Suppr超能文献

开放性胸小肌下肱二头肌固定术后早期与延迟主动活动范围

Early Versus Delayed Active Range of Motion After Open Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis.

作者信息

Keeling Laura E, Looney Austin M, Curley Andrew J, Ehlers Cooper B, Galel Alexandra M, Khalafallah Youssef M, Vippa Tarun K, Bryant Brandon J, Chang Edward S

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington DC, USA.

Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Aug 25;9(8):23259671211026619. doi: 10.1177/23259671211026619. eCollection 2021 Aug.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Little is known regarding the effect of early active elbow range of motion (ROM) protocols on failure rates and outcomes after open subpectoral biceps tenodesis.

HYPOTHESIS

We hypothesized that patients managed using an early active ROM protocol after open subpectoral biceps tenodesis would demonstrate similar failure rates and functional outcomes compared to patients managed using a traditional delayed active ROM protocol.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

We evaluated 63 patients who underwent open subpectoral biceps tenodesis with unicortical suture button fixation. Based on surgeon preference, 22 patients were managed using an early active motion protocol consisting of no restrictions on elbow flexion or forearm supination, while 41 patients were managed using a delayed motion protocol postoperatively. Primary outcome measures included failure of biceps tenodesis and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) scores. Secondary outcomes included shoulder and elbow ROM at 6 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up for the 63 patients was 24.2 months postoperatively. One patient (2.4%) in the delayed active motion cohort and no patients in the early active motion cohort experienced failure. Final outcome scores as well as 6-month shoulder and elbow ROM indicated excellent functional outcomes, with no significant difference between motion cohorts. The median postoperative ASES scores were 97.99 in the early active motion cohort (mean ± standard deviation [SD], 95.49 ± 7.68) and 95.42 in the delayed motion cohort (mean ± SD, 90.93 ± 16.08), while median postoperative SANE scores were 96 in the early motion cohort (mean ± SD, 94.23 ± 6.68) and 95 in the delayed motion cohort (mean ± SD, 88.39 ± 17.98). Subgroup analysis demonstrated no significant difference in outcome scores based on the performance of concomitant rotator cuff repair or hand dominance.

CONCLUSION

Early active ROM after open subpectoral biceps tenodesis with unicortical suture button fixation resulted in low failure rates and excellent clinical outcomes, comparable to the results of patients managed using delayed active ROM protocols. This suggests that patients undergoing open subpectoral biceps tenodesis may be managed using either early or delayed active motion protocols without compromising functional outcome.

摘要

背景

关于早期主动肘关节活动范围(ROM)方案对开放性胸大肌下肱二头肌固定术后失败率和预后的影响,目前所知甚少。

假设

我们假设,与采用传统延迟主动ROM方案治疗的患者相比,开放性胸大肌下肱二头肌固定术后采用早期主动ROM方案治疗的患者将表现出相似的失败率和功能预后。

研究设计

队列研究;证据等级,3级。

方法

我们评估了63例行开放性胸大肌下肱二头肌固定术并采用单皮质缝合纽扣固定的患者。根据外科医生的偏好,22例患者采用早期主动活动方案治疗,该方案对肘关节屈曲或前臂旋后无限制,而41例患者术后采用延迟活动方案治疗。主要结局指标包括肱二头肌固定失败以及美国肩肘外科医师学会(ASES)和单项评估数值评定(SANE)评分。次要结局指标包括术后6个月时的肩、肘关节ROM。

结果

63例患者术后平均随访24.2个月。延迟主动活动组有1例患者(2.4%)出现失败,早期主动活动组无患者出现失败。最终结局评分以及术后6个月时的肩、肘关节ROM均表明功能预后良好,不同活动组之间无显著差异。早期主动活动组术后ASES评分中位数为97.99(均值±标准差[SD],95.49±7.68),延迟活动组为95.42(均值±SD,90.93±16.08),而早期活动组术后SANE评分中位数为96(均值±SD,94.23±6.68),延迟活动组为95(均值±SD,88.39±17.98)。亚组分析表明,根据是否同时进行肩袖修复或利手情况,结局评分无显著差异。

结论

开放性胸大肌下肱二头肌固定术采用单皮质缝合纽扣固定后早期主动ROM导致失败率低且临床预后良好,与采用延迟主动ROM方案治疗的患者结果相当。这表明,接受开放性胸大肌下肱二头肌固定术的患者可采用早期或延迟主动活动方案治疗,而不会影响功能预后。

相似文献

1
Early Versus Delayed Active Range of Motion After Open Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis.
Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Aug 25;9(8):23259671211026619. doi: 10.1177/23259671211026619. eCollection 2021 Aug.
3
Arthroscopic proximal versus open subpectoral biceps tenodesis with arthroscopic repair of small- or medium-sized rotator cuff tears.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Dec;24(12):3772-3778. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3641-5. Epub 2015 Jun 4.
4
Clinical outcomes after subpectoral biceps tenodesis with an interference screw.
Am J Sports Med. 2008 Oct;36(10):1922-9. doi: 10.1177/0363546508318192. Epub 2008 Aug 12.
6
Biomechanical Comparison of Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis Onlay Techniques.
Orthop J Sports Med. 2019 Oct 15;7(10):2325967119876276. doi: 10.1177/2325967119876276. eCollection 2019 Oct.
9
Management of Failed Proximal Biceps Surgery: Clinical Outcomes After Revision to Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis.
Am J Sports Med. 2020 Feb;48(2):460-465. doi: 10.1177/0363546519892922. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
10
Evaluation of Rotator Cuff Repair With and Without Concomitant Biceps Intervention: A Retrospective Review of Patient Outcomes.
Am J Sports Med. 2022 May;50(6):1534-1540. doi: 10.1177/03635465221085661. Epub 2022 Apr 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Biceps tenodesis versus tenotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of level I randomized controlled trials.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 May;30(5):951-960. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.11.012. Epub 2020 Dec 26.
4
A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing the Interference Screw and Suture Anchor Techniques for Biceps Tenodesis.
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Feb;45(2):440-448. doi: 10.1177/0363546516667577. Epub 2016 Oct 22.
5
Arthroscopic tenodesis versus tenotomy of the long head of biceps tendon in simultaneous rotator cuff repair.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016 Jan;136(1):101-6. doi: 10.1007/s00402-015-2343-2. Epub 2015 Oct 24.
6
Demographic trends in arthroscopic and open biceps tenodesis across the United States.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Oct;24(10):e279-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.04.021. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
7
All-arthroscopic suprapectoral versus open subpectoral tenodesis of the long head of the biceps brachii.
Am J Sports Med. 2015 May;43(5):1077-83. doi: 10.1177/0363546515570024. Epub 2015 Mar 29.
8
Subpectoral biceps tenodesis for bicipital tendonitis with SLAP tear.
Orthopedics. 2015 Jan;38(1):e48-53. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20150105-60.
9
Trends in long head biceps tenodesis.
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Mar;43(3):570-8. doi: 10.1177/0363546514560155. Epub 2014 Dec 12.
10
Surgical indications for long head biceps tenodesis: a systematic review.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Jul;24(7):2156-66. doi: 10.1007/s00167-014-3383-9. Epub 2014 Nov 23.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验