Suppr超能文献

股神经阻滞与局部浸润镇痛在前交叉韧带重建术后24小时内区域麻醉干预中疗效更可靠:一项网状Meta分析

Femoral Nerve Block and Local Instillation Analgesia Associated With More Reliable Efficacy in Regional Anesthesia Interventions Within 24 Hours Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Network Meta-analysis.

作者信息

Liu Hongzhi, Song Xinqiu, Li Chuiqing, Li Yan, Guo Wanshou, Zhang Hongmei

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Wangjing Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.

Yan'an University, Yan'an, Shaanxi, China.

出版信息

Arthroscopy. 2023 May;39(5):1273-1295. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2022.12.014. Epub 2023 Jan 26.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the relative effectiveness of different regional anesthetic techniques (peripheral nerve blocks, local instillation analgesia, including intra-articular, subcutaneous, and periarticular infiltration) in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched from their inception to December 31, 2020. The search was supplemented by manual review of relevant reference lists. Randomized controlled trials of participants after ACLR that compared regional anesthesia interventions were selected. The 2 coprimary outcomes were (1) rest pain scores and (2) cumulative oral morphine equivalent consumption on day 1 (24 hours) post-ACLR. Data were pooled using a Bayesian framework.

RESULTS

Of 759 records identified, 46 trials were eligible, evaluating 9 interventions in 3,171 patients. Local instillation analgesia (LIA), including intra-articular, subcutaneous, and periarticular infiltration, had significant improvement in pain relief as compared with placebo (-0.91; 95% CrI -1.45 to -0.37). Femoral nerve block (FNB) also showed significant effects in relieving pain as compared with placebo (-0.70; 95% 95% credible interval [CrI] -1.28 to -0.12). Compared with placebo, a significant reduction in opioid consumption was found in LIA (mean difference -13.29 mg; 95% CrI -21.77 to -4.91) and FNB (mean difference -13.97 mg; 95% CrI -24.71 to -3.04). Femoral and sciatic nerve block showed the greatest ranking for pain relief and opioid consumption without significant evidence (P > .05) to support superiority in comparison with placebo, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis shows that FNB and LIA can significantly diminish postoperative pain and reduce opioid consumption following ACLR compared with placebo in the setting of regional anesthesia, and femoral and sciatic nerve block may be the number 1 top-ranked analgesic technique despite high uncertainty.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I, Systematic review of Level I studies.

摘要

目的

评估不同区域麻醉技术(外周神经阻滞、局部灌注镇痛,包括关节内、皮下及关节周围浸润)在前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)患者中的相对有效性。

方法

检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆和Web of Science数据库自建库至2020年12月31日的文献。通过人工查阅相关参考文献列表进行补充检索。选取比较区域麻醉干预措施的ACLR术后参与者的随机对照试验。两个共同主要结局为:(1)静息疼痛评分;(2)ACLR术后第1天(24小时)口服吗啡当量累计消耗量。使用贝叶斯框架汇总数据。

结果

在识别出的759条记录中,46项试验符合纳入标准,对3171例患者的9种干预措施进行了评估。与安慰剂相比,局部灌注镇痛(LIA,包括关节内、皮下及关节周围浸润)在缓解疼痛方面有显著改善(-0.91;95%可信区间[CrI] -1.45至-0.37)。与安慰剂相比,股神经阻滞(FNB)在缓解疼痛方面也显示出显著效果(-0.70;95% CrI -1.28至-0.12)。与安慰剂相比,LIA(平均差值-13.29 mg;95% CrI -21.77至-4.91)和FNB(平均差值-13.97 mg;95% CrI -24.71至-3.04)的阿片类药物消耗量显著降低。股神经和坐骨神经阻滞在缓解疼痛和阿片类药物消耗量方面的排名最高,但与安慰剂相比,分别没有显著证据(P >.05)支持其优越性。

结论

我们的荟萃分析表明,在区域麻醉的情况下,与安慰剂相比,FNB和LIA可显著减轻ACLR术后疼痛并减少阿片类药物消耗,尽管不确定性较高,但股神经和坐骨神经阻滞可能是排名第一的镇痛技术。

证据级别

I,I级研究的系统评价。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验