Suppr超能文献

联合使用多种检测方法可提高口蹄疫病毒的检出率和血清分型。来自东非的野外样本的实际应用案例。

Combining Multiple Assays Improves Detection and Serotyping of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus. A Practical Example with Field Samples from East Africa.

机构信息

Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia Romagna (IZSLER), 25124 Brescia, Italy.

The Boyd Orr Centre for Population and Ecosystem Health, Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health & Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK.

出版信息

Viruses. 2021 Aug 10;13(8):1583. doi: 10.3390/v13081583.

Abstract

Multiple serotypes and topotypes of foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) circulate in endemic areas, posing considerable impacts locally. In addition, introductions into new areas are of great concern. Indeed, in recent years, multiple FMDV outbreaks, caused by topotypes that have escaped from their original areas, have been recorded in various parts of the world. In both cases, rapid and accurate diagnosis, including the identification of the serotype and topotype causing the given outbreaks, plays an important role in the implementation of the most effective and appropriate measures to control the spread of the disease. In the present study, we describe the performance of a range of diagnostic and typing tools for FMDV on a panel of vesicular samples collected in northern Tanzania (East Africa, EA) during 2012-2018. Specifically, we tested these samples with a real-time RT-PCR targeting 3D sequence for pan-FMDV detection; an FMDV monoclonal antibody-based antigen (Ag) detection and serotyping ELISA kit; virus isolation (VI) on LFBKαVβ6 cell line; and a panel of four topotype-specific real-time RT-PCRs, specifically tailored for circulating strains in EA. The 3D real-time RT-PCR showed the highest diagnostic sensitivity, but it lacked typing capacity. Ag-ELISA detected and typed FMDV in 71% of sample homogenates, while VI combined with Ag-ELISA for typing showed an efficiency of 82%. The panel of topotype-specific real-time RT-PCRs identified and typed FMDV in 93% of samples. However, the SAT1 real-time RT-PCR had the highest (20%) failure rate. Briefly, topotype-specific real-time RT-PCRs had the highest serotyping capacity for EA FMDVs, although four assays were required, while the Ag-ELISA, which was less sensitive, was the most user-friendly, hence suitable for any laboratory level. In conclusion, when the four compared tests were used in combination, both the diagnostic and serotyping performances approached 100%.

摘要

口蹄疫病毒(FMDV)的多个血清型和拓扑型在流行地区传播,对当地造成了相当大的影响。此外,新地区的传入也令人担忧。事实上,近年来,由逃离原地区的拓扑型引起的多次口蹄疫爆发已在世界不同地区记录。在这两种情况下,快速准确的诊断,包括确定引起特定爆发的血清型和拓扑型,对口蹄疫传播的最有效和适当措施的实施起着重要作用。在本研究中,我们描述了一系列针对 2012 年至 2018 年在东非坦桑尼亚北部采集的水疱样品进行口蹄疫诊断和分型的工具的性能。具体来说,我们用针对 3D 序列的实时 RT-PCR 检测了 pan-FMDV;FMDV 单克隆抗体为基础的抗原(Ag)检测和血清分型 ELISA 试剂盒;在 LFBKαVβ6 细胞系上的病毒分离(VI);以及一组针对 EA 循环株定制的四个拓扑型特异性实时 RT-PCR。3D 实时 RT-PCR 显示了最高的诊断灵敏度,但缺乏分型能力。Ag-ELISA 在 71%的样品匀浆中检测和分型 FMDV,而 VI 与 Ag-ELISA 联合进行分型的效率为 82%。拓扑型特异性实时 RT-PCR 鉴定和分型了 93%的样品中的 FMDV。然而,SAT1 实时 RT-PCR 的失败率最高(20%)。简而言之,拓扑型特异性实时 RT-PCR 对口蹄疫病毒具有最高的血清分型能力,尽管需要四个检测,但灵敏度较低的 Ag-ELISA 最方便用户使用,因此适合任何实验室水平。总之,当结合使用这四种比较试验时,诊断和血清分型性能都接近 100%。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5801/8412026/44e1d7fcd778/viruses-13-01583-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验