神病药物暴露量的一种可行方法。对于抗精神病治疗及其他使用复杂的药物类别的药物效应研究,可以考虑使用剂量转换方法。