Escuela de Ciencias de la Actividad Física, el Deporte y la Salud, Universidad de Santiago de Chile (USACH), Las Sophoras 175, Estación Central, Santiago, Chile.
Especialidad medicina del deporte y la actividad física, Facultad de ciencias, Universidad Mayor, Santiago, Chile.
Int J Equity Health. 2021 Aug 26;20(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01524-0.
Active transportation is a crucial sort of physical activity for developing sustainable environments and provides essential health benefits. This is particularly important in Latin American countries because they present the highest burden of non-communicable diseases relative to other worldwide regions. This study aimed to examine the patterns of active transportation and its association with sociodemographic inequities in Latin American countries.
This cross-sectional study was conducted in eight countries. Participants (n = 8547, 18-65 years) self-reported their active transportation (walking, cycling, and total) using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire. Sex, age, ethnicity, socioeconomic level, education level, public and private transport use, and transport mode were used as sociodemographic inequities.
Participants spent a total of 19.9, 3.1, and 23.3 min/day with walking, cycling, and total active transportation, respectively. Mixed and other ethnicity (Asian, Indigenous, Gypsy, and other), high socioeconomic level as well as middle and high education level presented higher walking than Caucasian, low socioeconomic and education level. Private transport mode and use of ≥ 6 days/week of private transport showed lower walking than public transport mode and ≤ 2 days/week of private transport. Use of ≥ 3 days/week of public transport use presented higher walking than ≤ 2 days/week of public transport. Men had higher cycling for active transportation than women. Use of ≥ 3 days/week of public transport use presented higher cycling than ≤ 2 days/week of public transport. ≥6 days/week showed lower cycling than ≤ 2 days/week of private transport use. Men (b: 5.57: 95 %CI: 3.89;7.26), black (3.77: 0.23;7.31), mixed (3.20: 1.39;5.00) and other ethnicity (7.30: 2.55;12.04), had higher total active transportation than women and Caucasian. Private transport mode (-7.03: -11.65;-2.41) and ≥ 6 days/week of private transport use (-4.80: -6.91;-0.31) showed lower total active transportation than public transport mode and ≤ 2 days/week of private transport use. Use of 3-5 (5.10: 1.35;8.85) and ≥ 6 days/week (8.90: 3.07;14.73) of public transport use presented higher total active transportation than ≤ 2 days/week of public transport use. Differences among countries were observed.
Sociodemographic inequities are associated differently with active transportation across Latin American countries. Interventions and policies that target the promotion of active policies transportation essential to consider sociodemographic inequities.
ClinicalTrials.Gov NCT02226627. Retrospectively registered on August 27, 2014.
积极的交通方式是发展可持续环境和提供基本健康益处的重要体育活动类型。这在拉丁美洲国家尤为重要,因为与其他世界地区相比,它们面临着最高的非传染性疾病负担。本研究旨在研究拉丁美洲国家积极交通方式的模式及其与社会人口不公平之间的关系。
本横断面研究在 8 个国家进行。参与者(n=8547,18-65 岁)使用国际体力活动问卷自我报告其积极交通方式(步行、骑车和总计)。性别、年龄、种族、社会经济水平、教育水平、公共和私人交通使用以及交通方式被用作社会人口不公平的指标。
参与者每天总计步行、骑车和总计积极交通方式的时间分别为 19.9、3.1 和 23.3 分钟。混合和其他种族(亚洲人、土著人、吉普赛人和其他人)、高社会经济水平以及中等和高等教育水平的人比白种人、低社会经济和教育水平的人更多地步行。私人交通方式和每周使用≥6 天的私人交通方式的人比使用公共交通方式和每周使用≤2 天的人步行更少。每周使用≥3 天的公共交通方式的人比每周使用≤2 天的公共交通方式的人步行更多。男性的自行车出行率高于女性。每周使用≥3 天的公共交通方式比每周使用≤2 天的公共交通方式的人骑车更多。每周使用≥6 天的人比每周使用≤2 天的私人交通方式的人骑车更少。男性(b:5.57:95%CI:3.89;7.26)、黑人(3.77:0.23;7.31)、混合(3.20:1.39;5.00)和其他种族(7.30:2.55;12.04)比女性和白种人骑车更多。私人交通方式(-7.03:-11.65;-2.41)和每周使用≥6 天的私人交通方式(-4.80:-6.91;-0.31)比公共交通方式和每周使用≤2 天的私人交通方式的人骑车更少。每周使用 3-5 天(5.10:1.35;8.85)和每周使用≥6 天(8.90:3.07;14.73)的人比每周使用≤2 天的人骑车更多。在国家之间观察到了差异。
社会人口不公平与拉丁美洲国家的积极交通方式存在不同的关联。促进积极交通方式的干预措施和政策必须考虑社会人口不公平。
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02226627。2014 年 8 月 27 日回顾性注册。