• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腰椎骨 SPECT 定量测定中不进行衰减和散射校正的交叉标定系数优化:与衰减和散射校正的对头比较。

Optimization of cross-calibration factor for quantitative bone SPECT without attenuation and scatter correction in the lumbar spine: head-to-head comparison with attenuation and scatter correction.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Toyohashi Municipal Hospital, Aichi.

Department of Quantum Medical Technology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa University, Ishikawa.

出版信息

Nucl Med Commun. 2021 Dec 1;42(12):1404-1416. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000001480.

DOI:10.1097/MNM.0000000000001480
PMID:34456319
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Quantitative single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) with computed tomography (SPECT/CT) is known to improve diagnostic performance. Although SPECT-alone systems are used widely, accurate quantitative SPECT using these systems is challenging. This study aimed to improve the accuracy of quantitative bone SPECT of the lumbar spine with the SPECT-alone system.

METHODS

The cross-calibration factor (CCF) was measured using three kinds of phantoms and the optimal values were determined. The recovery coefficient with and without attenuation and scatter correction (ACSC) were compared. Bone SPECT/CT was performed on 93 consecutive patients with prostate cancer, and the standardized uptake values (SUVs) were compared using the respective CCFs. The first 60 patients were classified according to body weight, and the correlation coefficient between SUVs with and without ACSC were calculated; the slopes were defined as body weight-based coefficients (BWCs). In the remaining 33 patients, the SUV was adjusted according to BWC, and the accuracy of the adjustment was verified.

RESULTS

The quantitative SPECT values obtained from the CCF using SIM2 bone phantom showed nearly accurate radioactivity concentrations, even without ACSC. The recovery coefficients with and without ACSC were similar. Unadjusted SUVs with and without ACSC were strongly correlated; however, SUVs without ACSC were significantly higher than those with ACSC (P < 0.0001). The mean difference between the SUVs with and without ACSC disappeared when the SUVs without ACSC were adjusted by BWC (P = 0.9814).

CONCLUSIONS

Our cross-calibration method for quantitative bone SPECT enables interpretation with a harmonized SUV even in SPECT-alone systems.

摘要

目的

定量单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)与计算机断层扫描(SPECT/CT)结合可提高诊断性能。虽然单独使用 SPECT 系统的情况很常见,但使用这些系统进行准确的定量 SPECT 具有一定挑战性。本研究旨在提高单独使用 SPECT 系统进行腰椎骨定量 SPECT 的准确性。

方法

使用三种模型测量了交叉校准因子(CCF)并确定了最佳值。比较了有和没有衰减和散射校正(ACSC)的恢复系数。对 93 例连续前列腺癌患者进行了 SPECT/CT 检查,并使用各自的 CCF 比较了标准化摄取值(SUV)。根据体重将前 60 例患者进行分类,并计算了有无 ACSC 的 SUV 之间的相关系数;斜率定义为基于体重的系数(BWC)。在其余 33 例患者中,根据 BWC 调整 SUV,并验证调整的准确性。

结果

使用 SIM2 骨模型的 CCF 获得的定量 SPECT 值即使没有 ACSC 也显示出几乎准确的放射性浓度。有无 ACSC 的恢复系数相似。有无 ACSC 的 SUV 之间具有很强的相关性,但没有 ACSC 的 SUV 明显高于有 ACSC 的 SUV(P <0.0001)。当没有 ACSC 的 SUV 通过 BWC 进行调整时,SUV 与无 ACSC 之间的平均差异消失(P=0.9814)。

结论

我们的定量骨 SPECT 交叉校准方法可在单独使用 SPECT 系统的情况下进行解释,即使没有 SUV 也能进行解释。

相似文献

1
Optimization of cross-calibration factor for quantitative bone SPECT without attenuation and scatter correction in the lumbar spine: head-to-head comparison with attenuation and scatter correction.腰椎骨 SPECT 定量测定中不进行衰减和散射校正的交叉标定系数优化:与衰减和散射校正的对头比较。
Nucl Med Commun. 2021 Dec 1;42(12):1404-1416. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000001480.
2
[Improvement of Standardized Uptake Value Accuracy in the Tc Body SPECT and SPECT/CT: Optimization of the Phantom for Calculating Becquerel Calibration Factor and Correction Method].[改善Tc全身SPECT及SPECT/CT中标准化摄取值的准确性:用于计算贝可勒尔校准因子的体模优化及校正方法]
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2021;77(9):921-931. doi: 10.6009/jjrt.2021_JSRT_77.9.921.
3
Quantitative evaluation of single-photon emission computed tomography findings in lower extremity possible without computed tomography-based attenuation correction.无需基于 CT 的衰减校正即可对下肢单光子发射计算机断层扫描结果进行定量评估。
Nucl Med Commun. 2021 Oct 1;42(10):1097-1103. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000001440.
4
Examination of cross-calibration and concentration linearity with quantitative gallium-67 single-photon emission computed tomography: phantom experiment.定量镓-67 单光子发射计算机断层扫描的交叉定标和浓度线性度检查:体模实验。
Radiol Phys Technol. 2020 Dec;13(4):385-391. doi: 10.1007/s12194-020-00582-3. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
5
Validation of a calibration method using the cross-calibration factor and system planar sensitivity in quantitative single-photon emission computed tomography imaging.在定量单光子发射计算机断层成像中使用交叉校准因子和系统平面灵敏度对校准方法进行验证。
Radiol Phys Technol. 2017 Dec;10(4):439-445. doi: 10.1007/s12194-017-0416-3. Epub 2017 Aug 18.
6
Quantification evaluation of Tc-MDP concentration in the lumbar spine with SPECT/CT: compare with bone mineral density.SPECT/CT 定量评估腰椎 Tc-MDP 浓度:与骨密度比较。
Ann Nucl Med. 2020 Feb;34(2):136-143. doi: 10.1007/s12149-019-01425-x. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
7
Quantitatively accurate activity measurements with a dedicated cardiac SPECT camera: Physical phantom experiments.使用专用心脏单光子发射计算机断层扫描相机进行定量准确的活性测量:物理体模实验。
Med Phys. 2016 Jan;43(1):44. doi: 10.1118/1.4937601.
8
Cardiac I-MIBG planar heart to mediastinum ratios depend on patient size; phantom studies suggest SPECT-CT could improve quantification.心脏 I-MIBG 平面心脏与纵隔比值取决于患者体型;体模研究表明 SPECT-CT 可改善定量分析。
Biomed Phys Eng Express. 2019 Dec 19;6(1):015011. doi: 10.1088/2057-1976/ab5c09.
9
Quantitative accuracy of clinical 99mTc SPECT/CT using ordered-subset expectation maximization with 3-dimensional resolution recovery, attenuation, and scatter correction.采用有序子集期望最大化三维分辨率恢复、衰减和散射校正的临床 99mTc SPECT/CT 的定量准确性。
J Nucl Med. 2010 Jun;51(6):921-8. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.109.071571. Epub 2010 May 19.
10
Characteristics of iodine-123 IQ-SPECT/CT imaging compared with conventional SPECT/CT.与传统SPECT/CT相比,碘-123 IQ-SPECT/CT成像的特点。
Ann Nucl Med. 2019 Feb;33(2):103-111. doi: 10.1007/s12149-018-1310-8. Epub 2018 Oct 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Detectability of cold tumors by xSPECT bone technology compared with hot tumors: a supine phantom study.xSPECT 骨技术检测冷肿瘤与热肿瘤的比较:仰卧位体模研究。
Phys Eng Sci Med. 2024 Mar;47(1):287-294. doi: 10.1007/s13246-023-01364-y. Epub 2023 Dec 20.
2
Comparison of the detectability of hot lesions on bone SPECT using six state-of-the-art SPECT/CT systems: a multicenter phantom study to optimize reconstruction parameters.比较六种最先进的 SPECT/CT 系统对骨 SPECT 热病变检测能力:一项优化重建参数的多中心体模研究。
Phys Eng Sci Med. 2023 Jun;46(2):839-849. doi: 10.1007/s13246-023-01257-0. Epub 2023 May 1.
3
Verification of the effect of acquisition time for SwiftScan on quantitative bone single-photon emission computed tomography using an anthropomorphic phantom.
使用人体模型验证SwiftScan采集时间对定量骨单光子发射计算机断层扫描的影响。
EJNMMI Phys. 2022 Jul 30;9(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s40658-022-00477-9.
4
Evaluation of quantitative accuracy among different scatter corrections for quantitative bone SPECT/CT imaging.不同散射校正方法在定量骨 SPECT/CT 成像中的定量准确性评估。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 6;17(6):e0269542. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269542. eCollection 2022.