Suppr超能文献

大多数镇痛治疗对前交叉韧带重建术没有临床意义:66 项随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析。

Most Analgesia Treatments Have No Clinical Significance for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Network Meta-analysis of 66 Randomized Controlled Trials.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

School of Finance, Qilu University of Technology, Jinan, China.

出版信息

Arthroscopy. 2022 Apr;38(4):1326-1340.e0. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.08.023. Epub 2021 Aug 25.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the relative efficacy of several clinical treatments for postoperative analgesia of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction through network meta-analysis based on multiple published randomized controlled trials.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, the Cochrane library, EMBASE, and Web of Science, each from inception until February 15, 2021. Outcomes including pain scores at rest (visual analog scale, numerical rating scales, and other scales, which were converted to a standardized 0-10 scale), morphine consumption, and complications were meta-analyzed. Quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. The authors defined the best choice for postoperative analgesia as the one that had significant difference in pain scores, morphine consumption, and had no significant difference in the risk of complications compared with placebo in the initial 48 postoperative hours.

RESULTS

In total, 66 studies with 4,168 patients were included in this network meta-analysis. Only periarticular infiltration was significantly superior to placebo in pain scores and morphine consumption (pain at 2 hours: mean difference [MD] -0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.36 to -0.12; pain at 6 hours: MD -0.81, 95% CI -1.42 to -0.21; pain at 12 hours: MD -0.85, 95% CI -1.53 to -0.17; pain at 24 hours: MD -0.80, 95% CI -1.19 to -0.40; morphine consumption at 24 hours: MD -10.12, 95% CI -14.31 to -5.93; morphine consumption at 48 hours: MD -5.62, 95% CI -6.74 to -4.51). Periarticular infiltration did not increase the risk of complications compared with placebo (nausea and vomiting: odds ratio [OR] 0.63, 95% CI 0.34-1.16; pruritus: OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.35-1.58; urinary retention: OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.25-1.23). In addition, There was no significant difference between adductor canal block and femoral nerve block in pain scores and morphine consumption (pain at 2 hours: MD -0.01, 95% CI -1.44 to 1.42; pain at 6 hours: MD 0.29, 95% CI -0.28 to 0.86; pain at 12 hours: MD 0.36, 95% CI -0.44 to 1.16; pain at 24 hours: MD 0.26, 95% CI -0.22 to 0.75; pain at 48 hours: MD -0.36, 95% CI -0.97 to 0.24; morphine at 24 hours: MD 1.04, 95% CI -4.70 to 6.79; morphine at 48 hours: MD -0.32, 95% CI -0.70 to 0.07; postoperative nausea and vomiting: OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.55-2.09; pruritus: OR 1.36, 95% CI 0.66-2.79; urinary retention: OR 1.41, 95% CI 0.37-5.29).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on current evidence, most analgesic methods could result in lower pain scores and decrease morphine consumption when compared with placebo; however, differences between methods were small and inconsistent. There seemed to be no significant difference between adductor canal block and femoral nerve block in pain score, morphine consumption and complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, meta-analysis of Level I RCTs.

摘要

目的

通过基于多项已发表随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析,评估几种用于前交叉韧带重建术后镇痛的临床治疗方法的相对疗效。

方法

我们检索了 PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆、EMBASE 和 Web of Science,每个数据库均从成立至 2021 年 2 月 15 日。对包括静息时疼痛评分(视觉模拟评分、数字评分量表和其他量表,均转换为标准化的 0-10 量表)、吗啡用量和并发症在内的结局进行荟萃分析。使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具评估纳入研究的质量。作者将术后镇痛的最佳选择定义为与安慰剂相比,在最初 48 小时内疼痛评分、吗啡用量有显著差异,且并发症风险无显著差异的治疗方法。

结果

共有 66 项研究,涉及 4168 名患者纳入了本网络荟萃分析。只有关节周围浸润与安慰剂相比在疼痛评分和吗啡用量方面有显著优势(2 小时疼痛评分:MD -0.74,95%CI -1.36 至 -0.12;6 小时疼痛评分:MD -0.81,95%CI -1.42 至 -0.21;12 小时疼痛评分:MD -0.85,95%CI -1.53 至 -0.17;24 小时疼痛评分:MD -0.80,95%CI -1.19 至 -0.40;24 小时吗啡用量:MD -10.12,95%CI -14.31 至 -5.93;48 小时吗啡用量:MD -5.62,95%CI -6.74 至 -4.51)。关节周围浸润与安慰剂相比并未增加并发症的风险(恶心呕吐:OR 0.63,95%CI 0.34-1.16;瘙痒:OR 0.74,95%CI 0.35-1.58;尿潴留:OR 0.55,95%CI 0.25-1.23)。此外,股神经阻滞和收肌管阻滞在疼痛评分和吗啡用量方面无显著差异(2 小时疼痛评分:MD -0.01,95%CI -1.44 至 1.42;6 小时疼痛评分:MD 0.29,95%CI -0.28 至 0.86;12 小时疼痛评分:MD 0.36,95%CI -0.44 至 1.16;24 小时疼痛评分:MD 0.26,95%CI -0.22 至 0.75;48 小时疼痛评分:MD -0.36,95%CI -0.97 至 0.24;24 小时吗啡用量:MD 1.04,95%CI -4.70 至 6.79;48 小时吗啡用量:MD -0.32,95%CI -0.70 至 0.07;术后恶心呕吐:OR 1.07,95%CI 0.55-2.09;瘙痒:OR 1.36,95%CI 0.66-2.79;尿潴留:OR 1.41,95%CI 0.37-5.29)。

结论

根据目前的证据,与安慰剂相比,大多数镇痛方法可降低疼痛评分和吗啡用量;然而,方法之间的差异较小且不一致。股神经阻滞和收肌管阻滞在疼痛评分、吗啡用量和并发症方面似乎没有显著差异。

证据水平

一级,一级随机对照试验的荟萃分析。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验