• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

纳武单抗在美国非小细胞肺癌患者中的成本效益。

Cost-effectiveness of nivolumab in patients with NSCLC in the United States.

作者信息

Chaudhary Mohammad A, Lubinga Solomon J, Smare Caitlin, Hertel Nadine, Penrod John R

机构信息

Bristol Myers Squibb, 3401 Princeton Pike, Lawrence Township, NJ 08648. Email:

出版信息

Am J Manag Care. 2021 Aug 1;27(8):e254-e260. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2021.88726.

DOI:10.37765/ajmc.2021.88726
PMID:34460179
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine the lifetime cost-effectiveness of nivolumab vs docetaxel in advanced squamous and nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following platinum-based chemotherapy from a US payer perspective.

STUDY DESIGN

Trial- and cohort-based cost-effectiveness analyses.

METHODS

The analyses used partitioned survival models with 3 mutually exclusive health states: progression free, progressed disease, and death. The mean starting age was 61 years. Clinical parameters were derived from the 2 registrational, randomized, phase 3 trials with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. Costs were derived from published literature. The primary outcomes were quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), life-years gained (LYG), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Costs and outcomes were discounted at 3% per annum. Uncertainty was examined using univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

In patients with squamous NSCLC, the use of nivolumab improved life-years (LYs) and QALYs by 1.23 and 0.99, respectively, compared with docetaxel. Costs were increased by $99,677, resulting in ICERs of $100,776 per QALY and $81,294 per LYG. In patients with nonsquamous NSCLC, nivolumab increased LYs and QALYs by 0.99 and 0.80, respectively. Costs were increased by $94,174, resulting in ICERs of $117,739 per QALY and $94,849 per LYG. ICERs were most sensitive to the discount rates applied to costs and outcomes. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of $150,000, nivolumab had probabilities of 91% and 99% of being cost-effective in patients with squamous and nonsquamous NSCLC, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Nivolumab is likely to be cost-effective for the treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC following platinum-based chemotherapy in the United States.

摘要

目的

从美国医保支付方的角度,确定纳武利尤单抗与多西他赛相比,在铂类化疗后的晚期鳞状和非鳞状非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)中的终生成本效益。

研究设计

基于试验和队列的成本效益分析。

方法

分析采用具有3种相互排斥健康状态的分割生存模型:无进展、疾病进展和死亡。平均起始年龄为61岁。临床参数来自2项注册的、随机的3期试验,最短随访期为5年。成本来自已发表的文献。主要结局为质量调整生命年(QALY)、获得的生命年(LYG)和增量成本效益比(ICER)。成本和结局按每年3%进行贴现。使用单因素和概率敏感性分析来检验不确定性。

结果

在鳞状NSCLC患者中,与多西他赛相比,使用纳武利尤单抗分别使生命年(LY)和QALY提高了1.23和0.99。成本增加了99,677美元,导致每QALY的ICER为100,776美元,每LYG的ICER为81,294美元。在非鳞状NSCLC患者中,纳武利尤单抗分别使LY和QALY提高了0.99和0.80。成本增加了94,174美元,导致每QALY的ICER为117,739美元,每LYG的ICER为94,849美元。ICER对应用于成本和结局的贴现率最为敏感。在支付意愿阈值为150,000美元时,纳武利尤单抗在鳞状和非鳞状NSCLC患者中具有成本效益的概率分别为91%和99%。

结论

在美国,纳武利尤单抗在铂类化疗后的晚期NSCLC患者治疗中可能具有成本效益。

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of nivolumab in patients with NSCLC in the United States.纳武单抗在美国非小细胞肺癌患者中的成本效益。
Am J Manag Care. 2021 Aug 1;27(8):e254-e260. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2021.88726.
2
Cost-effectiveness of nivolumab in squamous and non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in Canada and Sweden: an update with 5-year data.加拿大和瑞典的纳武利尤单抗在鳞状和非鳞状非小细胞肺癌中的成本效益:5 年数据更新。
J Med Econ. 2021 Jan-Dec;24(1):607-619. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2021.1917139.
3
Cost-effectiveness analysis of nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus platinum-doublet chemotherapy for first-line treatment of stage IV or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer in the United States.在美国,nivolumab 联合 ipilimumab 对比铂类双药化疗用于 IV 期或复发性非小细胞肺癌一线治疗的成本效果分析。
J Med Econ. 2022 Jan-Dec;25(1):703-711. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2022.2077549.
4
Cost-effectiveness analysis of nivolumab plus ipilimumab plus two cycles of platinum-doublet chemotherapy versus platinum-doublet chemotherapy alone for first-line treatment of stage IV or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer in the United States.在美国,nivolumab 联合 ipilimumab 加两个周期铂类双药化疗对比单纯铂类双药化疗一线治疗 IV 期或复发性非小细胞肺癌的成本效果分析。
J Med Econ. 2022 Jan-Dec;25(1):660-668. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2022.2048573.
5
Cost-effectiveness of Nivolumab-Ipilimumab Combination Therapy for the Treatment of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.纳武利尤单抗联合伊匹单抗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的成本效果分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 May 3;4(5):e218787. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.8787.
6
Cost-effectiveness of second-line atezolizumab in Canada for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).加拿大二线阿特珠单抗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的成本效益分析。
J Med Econ. 2019 Jul;22(7):625-637. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1590842. Epub 2019 Mar 25.
7
Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab versus standard-of-care chemotherapy for first-line treatment of PD-L1 positive (>50%) metastatic squamous and non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in France.帕博利珠单抗对比标准治疗化疗用于 PD-L1 阳性(>50%)转移性鳞状和非鳞状非小细胞肺癌一线治疗的成本效果分析。在法国。
Lung Cancer. 2019 Jan;127:44-52. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2018.11.008. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
8
Nivolumab Versus Docetaxel for Previously Treated Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in China: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.纳武利尤单抗对比多西他赛用于中国既往治疗的晚期非小细胞肺癌:一项成本效果分析。
Clin Drug Investig. 2020 Feb;40(2):129-137. doi: 10.1007/s40261-019-00869-3.
9
Modelled Economic Evaluation of Nivolumab for the Treatment of Second-Line Advanced or Metastatic Squamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in Australia Using Both Partition Survival and Markov Models.澳大利亚应用分区生存模型和马尔可夫模型对纳武利尤单抗二线治疗晚期或转移性鳞状非小细胞肺癌的建模经济学评价。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2019 Jun;17(3):371-380. doi: 10.1007/s40258-018-0452-0.
10
Toripalimab plus chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A cost-effectiveness analysis.托瑞帕利单抗联合化疗与单纯化疗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的成本效益分析。
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Feb 14;14:1131219. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1131219. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Toripalimab Plus Axitinib for Patients with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma in the United States.托法替布联合阿昔替尼治疗美国晚期肾细胞癌患者的成本效益分析。
Clin Drug Investig. 2025 Jul 19. doi: 10.1007/s40261-025-01464-5.
2
Estimating the Cost-Effectiveness of Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) Therapy with an Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor or Docetaxel in Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.评估肿瘤治疗电场(TTFields)联合免疫检查点抑制剂或多西他赛治疗转移性非小细胞肺癌的成本效益。
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2025 Feb 5;17:55-68. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S501532. eCollection 2025.
3
Cost-effectiveness analysis of selpercatinib versus chemotherapy and pembrolizumab in the first-line treatment of rearranged during transfection fusion-positive non-small cell lung cancer in the United States.
在美国,针对转染重排阳性非小细胞肺癌的一线治疗中,塞尔帕替尼与化疗和帕博利珠单抗的成本效益分析。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2024 Dec;46(6):1427-1435. doi: 10.1007/s11096-024-01800-3. Epub 2024 Oct 1.
4
Cost-effectiveness analysis of amivantamab plus chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer patients with epidermal growth factor receptor exon 20 insertions in the United States.在美国,评估阿美替尼联合化疗用于表皮生长因子受体外显子 20 插入突变的非小细胞肺癌患者的成本效果分析。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2024 Dec;46(6):1335-1344. doi: 10.1007/s11096-024-01761-7. Epub 2024 Jul 11.
5
Economic evaluation of cemiplimab plus chemotherapy regimen for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.西妥昔单抗联合化疗方案治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的经济学评价。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Feb 21;24(1):236. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-11992-6.
6
Artificial Intelligence to Automate Health Economic Modelling: A Case Study to Evaluate the Potential Application of Large Language Models.人工智能实现健康经济建模自动化:评估大语言模型潜在应用的案例研究
Pharmacoecon Open. 2024 Mar;8(2):191-203. doi: 10.1007/s41669-024-00477-8. Epub 2024 Feb 10.
7
Evaluating the impact of PD-1 inhibitor treatment on key health outcomes for cancer patients in China.评估 PD-1 抑制剂治疗对中国癌症患者关键健康结局的影响。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2024 Apr;46(2):429-438. doi: 10.1007/s11096-023-01675-w. Epub 2024 Jan 2.
8
Whether and How Disutilities of Adverse Events were Used in the Economic Evaluation of Drug Therapy for Cancer Treatment.不良事件的非功利性是否及如何用于癌症治疗药物治疗的经济评价。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2023 Mar;41(3):295-306. doi: 10.1007/s40273-022-01232-9. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
9
Cost-Effectiveness of Tepotinib Versus Capmatinib for the Treatment of Adult Patients With Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Harboring Mesenchymal-Epithelial Transition Exon 14 Skipping.替泊替尼与卡马替尼治疗携间质-上皮转化外显子 14 跳跃的转移性非小细胞肺癌成人患者的成本-效果分析
Value Health. 2023 Apr;26(4):487-497. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.11.018. Epub 2022 Dec 8.