Liu Hongzhi, Song Xinqiu, Li Chuiqing, Li Yan, Guo Wanshou, Zhang Hongmei
Department of Orthopaedics, Wangjing Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yan'an University, Yan'an, Shaanxi, China.
Arthroscopy. 2023 May;39(5):1273-1295. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2022.12.014. Epub 2023 Jan 26.
To assess the relative effectiveness of different regional anesthetic techniques (peripheral nerve blocks, local instillation analgesia, including intra-articular, subcutaneous, and periarticular infiltration) in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).
PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched from their inception to December 31, 2020. The search was supplemented by manual review of relevant reference lists. Randomized controlled trials of participants after ACLR that compared regional anesthesia interventions were selected. The 2 coprimary outcomes were (1) rest pain scores and (2) cumulative oral morphine equivalent consumption on day 1 (24 hours) post-ACLR. Data were pooled using a Bayesian framework.
Of 759 records identified, 46 trials were eligible, evaluating 9 interventions in 3,171 patients. Local instillation analgesia (LIA), including intra-articular, subcutaneous, and periarticular infiltration, had significant improvement in pain relief as compared with placebo (-0.91; 95% CrI -1.45 to -0.37). Femoral nerve block (FNB) also showed significant effects in relieving pain as compared with placebo (-0.70; 95% 95% credible interval [CrI] -1.28 to -0.12). Compared with placebo, a significant reduction in opioid consumption was found in LIA (mean difference -13.29 mg; 95% CrI -21.77 to -4.91) and FNB (mean difference -13.97 mg; 95% CrI -24.71 to -3.04). Femoral and sciatic nerve block showed the greatest ranking for pain relief and opioid consumption without significant evidence (P > .05) to support superiority in comparison with placebo, respectively.
Our meta-analysis shows that FNB and LIA can significantly diminish postoperative pain and reduce opioid consumption following ACLR compared with placebo in the setting of regional anesthesia, and femoral and sciatic nerve block may be the number 1 top-ranked analgesic technique despite high uncertainty.
I, Systematic review of Level I studies.
评估不同区域麻醉技术(外周神经阻滞、局部灌注镇痛,包括关节内、皮下及关节周围浸润)在前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)患者中的相对有效性。
检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆和Web of Science数据库自建库至2020年12月31日的文献。通过人工查阅相关参考文献列表进行补充检索。选取比较区域麻醉干预措施的ACLR术后参与者的随机对照试验。两个共同主要结局为:(1)静息疼痛评分;(2)ACLR术后第1天(24小时)口服吗啡当量累计消耗量。使用贝叶斯框架汇总数据。
在识别出的759条记录中,46项试验符合纳入标准,对3171例患者的9种干预措施进行了评估。与安慰剂相比,局部灌注镇痛(LIA,包括关节内、皮下及关节周围浸润)在缓解疼痛方面有显著改善(-0.91;95%可信区间[CrI] -1.45至-0.37)。与安慰剂相比,股神经阻滞(FNB)在缓解疼痛方面也显示出显著效果(-0.70;95% CrI -1.28至-0.12)。与安慰剂相比,LIA(平均差值-13.29 mg;95% CrI -21.77至-4.91)和FNB(平均差值-13.97 mg;95% CrI -24.71至-3.04)的阿片类药物消耗量显著降低。股神经和坐骨神经阻滞在缓解疼痛和阿片类药物消耗量方面的排名最高,但与安慰剂相比,分别没有显著证据(P >.05)支持其优越性。
我们的荟萃分析表明,在区域麻醉的情况下,与安慰剂相比,FNB和LIA可显著减轻ACLR术后疼痛并减少阿片类药物消耗,尽管不确定性较高,但股神经和坐骨神经阻滞可能是排名第一的镇痛技术。
I,I级研究的系统评价。