Suppr超能文献

CPT-11 对比 PTX 对比 S-1 联合化疗治疗对 S-1 或 S-1+CDDP 耐药的晚期胃癌的随机 II 期研究:OGSG0701。

Randomized phase II study of CPT-11 versus PTX versus each combination chemotherapy with S-1 for advanced gastric cancer that is refractory to S-1 or S-1 plus CDDP: OGSG0701.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Toyonaka Municipal Hospital, 4-14-1 Shibahara-cho, Toyonaka, Japan.

Cancer Chemotherapy Center, Osaka Medical College Hospital, Takatsuki, Japan.

出版信息

Int J Clin Oncol. 2021 Oct;26(10):1871-1880. doi: 10.1007/s10147-021-01984-y. Epub 2021 Aug 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To compare irinotecan-alone, paclitaxel-alone, and each combination chemotherapy with S-1 in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) that is refractory to S-1 or S-1 plus cisplatin (SP).

METHODS

Patients with AGC after first-line chemotherapy with S-1 or SP, or patients during adjuvant chemotherapy or within 26 weeks after adjuvant chemotherapy completion with S-1 with confirmed disease progression were eligible. Patients were randomly divided into four groups based on treatment: irinotecan-alone (irinotecan; 150 mg/m, day 1, q14 days), paclitaxel-alone (paclitaxel; 80 mg/m, days 1, 8, 15, q28 days), S-1 plus irinotecan (irinotecan; 80 mg/m, days 1, 15, S-1; 80 mg/m, days 1-21, q35 days), and S-1 plus paclitaxel (paclitaxel; 50 mg/m, day1, 8, S-1; 80 mg/m, days 1-14, q21 days). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) and secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), response rate, and safety.

RESULTS

From July 2008 to March 2012, 127 patients were enrolled. No difference in median OS was observed in the irinotecan vs. paclitaxel groups or in the monotherapy groups vs. the S-1 combination therapy groups. Median PFS was longer in the paclitaxel group compared with the irinotecan group (4.1 vs. 3.6 months, p = 0.035), although no difference was observed when comparing monotherapy vs. S-1 combination. The most common grade 3 to 4 hematological adverse events were neutropenia with no difference in incidence rate across the treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no difference in OS between irinotecan and paclitaxel no in OS prolongation of S-1 combination therapy in second-line chemotherapy.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在比较伊立替康单药、紫杉醇单药及伊立替康联合替吉奥(S-1)、紫杉醇联合 S-1 方案二线治疗对 S-1 或 S-1 联合顺铂(SP)治疗失败的晚期胃癌(AGC)患者的疗效。

方法

患者均为一线接受 S-1 或 SP 方案化疗、辅助化疗期间或辅助化疗结束后 26 周内疾病进展的 AGC 患者。患者按治疗方案随机分为四组:伊立替康单药组(伊立替康 150mg/m²,第 1 天,q14d)、紫杉醇单药组(紫杉醇 80mg/m²,第 1、8、15 天,q28d)、S-1 联合伊立替康组(伊立替康 80mg/m²,第 1、15 天,S-1 80mg/m²,第 1-21 天,q35d)、S-1 联合紫杉醇组(紫杉醇 50mg/m²,第 1、8 天,S-1 80mg/m²,第 1-14 天,q21d)。主要终点为总生存期(OS),次要终点为无进展生存期(PFS)、缓解率和安全性。

结果

2008 年 7 月至 2012 年 3 月,共纳入 127 例患者。伊立替康组与紫杉醇组、单药组与 S-1 联合组的中位 OS 无差异。紫杉醇组的中位 PFS 长于伊立替康组(4.1 个月比 3.6 个月,p=0.035),但单药组与 S-1 联合组之间无差异。最常见的 3-4 级血液学不良事件是中性粒细胞减少,各组发生率无差异。

结论

伊立替康与紫杉醇的 OS 无差异,S-1 联合方案在二线化疗中并未延长 OS。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验