Cha Elliot D K, Lynch Conor P, Jadczak Caroline N, Mohan Shruthi, Geoghegan Cara E, Singh Kern
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Asian Spine J. 2022 Aug;16(4):478-485. doi: 10.31616/asj.2021.0138. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
Retrospective cohort.
To investigate the impact of meeting a patient's preoperative expectations for back or leg pain or the achievement of minimum clinically important difference (MCID) on patient satisfaction following lumbar fusion.
Few studies have compared if MCID achievement or meeting preoperative expectations for pain reduction affects patient satisfaction.
A surgical database was reviewed for eligible patients who underwent lumbar fusion. Patient satisfaction and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for back and leg pain were the outcomes of interest. Meeting expectations was calculated as a difference of ≤0 between preoperative expectations and postoperative VAS scores. MCID achievement was calculated by comparing changes in VAS scores with established values. Meeting preoperative expectations or MCID achievement as predictors of patient satisfaction was evaluated using regression analysis.
A total of 134 patients were included in this study. Patients demonstrated significant improvements in VAS back and VAS leg (p<0.001). At 1 year, 56.4% of patients had their VAS back expectations met compared with 59.5% for VAS leg. Similarly, at 1 year, 77.3% and 71.3% of patients achieved MCID for VAS back and leg, respectively. Meeting expectations for VAS back was significantly associated with patient satisfaction at all postoperative timepoints; however, MCID achievement only demonstrated a significant association with patient satisfaction at 6 and 12 weeks (all, p≤0.024). Meeting VAS leg expectations and MCID achievement both demonstrated a significant association with patient satisfaction at all postoperative timepoints (all, p≤0.02). No differences between MCID achievement and meeting expectations as predictors of satisfaction were noted.
The majority of patients achieved MCID and had their back and leg pain expectations met by 1 year. Both measures were significant predictors of patient satisfaction and suggest that MCID achievement may act as a suitable substitute for patient satisfaction.
回顾性队列研究。
探讨达到患者术前对背痛或腿痛的期望或实现最小临床重要差异(MCID)对腰椎融合术后患者满意度的影响。
很少有研究比较实现MCID或达到术前疼痛减轻期望是否会影响患者满意度。
回顾手术数据库,筛选接受腰椎融合术的符合条件患者。患者满意度以及背部和腿部疼痛的视觉模拟量表(VAS)是感兴趣的结果指标。期望达成的计算方法是术前期望与术后VAS评分之间的差异≤0。通过将VAS评分的变化与既定值进行比较来计算MCID的达成情况。使用回归分析评估达到术前期望或MCID达成作为患者满意度预测指标的情况。
本研究共纳入134例患者。患者的VAS背部和VAS腿部评分有显著改善(p<0.001)。1年时,56.4%的患者VAS背部期望达成,而VAS腿部期望达成率为59.5%。同样,1年时,分别有77.3%和71.3%的患者VAS背部和腿部达到MCID。在所有术后时间点,达到VAS背部期望与患者满意度显著相关;然而,MCID达成仅在6周和12周时与患者满意度显著相关(所有p≤0.024)。达到VAS腿部期望和MCID达成在所有术后时间点均与患者满意度显著相关(所有p≤0.02)。未发现MCID达成和达到期望作为满意度预测指标之间存在差异。
大多数患者在1年时达到MCID,并且其背部和腿部疼痛期望得到满足。这两种指标都是患者满意度的重要预测指标,表明MCID达成可能是患者满意度的合适替代指标。