Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, NSW, Australia.
Faculty of Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2021;22(7):570-575. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2021.1958208. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
To examine the effect of age on the dynamic performance of child restraint systems in frontal crashes.
A sample of used (3-269 months from manufacture) and newly purchased child restraints were subjected to frontal crash simulations of more than 56 km/h and peak deceleration approximately 33 g on a deceleration sled. Restraints were monitored for evidence of damage before and after each impact. Anthropometric test device (ATD) head and chest responses and peak head excursions were recorded for rearward facing restraints using the Q1 ATD and for forward facing restraints and booster seats using the Q6 ATD. The influence of restraint age on peak 3 ms head acceleration, HIC15, head excursion, peak 3 ms chest acceleration and restraint damage were analyzed.
In all impacts, the ATD remained within the restraint and secured to the test bench demonstrating the crash protection offered by the old and used restraints. There was no apparent relationship between ATD responses and restraint age for any restraint type. Older forward facing restraint systems had a very modest increase in forward head excursion (R = 0.59, p = 0.001) of 0.27 mm for each month of age (95% CI, 0.13 mm - 0.42 mm). This equates to a 0.7% increase in the minimum measured excursion per year of restraint age. There was also a small increased likelihood of critical damage to the restraints in the simulated crashes per month of restraint age (OR 1.031, 95% CI 1.010-1.069).
Overall, degradation in restraint dynamic performance in older restraints, including some that are much older than the currently recommended 10-year lifetime, is minimal. However newer restraints may provide better protection due to marginal improvements in restraint design over time. Furthermore, the results of this study confirm previous recommendations that restraints should not be re-used after crash involvement.
研究年龄对儿童约束系统在正面碰撞中动态性能的影响。
对使用过的(从制造之日起 3-269 个月)和新购买的儿童约束系统进行了 56km/h 以上的正面碰撞模拟,峰值减速度约为 33g 在减速雪橇上。在每次撞击前后,对约束装置进行了损坏的监测。使用 Q1 ATD 为后向式约束装置和 Q6 ATD 为前向式约束装置和 booster 座椅记录了人体模型测试装置(ATD)头部和胸部的响应以及头部最大位移。分析了约束装置年龄对头部 3ms 最大加速度、HIC15、头部位移、头部 3ms 最大胸部加速度和约束装置损坏的影响。
在所有碰撞中,ATD 均留在约束装置内并固定在测试台上,证明了旧的和使用过的约束装置提供的碰撞保护。对于任何类型的约束装置,ATD 响应与约束装置年龄之间都没有明显的关系。较老的前向式约束系统的头部前向位移略有增加(R=0.59,p=0.001),每个月增加 0.27mm(95%CI,0.13mm-0.42mm)。这相当于约束装置年龄每增加一年,最小测量位移增加 0.7%。在模拟碰撞中,约束装置的关键损坏的可能性也随着约束装置年龄的增加而每月增加(OR 1.031,95%CI 1.010-1.069)。
总体而言,较老的约束装置的约束动态性能下降很小,包括那些远超过目前推荐的 10 年寿命的约束装置。然而,由于约束装置设计随着时间的推移略有改进,新型约束装置可能提供更好的保护。此外,本研究的结果证实了以前的建议,即约束装置在涉及碰撞后不应再重复使用。