• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

衡量真实世界证据的有效性,以确保产生适当影响。

Measuring the Effectiveness of Real-World Evidence to Ensure Appropriate Impact.

机构信息

Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, England, UK.

Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, England, UK.

出版信息

Value Health. 2021 Sep;24(9):1241-1244. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.03.020. Epub 2021 Jun 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.jval.2021.03.020
PMID:34452702
Abstract

The value of real-world evidence (RWE) in medicines regulation and health technology assessment has been increasingly emphasized. Nevertheless, although RWE is increasingly used, there has been limited systematic evidence of its value. A recent study that examined the role and impact of RWE in regulatory assessments conducted through the European Medicines Agency provided such evidence. Results of the study demonstrated RWE was important to decision making, particularly for certain questions such as the quantification of adverse events, the evaluation of risk minimization measures, and the assessment of product usage. The study suggested, however, that in many of the assessments further RWE would have been valuable and concluded that RWE has, as yet, played a limited role in hypothesis generation and in the assessment of medication effectiveness. This study had been possible only because of the transparency of the European Medicines Agency decision making. Ensuring transparency of RWE evidence collection, study design and conduct, and of decision making based on this evidence will facilitate further development of the uses and value of RWE. Keywords: benefit-risk assessment; medicines regulation; real-world evidence; regulatory decision making.

摘要

真实世界证据(RWE)在药物监管和卫生技术评估中的价值已日益受到重视。然而,尽管 RWE 的应用日益广泛,但关于其价值的系统证据有限。最近一项研究考察了 RWE 在欧洲药品管理局开展的监管评估中的作用和影响,为这方面提供了证据。该研究结果表明,RWE 对决策很重要,特别是对于某些问题,如不良事件的量化、风险最小化措施的评估以及产品使用情况的评估。然而,该研究表明,在许多评估中,进一步的 RWE 将是有价值的,并得出结论认为,RWE 在假设生成和药物疗效评估方面的作用有限。这项研究之所以成为可能,仅仅是因为欧洲药品管理局决策的透明度。确保 RWE 证据收集、研究设计和实施以及基于该证据的决策的透明度,将有助于进一步发展 RWE 的用途和价值。关键词:风险获益评估;药物监管;真实世界证据;监管决策。

相似文献

1
Measuring the Effectiveness of Real-World Evidence to Ensure Appropriate Impact.衡量真实世界证据的有效性,以确保产生适当影响。
Value Health. 2021 Sep;24(9):1241-1244. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.03.020. Epub 2021 Jun 26.
2
The maze of real-world evidence frameworks: from a desert to a jungle! An environmental scan and comparison across regulatory and health technology assessment agencies.真实世界证据框架的迷宫:从沙漠到丛林!监管机构和卫生技术评估机构的环境扫描和比较。
J Comp Eff Res. 2024 Sep;13(9):e240061. doi: 10.57264/cer-2024-0061. Epub 2024 Aug 12.
3
The utility of real-world evidence for benefit-risk assessment, communication, and evaluation of pharmaceuticals: Case studies.真实世界证据在药品获益-风险评估、沟通和评价中的应用:案例研究。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2020 Dec;29(12):1532-1539. doi: 10.1002/pds.5167. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
4
Study types and reliability of Real World Evidence compared with experimental evidence used in Polish reimbursement decision-making processes.与波兰报销决策过程中使用的实验证据相比,真实世界证据的研究类型和可靠性。
Public Health. 2017 Apr;145:51-58. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2016.12.025. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
5
Online tools to synthesize real-world evidence of comparative effectiveness research to enhance formulary decision making.在线工具合成比较有效性研究的真实世界证据,以加强处方决策。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Jan;27(1):95-104. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.1.095.
6
Use of Real-World Evidence in US Payer Coverage Decision-Making for Next-Generation Sequencing-Based Tests: Challenges, Opportunities, and Potential Solutions.真实世界证据在基于下一代测序的检测美国支付方覆盖决策中的应用:挑战、机遇和潜在解决方案。
Value Health. 2020 May;23(5):540-550. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.02.001. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
7
Improving Transparency to Build Trust in Real-World Secondary Data Studies for Hypothesis Testing-Why, What, and How: Recommendations and a Road Map from the Real-World Evidence Transparency Initiative.提高透明度以建立对假设检验的真实世界二次数据研究的信任——原因、内容和方法:来自真实世界证据透明度倡议的建议和路线图。
Value Health. 2020 Sep;23(9):1128-1136. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.04.002.
8
Marketing Authorization Applications Made to the European Medicines Agency in 2018-2019: What was the Contribution of Real-World Evidence?2018-2019 年向欧洲药品管理局提交的营销授权申请:真实世界证据的贡献是什么?
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2022 Jan;111(1):90-97. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2461. Epub 2021 Nov 13.
9
Real-world evidence: perspectives on challenges, value, and alignment of regulatory and national health technology assessment data collection requirements.真实世界证据:对监管和国家卫生技术评估数据收集要求的挑战、价值和一致性的观点。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2021 Feb 24;37:e40. doi: 10.1017/S0266462321000131.
10
Improving transparency to build trust in real-world secondary data studies for hypothesis testing-Why, what, and how: recommendations and a road map from the real-world evidence transparency initiative.提高透明度以增强对用于假设检验的真实世界二次数据研究的信任——为何、是什么以及如何做:来自真实世界证据透明度倡议的建议和路线图
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2020 Nov;29(11):1504-1513. doi: 10.1002/pds.5079. Epub 2020 Sep 13.

引用本文的文献

1
A Propensity-Matched Retrospective Comparative Study with Historical Control to Determine the Real-World Effectiveness of Durvalumab after Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Unresectable Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.一项采用历史对照的倾向匹配回顾性比较研究,以确定度伐利尤单抗在不可切除的 III 期非小细胞肺癌同步放化疗后的真实世界有效性。
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Mar 5;15(5):1606. doi: 10.3390/cancers15051606.