• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在未进行活检的患者中,使用磁共振成像和经直肠超声融合靶向前列腺活检联合诊断前列腺癌的准确性。

The accuracy of prostate cancer diagnosis in biopsy-naive patients using combined magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasound fusion-targeted prostate biopsy.

作者信息

Uno Hiromi, Taniguchi Tomoki, Seike Kensaku, Kato Daiki, Takai Manabu, Iinuma Koji, Horie Kengo, Nakane Keita, Koie Takuya

机构信息

Department of Urology, Chuno Kosei Hospital, Seki, Japan.

Department of Urology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan.

出版信息

Transl Androl Urol. 2021 Jul;10(7):2982-2989. doi: 10.21037/tau-21-250.

DOI:10.21037/tau-21-250
PMID:34430401
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8350232/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to estimate whether multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)-transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) fusion biopsy (FUS-TB) increases the detection rates of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) compared with TRUS-guided systematic biopsy (TRUS-GB).

METHODS

This retrospective study focused on patients who underwent mpMRI before prostate biopsy (PB) with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADS v2) scores ≥3 and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level between 2.5 and 20 ng/mL. Before FUS-TB, the biopsy needle position was checked virtually using three-dimensional mapping. After confirming the position of the target within the prostate, biopsy needle was inserted and PB was performed. Suspicious lesions were generally targeted with 2 to 4 cores. Subsequently, 10-12 cores were biopsied for TRUS-GB. The primary endpoint was the PCa detection rate (PCDR) for patients with PCa who underwent combined FUS-TB and TRUS-GB.

RESULTS

According to PI-RADS v2, 76.7% of the patients with PI-RADS v2 score ≥3 were diagnosed with PCa. The PCDRs in patients with PI-RADS v2 score of 4 or 5 were significantly higher than those in patients with PI-RADS v2 score of 3 (3 . 4, P<0.001; 3 . 5, P<0.001; 4 . 5, P=0.073). According to PCDR, the detection rates of PCa and csPCa in the FUS-TB were significantly higher than that in the TRUS-GB.

CONCLUSIONS

Following detection of suspicious tumor lesions on mpMRI, FUS-TB use detects a higher number of PCa cases compared with TRUS-GB.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)-经直肠超声(TRUS)融合活检(FUS-TB)与TRUS引导下系统活检(TRUS-GB)相比,是否能提高临床显著性前列腺癌(csPCa)的检出率。

方法

本回顾性研究聚焦于前列腺活检(PB)前接受mpMRI检查、前列腺影像报告和数据系统第2版(PI-RADS v2)评分≥3且前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平在2.5至20 ng/mL之间的患者。在进行FUS-TB之前,使用三维映射虚拟检查活检针位置。在确认前列腺内目标位置后,插入活检针并进行PB。可疑病变通常取2至4针活检。随后,对TRUS-GB取10至12针活检。主要终点是接受FUS-TB和TRUS-GB联合检查的前列腺癌患者的前列腺癌检出率(PCDR)。

结果

根据PI-RADS v2,PI-RADS v2评分≥3的患者中有76.7%被诊断为前列腺癌。PI-RADS v2评分为4或5的患者的PCDR显著高于PI-RADS v2评分为3的患者(3.4,P<0.001;3.5,P<0.001;4.5,P=0.073)。根据PCDR,FUS-TB中前列腺癌和csPCa的检出率显著高于TRUS-GB。

结论

在mpMRI上检测到可疑肿瘤病变后,与TRUS-GB相比,使用FUS-TB能检测出更多前列腺癌病例。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8abd/8350232/ef48cbe6053e/tau-10-07-2982-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8abd/8350232/d2f76bef181a/tau-10-07-2982-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8abd/8350232/ef48cbe6053e/tau-10-07-2982-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8abd/8350232/d2f76bef181a/tau-10-07-2982-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8abd/8350232/ef48cbe6053e/tau-10-07-2982-f2.jpg

相似文献

1
The accuracy of prostate cancer diagnosis in biopsy-naive patients using combined magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasound fusion-targeted prostate biopsy.在未进行活检的患者中,使用磁共振成像和经直肠超声融合靶向前列腺活检联合诊断前列腺癌的准确性。
Transl Androl Urol. 2021 Jul;10(7):2982-2989. doi: 10.21037/tau-21-250.
2
Comparison of prostate cancer detection rates between magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy and transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy according to Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System in patients with PSA ≥4 ng/mL: a systematic review and meta-analysis.根据前列腺影像报告和数据系统,对PSA≥4 ng/mL患者进行磁共振成像靶向活检与经直肠超声引导活检的前列腺癌检出率比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Transl Androl Urol. 2019 Dec;8(6):741-753. doi: 10.21037/tau.2019.12.03.
3
A Prospective Comparison of Transrectal Standard, Cognitive, Transperineal Fusion, and Mapping Prostate Biopsy for Cancer Detection.经直肠标准、认知、经会阴融合和前列腺癌检测图谱活检的前瞻性比较。
J Endourol. 2023 Aug;37(8):940-947. doi: 10.1089/end.2022.0780. Epub 2023 Jun 27.
4
Comparing Three Different Techniques for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsies: A Systematic Review of In-bore versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging-transrectal Ultrasound fusion versus Cognitive Registration. Is There a Preferred Technique?比较三种不同的磁共振成像靶向前列腺活检技术:腔内与磁共振成像-经直肠超声融合与认知配准的系统评价。哪种技术更优?
Eur Urol. 2017 Apr;71(4):517-531. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.07.041. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
5
Prospective randomized trial comparing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided in-bore biopsy to MRI-ultrasound fusion and transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in patients with prior negative biopsies.前瞻性随机临床试验比较了磁共振成像(MRI)引导的腔内活检与 MRI-超声融合和经直肠超声引导的前列腺活检在先前阴性活检患者中的应用。
Eur Urol. 2015 Oct;68(4):713-20. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.008. Epub 2015 Jun 23.
6
Transrectal ultrasound examination of prostate cancer guided by fusion imaging of multiparametric MRI and TRUS: avoiding unnecessary mpMRI-guided targeted biopsy.多参数 MRI 与 TRUS 融合成像引导经直肠前列腺癌超声检查:避免不必要的 mpMRI 引导靶向活检。
Asian J Androl. 2023 May-Jun;25(3):410-415. doi: 10.4103/aja202276.
7
Association Between Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Score for the Index Lesion and Multifocal, Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)评分与指数病变和多灶性、临床显著前列腺癌的相关性。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2018 May;1(1):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.01.002. Epub 2018 May 15.
8
Transperineal Versus Transrectal MRI/TRUS Fusion Targeted Biopsy: Detection Rate of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.经会阴与经直肠MRI/TRUS融合靶向活检:临床显著性前列腺癌的检出率
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2017 Feb;15(1):e33-e36. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2016.07.007. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
9
Comparison of Cancer Detection Rates Between TRUS-Guided Biopsy and MRI-Targeted Biopsy According to PSA Level in Biopsy-Naive Patients: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.在初次活检的患者中,根据 PSA 水平比较 TRUS 引导下活检与 MRI 靶向活检的癌症检出率:倾向评分匹配分析。
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2019 Feb;17(1):e19-e25. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2018.09.007. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
10
Is There Still a Need for Repeated Systematic Biopsies in Patients with Previous Negative Biopsies in the Era of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsies of the Prostate?在磁共振成像引导下前列腺靶向活检的时代,对于之前活检阴性的患者,是否仍需要重复进行系统性活检?
Eur Urol Oncol. 2020 Apr;3(2):216-223. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2019.06.005. Epub 2019 Jun 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Advances and Challenges in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: A Comprehensive Review.前列腺癌诊断的进展与挑战:全面综述
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jun 25;17(13):2137. doi: 10.3390/cancers17132137.
2
Is prostatic adenocarcinoma detectable by urine cytology-A multicenter retrospective review.尿细胞学检查能否检测出前列腺腺癌——一项多中心回顾性研究
Prostate. 2025 Jan;85(1):97-104. doi: 10.1002/pros.24805. Epub 2024 Oct 14.
3
Discrepancy in the Location of Prostate Cancer Indicated on Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Pathologically Diagnosed Using Surgical Specimens.

本文引用的文献

1
Positive Predictive Value of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.前列腺影像报告和数据系统第 2 版检测临床显著前列腺癌的阳性预测值:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2021 Oct;4(5):697-713. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2020.12.004. Epub 2020 Dec 25.
2
Contrast-enhanced transrectal ultrasound can reduce collection of unnecessary biopsies when diagnosing prostate cancer and is predictive of biochemical recurrence following a radical prostatectomy in patients with localized prostate cancer.经直肠对比增强超声有助于减少前列腺癌诊断时不必要的活检,且对于局限性前列腺癌患者行根治性前列腺切除术后生化复发具有预测价值。
BMC Urol. 2020 Jul 16;20(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s12894-020-00659-6.
3
前列腺癌在双参数磁共振成像上的位置与手术标本病理诊断的位置存在差异。
Curr Oncol. 2024 May 16;31(5):2846-2855. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31050216.
4
Perilesional Targeted Biopsy Combined with MRI-TRUS Image Fusion-Guided Targeted Prostate Biopsy: An Analysis According to PI-RADS Scores.病灶周围靶向活检联合MRI-TRUS图像融合引导下的靶向前列腺活检:基于PI-RADS评分的分析
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Aug 7;13(15):2608. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13152608.
5
Clinical Predictors of Grade Group Upgrading for Radical Prostatectomy Specimens Compared to Those of Preoperative Needle Biopsy Specimens.与术前穿刺活检标本相比,根治性前列腺切除术标本分级组升级的临床预测因素。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Nov 11;12(11):2760. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12112760.
6
Alternatives for MRI in Prostate Cancer Diagnostics-Review of Current Ultrasound-Based Techniques.前列腺癌诊断中MRI的替代方法——基于超声的当前技术综述
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Apr 7;14(8):1859. doi: 10.3390/cancers14081859.
MRI combined with PSA density in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with PSA serum levels of 4∼10ng/mL: Biparametric versus multiparametric MRI.MRI 联合 PSA 密度在检测 PSA 血清水平为 4∼10ng/mL 的患者中具有临床意义的前列腺癌:双参数与多参数 MRI。
Diagn Interv Imaging. 2020 Apr;101(4):235-244. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2020.01.014. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
4
Comparison of prostate cancer detection rates between magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy and transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy according to Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System in patients with PSA ≥4 ng/mL: a systematic review and meta-analysis.根据前列腺影像报告和数据系统,对PSA≥4 ng/mL患者进行磁共振成像靶向活检与经直肠超声引导活检的前列腺癌检出率比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Transl Androl Urol. 2019 Dec;8(6):741-753. doi: 10.21037/tau.2019.12.03.
5
Added Value of Concomitant Systematic and Fusion Targeted Biopsies for Grade Group Prediction Based on Radical Prostatectomy Final Pathology on Positive Magnetic Resonance Imaging.基于阳性磁共振成像的根治性前列腺切除术最终病理的系统和融合靶向活检对分级分组预测的附加价值。
J Urol. 2019 Dec;202(6):1182-1187. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000418. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
6
The added value of systematic biopsy in men with suspicion of prostate cancer undergoing multiparametric MRI-targeted biopsy.系统穿刺活检对接受多参数 MRI 靶向穿刺活检的疑似前列腺癌患者的附加价值。
Urol Oncol. 2019 May;37(5):298.e1-298.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.01.005. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
7
Detection of Individual Prostate Cancer Foci via Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging.通过多参数磁共振成像检测个体前列腺癌病灶。
Eur Urol. 2019 May;75(5):712-720. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.11.031. Epub 2018 Dec 1.
8
Update on Strategies to Reduce Infectious Complications After Prostate Biopsy.前列腺活检后降低感染性并发症策略的最新进展。
Eur Urol Focus. 2019 Jan;5(1):20-28. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2018.11.009. Epub 2018 Nov 30.
9
Prostate cancer screening with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test: a systematic review and meta-analysis.前列腺癌筛查中前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)检测的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2018 Sep 5;362:k3519. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k3519.
10
Screening for Prostate Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.前列腺癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2018 May 8;319(18):1901-1913. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.3710.