Suppr超能文献

一项旨在减少精神科住院患者自杀和自残风险的心理社会干预的系统评价和荟萃分析。

A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions aiming to reduce risks of suicide and self-harm in psychiatric inpatients.

机构信息

Division of Psychiatry, UCL, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK.

Division of Psychiatry, UCL, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK.

出版信息

Psychiatry Res. 2021 Nov;305:114175. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2021.114175. Epub 2021 Aug 16.

Abstract

Psychosocial interventions, such as Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT), are often recommended in UK clinical guidelines to reduce suicidality and self-harm in service users with serious mental health problems, but the effectiveness of these interventions in acute mental health inpatient settings is not established. The aim of this study is to examine the types, and effectiveness of psychosocial interventions in inpatient settings in reducing the risk of self-harm and suicidality. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) examining the efficacy of suicide and self-harm focused inpatient psychosocial interventions on suicidality (primary outcome), depression, hopelessness and suicide attempts (secondary outcomes). A total of ten studies met eligibility criteria were included in this review. All had low to moderate risk of bias for majority of the indicators, except for blinding of participants where all studies had high risk of bias. All studies examined psychosocial interventions for suicide reduction and none examined a psychosocial intervention for self-harm. The majority of the psychosocial interventions were CBT and Dialectical Behavioural Therapy (DBT). The interventions were no more effective than control treatments in reducing suicidality, depression, hopelessness or suicide attempts post-therapy and at follow-up. However, the majority were small pilot or feasibility RCTs. In conclusion, the finding from this review suggests that psychosocial interventions are not any more effective in reducing suicidality in acute mental health inpatient settings than control interventions. However, a large-scale RCT examining a psychosocial intervention for suicide is needed to provide conclusive findings. There were also no identified RCTs examining self-harm interventions indicating a need to conduct research in this area.

摘要

心理社会干预措施,如认知行为疗法(CBT),常被英国临床指南推荐用于减少有严重精神健康问题的服务使用者的自杀意念和自伤行为,但这些干预措施在急性精神科住院环境中的有效性尚未确定。本研究旨在检查心理社会干预措施在减少自伤和自杀风险方面的类型和效果。对检查自杀和自伤为重点的住院心理社会干预措施对自杀意念(主要结局)、抑郁、绝望和自杀企图(次要结局)的疗效的随机对照试验(RCT)进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。共有 10 项符合纳入标准的研究被纳入本综述。除了参与者的盲法外,所有研究均具有高偏倚风险,所有研究在大多数指标上都具有低至中度的偏倚风险。所有研究都检查了减少自杀的心理社会干预措施,而没有研究检查针对自伤的心理社会干预措施。大多数心理社会干预措施是认知行为疗法(CBT)和辩证行为疗法(DBT)。干预措施在治疗后和随访时在降低自杀意念、抑郁、绝望或自杀企图方面并不比对照治疗更有效。然而,大多数都是小型试点或可行性 RCT。总之,本综述的结果表明,心理社会干预措施在急性精神科住院环境中降低自杀意念方面并不比对照干预措施更有效。然而,需要进行一项大型 RCT 来检验针对自杀的心理社会干预措施,以提供确凿的结论。也没有发现针对自伤干预措施的 RCT,表明需要在这一领域开展研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验