Department of Experimental Medicine, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161, Rome, Italy.
Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 Jan;38(1):211-221. doi: 10.1007/s10554-021-02384-z. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
To assess the impact of regurgitant jet direction on left ventricular function and intraventricular hemodynamics in asymptomatic patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) and mild aortic valve regurgitation (AR), using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) feature tracking and 4D flow imaging. Fifty BAV individuals were retrospectively selected: 15 with mild AR and posterior regurgitation jet (Group-PJ), 15 with regurgitant jet in other directions (Group-nPJ) and 20 with no regurgitation (Controls). CMR protocol included cine steady state free precession (SSFP) sequences and 4D Flow imaging covering the entire left ventricle (LV) cavity and the aortic root. Cine-SSFP images were analyzed to assess LV volumes, longitudinal and circumferential myocardial strain. Circumferential and longitudinal peak diastolic strain rate (PDSR) and peak diastolic velocity (PDV) were reduced in group PJ if compared to group nPJ and control group (PDSR = 1.10 ± 0.2 1/s vs. 1.34 ± 0.5 1/s vs. 1.53 ± 0.3 1/s, p:0.001 and 0.68 ± 0.2 1/s vs. 1.17 ± 0.2 1/s vs. 1.05 ± 0.4 1/s ; p < 0.001, PDV = - 101.6 ± 28.1 deg/s vs. - 201.4 ± 85.9 deg/s vs. - 221.6 ± 67.1 deg/s; p < 0.001 and - 28.1 ± 8 mm/s vs. - 38.9 ± 11.1 mm/s vs. - 43.6 ± 14.3 mm/s, p < 0.001, respectively), whereas no differences have been found in systolic strain values. 4D Flow images (available only in 9 patients) showed deformation of diastolic transmitral streamlines direction in group PJ compared to other groups. In BAV patients with mild AR, the posterior direction of the regurgitant jet may hamper the complete mitral valve opening, disturbing transmitral flow and slowing the LV diastolic filling.
评估心脏磁共振特征追踪和 4D 血流成像技术在伴轻度主动脉瓣反流(AR)的二叶式主动脉瓣(BAV)无症状患者中反流射流方向对左心室功能和室内血流动力学的影响。回顾性选择 50 例 BAV 患者:15 例伴轻度 AR 和后向反流射流(Group-PJ),15 例伴其他方向反流射流(Group-nPJ),20 例无反流(对照组)。CMR 方案包括电影稳态自由进动(SSFP)序列和 4D 血流成像,覆盖整个左心室(LV)腔和主动脉根部。分析电影 SSFP 图像以评估 LV 容积、纵向和圆周心肌应变。与 Group-nPJ 和对照组相比,Group-PJ 的圆周和纵向舒张早期峰值应变率(PDSR)和舒张早期峰值速度(PDV)降低(PDSR=1.10±0.2 1/s 比 1.34±0.5 1/s 比 1.53±0.3 1/s,p=0.001;0.68±0.2 1/s 比 1.17±0.2 1/s 比 1.05±0.4 1/s,p<0.001;PDV=-101.6±28.1 deg/s 比-201.4±85.9 deg/s 比-221.6±67.1 deg/s,p<0.001;-28.1±8 mm/s 比-38.9±11.1 mm/s 比-43.6±14.3 mm/s,p<0.001),而收缩期应变值无差异。4D 血流图像(仅在 9 例患者中获得)显示 Group-PJ 的舒张期跨瓣血流流线方向变形与其他组比较。在伴轻度 AR 的 BAV 患者中,反流射流的后向可能阻碍二尖瓣完全开放,干扰跨瓣血流并减缓 LV 舒张充盈。