Tokai Gakuin University.
Senshu University.
J Psychol. 2021;155(8):717-737. doi: 10.1080/00223980.2021.1956871. Epub 2021 Aug 23.
Previous research on the relationship between rumination and behavioral impulsivity has been limited because impulsivity was assessed by using individual tasks. This study examined the concurrent associations of a latent variable named impulsive action with rumination and depression to alleviate the task-impurity problem and the low reliability of laboratory tasks assessing impulsivity. This study also examined whether stressors mediated the association between impulsive action and rumination. University students in Japan ( = 176) conducted three laboratory tasks assessing impulsive action: the Go/No-Go Task, the Stop Signal Task, and the Conners Continuous Performance Test 3rd Edition. They also completed self-report measures of rumination, stressors, and depression. Results indicated that the latent variable named impulsive action constructed from the performance in these three tasks was positively associated with rumination. Moreover, stressors mediated this association. Also, impulsive action was positively associated with depression the increase in stressors and rumination. These findings and those of previous studies examining associations between rumination and self-reported impulsivity suggest that impulsivity might be a determinant of rumination.
先前关于反刍思维和行为冲动性之间关系的研究受到限制,因为冲动性是通过使用个体任务来评估的。本研究通过同时考察一个名为冲动行为的潜在变量与反刍思维和抑郁之间的关系,以缓解任务不纯和实验室任务评估冲动性的可靠性低的问题。本研究还检验了应激源是否在冲动行为与反刍思维之间的关系中起中介作用。日本的大学生(n=176)进行了三项评估冲动行为的实验室任务:Go/No-Go 任务、停止信号任务和康纳斯连续绩效测试第 3 版。他们还完成了反刍思维、应激源和抑郁的自我报告测量。结果表明,由这三个任务的表现构建的名为冲动行为的潜在变量与反刍思维呈正相关。此外,应激源在这一关联中起中介作用。同时,冲动行为与抑郁呈正相关,即应激源和反刍思维的增加。这些发现和先前研究中检验反刍思维与自我报告冲动性之间关系的发现表明,冲动性可能是反刍思维的一个决定因素。