• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

How to Motivate Equity in Health Decision Modeling.

作者信息

Field Robert I

机构信息

Professor of law and professor of health management and policy at the Thomas R. Kline School of Law and the Dornsife School of Public Health at Drexel University in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

AMA J Ethics. 2021 Aug 1;23(8):E648-652. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2021.648.

DOI:10.1001/amajethics.2021.648
PMID:34459733
Abstract

American health care is rife with inequity in access to services. Even among people with insurance, inequity can result from insurers' decisions about which services to cover. These decisions are often based on economic models that are seemingly objective but neglect factors affecting people who are economically disadvantaged. Laws and government programs designed to mitigate inequities in access have limited value in addressing bias in models that inform coverage decisions. As a reform, government agencies that fund research could require that studies on which decision models are based better account for factors affecting people who are economically disadvantaged, an approach this article explores.

摘要

相似文献

1
How to Motivate Equity in Health Decision Modeling.
AMA J Ethics. 2021 Aug 1;23(8):E648-652. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2021.648.
2
Unmanaged care: towards moral fairness in health care coverage.非管理式医疗:迈向医疗覆盖中的道德公平。
Indiana Law J. 2003 Summer;78(2):659-721.
3
The effects of MCH insurance cards on improving equity in access and use of maternal and child health care services in Tanzania: a mixed methods analysis.妇幼保健保险卡在改善坦桑尼亚妇幼保健服务获取和利用公平性方面的作用:一项混合方法分析
J Health Popul Nutr. 2016 Nov 18;35(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s41043-016-0075-8.
4
Equity in health care access to: assessing the urban health insurance reform in China.医疗保健获取公平性:评估中国城市医疗保险改革
Soc Sci Med. 2002 Nov;55(10):1779-94. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(01)00306-9.
5
Universal health coverage in Turkey: enhancement of equity.土耳其的全民健康覆盖:增强公平性。
Lancet. 2013 Jul 6;382(9886):65-99. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61051-X. Epub 2013 Jun 27.
6
Inequity under equality: research on the benefits equity of Chinese basic medical insurance.不平等中的平等:中国基本医疗保险收益公平性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Aug 3;20(1):710. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05584-w.
7
Promising Practices in Equity in Mental Healthcare: Health Equity Impact Assessment.精神卫生保健公平性的成功实践:健康公平性影响评估
Healthc Pap. 2019 Sep;18(2):42-47. doi: 10.12927/hcpap.2019.25921.
8
How Economic Decision Modeling Can Facilitate Health Equity.经济决策建模如何促进健康公平。
AMA J Ethics. 2021 Aug 1;23(8):E624-630. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2021.624.
9
Outcome-based health equity across different social health insurance schemes for the elderly in China.中国老年人不同社会医疗保险计划基于结果的健康公平性。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Jan 14;16:9. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1261-5.
10
Research on the horizontal equity of inpatient benefits among NCMS enrollees in China: evidence from Shaanxi Province.中国新型农村合作医疗参保者住院待遇水平公平性研究:来自陕西省的证据
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Sep 19;18(1):726. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3534-7.