From the Wills Eye Hospital, Mid Atlantic Retina, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
From the Wills Eye Hospital, Mid Atlantic Retina, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2022 Mar;235:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.08.012. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
To evaluate outcomes of eyes that developed endophthalmitis after intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections that were managed without microbiologic cultures.
Retrospective, single-center, comparative cohort study.
We included all eyes with postinjection endophthalmitis from July 1, 2013, to September 1, 2019. Endophthalmitis cases were divided into the culture group if treated with intravitreal antibiotics and a vitreous or aqueous tap sent for microbiologic sampling or into the no culture group if treated with immediate injection of intravitreal antibiotics with an anterior chamber paracentesis that was not sent for microbiologic sampling. The main outcome measures were visual acuity, the incidence of retinal detachment, and the need for additional procedures.
Of 165 endophthalmitis cases identified, 119 (72%) were in the culture group and 46 (28%) were in the no culture group. At endophthalmitis presentation, eyes in the culture group had a mean logMAR VA of 1.98 (∼20/1900) compared with 1.90 (∼20/1600) for eyes in the no culture group (P = .589). At the 6-month follow-up, the mean vision loss was 5.5 lines lost from baseline for the culture group compared with 2.5 lines lost for the no culture group (P = .017). Eyes in the culture group required a subsequent pars plana vitrectomy in 29 of 119 cases (24%) compared with 7 of 46 cases (15%) in the no culture group (P = .29). Six of 119 eyes (5%) in the culture group developed secondary retinal detachments compared with none in the no culture group (P = .143).
When access to microbiologic facility is not available, the management of postinjection endophthalmitis using intravitreal antibiotics without microbiologic cultures may be an acceptable treatment strategy.
评估未经微生物培养而接受抗血管内皮生长因子玻璃体内注射后发生眼内炎的眼的结局。
回顾性、单中心、比较队列研究。
我们纳入了 2013 年 7 月 1 日至 2019 年 9 月 1 日期间所有接受注射后眼内炎治疗的眼。如果采用玻璃体或房水抽吸送微生物取样进行眼内抗生素治疗,则将眼内炎病例分为培养组;如果采用立即进行眼内抗生素注射联合前房穿刺但不送微生物取样,则将眼内炎病例分为无培养组。主要观察指标为视力、视网膜脱离的发生率和需要进行的额外手术。
在 165 例眼内炎病例中,119 例(72%)为培养组,46 例(28%)为无培养组。在眼内炎发作时,培养组眼的平均 logMAR 视力为 1.98(约 20/1900),而无培养组眼的平均 logMAR 视力为 1.90(约 20/1600)(P=0.589)。在 6 个月的随访时,培养组视力平均损失 5.5 行,而无培养组视力平均损失 2.5 行(P=0.017)。在培养组中,119 例中有 29 例(24%)需要进行后续的玻璃体切除术,而在无培养组中,46 例中有 7 例(15%)需要进行玻璃体切除术(P=0.29)。在培养组中,有 6 例(5%)眼发生继发性视网膜脱离,而在无培养组中无眼发生视网膜脱离(P=0.143)。
在无法获得微生物学设施的情况下,采用未经微生物培养的眼内抗生素治疗注射后眼内炎可能是一种可接受的治疗策略。