Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Department of Cardiology, Green Lane Cardiovascular Unit, Auckland, New Zealand.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021 Oct;16(10):1491-1501. doi: 10.2215/CJN.01930221. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
In a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, treatment with spironolactone in early-stage CKD reduced left ventricular mass and arterial stiffness compared with placebo. It is not known if these effects were due to BP reduction or specific vascular and myocardial effects of spironolactone.
DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: A prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end point study conducted in four UK centers (Birmingham, Cambridge, Edinburgh, and London) comparing spironolactone 25 mg to chlorthalidone 25 mg once daily for 40 weeks in 154 participants with nondiabetic stage 2 and 3 CKD (eGFR 30-89 ml/min per 1.73 m). The primary end point was change in left ventricular mass on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Participants were on treatment with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker and had controlled BP (target ≤130/80 mm Hg).
There was no significant difference in left ventricular mass regression; at week 40, the adjusted mean difference for spironolactone compared with chlorthalidone was -3.8 g (95% confidence interval, -8.1 to 0.5 g, =0.08). Office and 24-hour ambulatory BPs fell in response to both drugs with no significant differences between treatment. Pulse wave velocity was not significantly different between groups; at week 40, the adjusted mean difference for spironolactone compared with chlorthalidone was 0.04 m/s (-0.4 m/s, 0.5 m/s, =0.90). Hyperkalemia (defined ≥5.4 mEq/L) occurred more frequently with spironolactone (12 versus two participants, adjusted relative risk was 5.5, 95% confidence interval, 1.4 to 22.1, =0.02), but there were no patients with severe hyperkalemia (defined ≥6.5 mEq/L). A decline in eGFR >30% occurred in eight participants treated with chlorthalidone compared with two participants with spironolactone (adjusted relative risk was 0.2, 95% confidence interval, 0.05 to 1.1, =0.07).
Spironolactone was not superior to chlorthalidone in reducing left ventricular mass, BP, or arterial stiffness in nondiabetic CKD.
在一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验中,与安慰剂相比,在早期 CKD 中使用螺内酯治疗可降低左心室质量和动脉僵硬度。尚不清楚这些效果是否归因于血压降低或螺内酯的特定血管和心肌作用。
设计、设置、参与者和测量:在英国的四个中心(伯明翰、剑桥、爱丁堡和伦敦)进行了一项前瞻性、随机、开放标签、盲终点研究,将 154 名非糖尿病 2 期和 3 期 CKD(eGFR 30-89 ml/min/1.73 m)患者随机分为每天一次螺内酯 25mg 与氯噻酮 25mg 治疗组,进行 40 周。主要终点为心脏磁共振成像上左心室质量的变化。参与者正在接受血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂或血管紧张素受体阻滞剂治疗,且血压控制良好(目标≤130/80mmHg)。
左心室质量的回归没有显著差异;在第 40 周时,螺内酯与氯噻酮相比的调整平均差异为-3.8g(95%置信区间,-8.1 至 0.5g,=0.08)。两种药物均可降低办公室和 24 小时动态血压,且治疗之间无显著差异。两组之间脉搏波速度没有显著差异;在第 40 周时,螺内酯与氯噻酮相比的调整平均差异为 0.04m/s(-0.4m/s,0.5m/s,=0.90)。螺内酯更常发生高钾血症(定义为≥5.4mEq/L)(12 名患者与 2 名患者,调整后的相对风险为 5.5,95%置信区间为 1.4 至 22.1,=0.02),但无严重高钾血症(定义为≥6.5mEq/L)患者。与氯噻酮治疗的 8 名患者相比,有 2 名患者的 eGFR 下降超过 30%(调整后的相对风险为 0.2,95%置信区间为 0.05 至 1.1,=0.07)。
在非糖尿病 CKD 中,螺内酯在降低左心室质量、血压或动脉僵硬度方面并不优于氯噻酮。