Jardaly Achraf, Arguello Alexandra, Ponce Brent A, Leitch Kellie, McGwin Gerald, Gilbert Shawn R
From the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Mississippi, Oxford, Mississippi.
J Patient Saf. 2022 Apr 1;18(3):225-229. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000896.
Operating room (OR) fires are considered "never events," but approximately 650 events occur annually in the United States. Our aim was to detail fires occurring during orthopedic procedures via a questionnaire because of the limited information present on this topic.
A 25-question survey on witnessing surgical fires, hospital policies on surgical fires, and surgeons' perspective on OR fires was sent to 617 orthopedic surgeons in 18 institutions whose residency program is a member of the Collaborative Orthopaedic Educational Research Group. The response rate was 28%, with 172 surgeons having completed the survey.
Twelve of the 172 orthopedic surgeons surveyed reported witnessing at least 1 surgical fire in an OR setting. Electrocautery was the leading ignition source, causing fires in 7 events. A saw, laser, and light source were reported to have caused 1 fire each. Regarding fuel source for the fires, bone cement was a common culprit (n = 4), followed by gauze (n = 3). Oxygen delivery to patients was via a closed system in most cases (n = 9). No patient harm was reported in any of these cases.Just under half of the respondents (47.7%) reported not receiving any formal OR fire prevention or response training. The most common answer for frequency of concern about a surgical fire was "never" (42.4%).
Fires pose a risk in surgery, even in an orthopedics setting. Room oxygen can supply enough oxidizing power for a fire to occur, especially with the ubiquitous nature of ignition sources and fuels in the OR. Prevention is key with these events. Operating room personnel education must be sought, and surgeons should be mindful of the fire components in the OR.
手术室火灾被视为“绝不应该发生的事件”,但在美国每年约发生650起此类事件。由于关于这一主题的现有信息有限,我们的目标是通过问卷调查详细了解骨科手术过程中发生的火灾情况。
向18家机构的617名骨科医生发送了一份包含25个问题的调查问卷,内容涉及目击手术火灾情况、医院关于手术火灾的政策以及外科医生对手术室火灾的看法。这些机构的住院医师培训项目是骨科教育协作研究组的成员。回复率为28%,172名外科医生完成了调查。
在接受调查的172名骨科医生中,有12人报告在手术室环境中至少目击过1起手术火灾。电灼是主要的起火源,在7起事件中引发火灾。据报告,锯、激光和光源各引发1起火灾。关于火灾的燃料源,骨水泥是常见的罪魁祸首(n = 4),其次是纱布(n = 3)。在大多数情况下(n = 9),患者的氧气输送是通过封闭系统进行的。在这些案例中均未报告有患者受到伤害。略少于一半的受访者(47.7%)报告未接受过任何正式的手术室火灾预防或应对培训。对手术火灾担忧频率的最常见回答是“从不”(42.4%)。
火灾在手术中构成风险,即使是在骨科手术环境中。室内氧气可为火灾提供足够的氧化能力,尤其是考虑到手术室中起火源和燃料普遍存在的情况。预防是应对这些事件的关键。必须对手术室人员进行教育,外科医生应留意手术室中的火灾要素。