Barwon Centre for Orthopaedic Research and Education (B-CORE), St John of God Hospital Geelong and Barwon Health, Myers Street, Geelong, VIC, 3227, Australia.
School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong Campus at Waurn Ponds, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Dec;29(12):4015-4021. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06702-9. Epub 2021 Aug 29.
Inferior glenoid labral tears are an uncommon but distinct shoulder injury. Only a small number of studies have reported outcomes following arthroscopic repair. The aim of the current study was to report minimum 2-year outcomes following inferior labral repair and to compare outcomes and risk factors associated with the injury to non-inferior labral tears. Whether preoperative MRI or MRA identified inferior labral tears was also assessed.
A prospective study of 162 consecutive patients undergoing arthroscopic glenoid labral repair, excluding isolated superior labral tears, was conducted. Of the 130 patients available for follow-up, 18 (13.7%) had an inferior labral tear ("Down Under lesion"), the remainder had anterior, posterior or mixed anterior/posterior lesions that did not include the inferior pole. Mean follow-up time for the Down Under group was 44 months (SD 10, range 27-57), and 30 months (SD 14, range 4-60) for the non-Down Under group. Postoperative outcomes included the Oxford Shoulder Instability Score and recurrent instability. Associations between Down Under lesions and injury mechanism, instability at presentation, recurrent instability and family history were assessed with multivariable logistic regression. Preoperative MRI or MRA reports by radiologists were examined to determine if Down Under lesions were identified.
Oxford Shoulder Instability Scores indicated that most patients in both groups had little pain or shoulder problems postoperatively (average Oxford Score 41; 48 = no symptoms). Oxford Scores were not significantly different between the Down Under and non-Down Under groups. Four patients (22.2%) in the Down Under group had recurring symptoms (pain and instability) compared to 12 (10.6%) in the non-Down Under group; this difference was not statistically significant (adjusted OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.19,4.77). Family history of shoulder instability was positively associated with a Down Under lesion (adjusted OR 5.0, 95%CI 1.51,16.7). MRI or MRA identified 52.9% of Down Under lesions.
Down Under lesions were an infrequent type of glenoid labral injury, yet postoperative outcomes were similar to other labral tears. Patients with Down Under lesions had a significant risk factor due to family history of shoulder instability. MRI and MRA could not reliably identify Down Under lesions.
Level III.
下盂唇撕裂是一种不常见但明确的肩部损伤。只有少数研究报告了关节镜下修复后的结果。本研究的目的是报告下盂唇修复后至少 2 年的结果,并比较与非下盂唇撕裂相关的结果和危险因素。还评估了术前 MRI 或 MRA 是否能识别下盂唇撕裂。
对 162 例连续行关节镜下盂唇修复术的患者进行前瞻性研究,排除单纯上盂唇撕裂。130 例可随访的患者中,18 例(13.7%)有下盂唇撕裂(“下Under 病变”),其余患者有前、后或混合前/后病变,但不包括下极。“下Under 病变”组的平均随访时间为 44 个月(SD 10,范围 27-57),非“下Under 病变”组为 30 个月(SD 14,范围 4-60)。术后结果包括牛津肩不稳定评分和复发性不稳定。采用多变量逻辑回归评估“下Under 病变”与损伤机制、术前不稳定、复发性不稳定和家族史之间的关系。检查放射科医生的术前 MRI 或 MRA 报告,以确定是否识别出“下Under 病变”。
牛津肩不稳定评分显示,两组患者术后多数疼痛或肩部问题轻微(平均牛津评分为 41;48=无症状)。“下Under 病变”组和非“下Under 病变”组的牛津评分无显著差异。“下Under 病变”组有 4 例(22.2%)患者出现复发性症状(疼痛和不稳定),而非“下Under 病变”组有 12 例(10.6%);差异无统计学意义(校正 OR 1.09,95%CI 0.19,4.77)。肩不稳定家族史与“下Under 病变”呈正相关(校正 OR 5.0,95%CI 1.51,16.7)。MRI 或 MRA 可识别 52.9%的“下Under 病变”。
“下Under 病变”是一种少见的盂唇损伤类型,但术后结果与其他盂唇撕裂相似。“下Under 病变”患者因肩不稳定家族史而存在显著的危险因素。MRI 和 MRA 不能可靠地识别“下Under 病变”。
III 级。