Nakanishi Koki, Kobayashi Daisuke, Mochizuki Yoshinari, Ishigure Kiyoshi, Ito Seiji, Kojima Hiroshi, Ishiyama Akiharu, Fujitake Shinichi, Shikano Toshio, Morita Satoshi, Kodera Yasuhiro
Department of Surgery, Komaki City Hospital, Komaki, Japan.
Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, 466-8550, Japan.
Int J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jun;21(3):557-65. doi: 10.1007/s10147-015-0919-z. Epub 2015 Nov 7.
The aim of this study was to explore whether a combination of S-1 and paclitaxel offers any benefit over paclitaxel alone to patients pretreated by S-1.
Gastric cancer patients who developed progression during S-1-based first-line chemotherapy or had recurrence during postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy by S-1 were randomly assigned to receive second-line treatment either by weekly administration of paclitaxel at 80 mg/m(2) three times every 4 weeks or daily oral S-1 (80 mg/m(2)) for 2 weeks plus paclitaxel (50 mg/m(2)) given on days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks (S-1 plus paclitaxel). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) at 4 months after the initiation of treatment.
A total of 78 patients were eligible for efficacy analyses-40 were assigned to the paclitaxel group and 38 to the S-1 plus paclitaxel group. PFS at 4 months was similar between the groups (50 % for paclitaxel vs 55 % for S-1 plus paclitaxel, P = 0.641). There were no differences between the groups either in progression-free survival (4.6 vs 4.6 months, respectively, P = 0.526), overall survival (10.0 vs 10.0 months, respectively, P = 0.464), or overall response rate (27 vs 22 %, respectively, P = 0.767). The incidences of grade 3 or 4 hematological and non-hematological toxicities were also equivalent between the two groups (25 vs 26 % and 24 vs 26 %, respectively).
No benefit of S-1 administration beyond progression was shown when paclitaxel was selected as the key drug for second-line chemotherapy.
本研究旨在探讨对于接受过S-1预处理的患者,S-1与紫杉醇联合用药是否比单独使用紫杉醇更具优势。
在基于S-1的一线化疗期间病情进展或术后接受S-1辅助化疗时复发的胃癌患者,被随机分配接受二线治疗,即每4周静脉注射紫杉醇80mg/m²,每周1次,共3次;或口服S-1(80mg/m²),每日1次,共2周,加用紫杉醇(50mg/m²),于第1天和第8天给药,每3周重复(S-1联合紫杉醇)。主要终点为治疗开始后4个月的无进展生存期(PFS)。
共有78例患者符合疗效分析标准,40例被分配至紫杉醇组,38例被分配至S-1联合紫杉醇组。两组间4个月时的PFS相似(紫杉醇组为50%,S-1联合紫杉醇组为55%,P = 0.641)。两组在无进展生存期(分别为4.6个月和4.6个月,P = 0.526)、总生存期(分别为10.0个月和10.0个月,P = 0.464)或总缓解率(分别为27%和22%,P = 0.七十六7)方面均无差异。两组3级或4级血液学和非血液学毒性的发生率也相当(分别为25%对26%和24%对26%)。
当选择紫杉醇作为二线化疗的关键药物时,未显示出S-1给药在病情进展后具有优势。