Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Value Health. 2021 Sep;24(9):1245-1253. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.03.018. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
Programmatic cost assessment of novel clinical interventions can inform their widespread dissemination and implementation. This study aimed to determine the programmatic costs of a telehealth Ostomy Self-Management Training (OSMT) intervention for cancer survivors using Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing (TDABC) methodology.
We demonstrated a step-by-step application of TDABC based on a process map with core OSMT intervention activities and associated procedures and determined resource use and costs, per unit procedure. We also assessed per-patient costs from a payer perspective and provided estimates of total hours and costs by personnel, activity, and procedure.
The per-patient cost of the OSMT was $1758. Personnel time accounted for 91% of the total cost. Site supervisor and information technology technician time were the most expensive personnel resources. Telehealth technical and communication equipment accounted for 8% of the total cost. Intervention coordination and monitoring efforts represented most of the total time cost (62%), followed by the intervention delivery (35%). The procedures with the highest cost were communication via phone or virtual meetings (24%), email exchanges (18%), and telehealth session delivery (18%).
Future efforts to replicate, disseminate, and implement the OSMT intervention should anticipate funding for nonclinical components of the intervention, including coordination and monitoring, and consider how these activities can be performed most efficiently. For institutions without established telemedicine programs, selection of videoconferencing platforms and adequate staffing for participant technical support should be considered. Our step-by-step application of TDABC serves as a case study demonstrating how interventionists can gather data on resource use and costs of intervention activities concurrently with their collection of trial data.
对新的临床干预措施进行计划性成本评估,可以为其广泛传播和实施提供信息。本研究旨在使用时间驱动作业成本法(TDABC)来确定一种针对癌症幸存者的远程医疗造口自我管理培训(OSMT)干预措施的计划性成本。
我们展示了基于 OSMT 核心干预活动及其相关程序的流程图,对 TDABC 的分步应用,并确定了每单位程序的资源使用和成本。我们还从支付方的角度评估了每位患者的成本,并按人员、活动和程序提供了总时间和成本的估计。
OSMT 的每位患者成本为 1758 美元。人员时间占总成本的 91%。现场主管和信息技术技术员的时间是最昂贵的人员资源。远程医疗技术和通信设备占总成本的 8%。干预协调和监测工作占总时间成本的 62%(最高),其次是干预交付(35%)。成本最高的程序是通过电话或虚拟会议进行的沟通(24%)、电子邮件交流(18%)和远程医疗会议交付(18%)。
未来复制、传播和实施 OSMT 干预措施的工作应预计为干预的非临床部分提供资金,包括协调和监测,并考虑如何最有效地开展这些活动。对于没有建立远程医疗计划的机构,应考虑选择视频会议平台和为参与者提供技术支持的充足人员。我们对 TDABC 的分步应用为案例研究,展示了干预者如何在收集试验数据的同时收集干预活动的资源使用和成本数据。