School of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Liver Foundation, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 2;16(9):e0256795. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256795. eCollection 2021.
Achieving targets set in the End TB Strategy is still a distant goal for many Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs). The importance of strengthening public-private partnership by engaging all identified providers in Tuberculosis (TB) care has long been advocated in global TB policies and strategies. However, Informal Healthcare Providers (IPs) are not yet prioritised and engaged in National Tuberculosis Programs (NTPs) globally. There exists a substantial body of evidence that confirms an important contribution of IPs in TB care. A systematic understanding of their role is necessary to ascertain their potential in improving TB care in LMICs. The purpose of this review is to scope the role of IPs in TB care. The scoping review was guided by a framework developed by the Joanna Briggs Institute. An electronic search of literature was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Global Health, CINAHL, and Web of Science. Of a total 5234 records identified and retrieved, 92 full-text articles were screened, of which 13 were included in the final review. An increasing trend was observed in publication over time, with most published between 2010-2019. In 60% of the articles, NTPs were mentioned as a collaborator in the study. For detection and diagnosis, IPs were primarily involved in identifying and referring patients. Administering DOT (Directly Observed Treatment) to the patient was the major task assigned to IPs for treatment and support. There is a paucity of evidence on prevention, as only one study involved IPs to perform this role. Traditional health providers were the most commonly featured, but there was not much variation in the role by provider type. All studies reported a positive role of IPs in improving TB care outcomes. This review demonstrates that IPs can be successfully engaged in various roles in TB care with appropriate support and training. Their contribution can support countries to achieve their national and global targets if prioritized in National TB Programs.
在许多中低收入国家(LMICs),实现《终止结核病策略》设定的目标仍然遥不可及。在全球结核病政策和战略中,长期以来一直倡导通过让所有已确定的提供者参与结核病(TB)护理来加强公私伙伴关系的重要性。然而,在全球范围内,非正式医疗提供者(IPs)尚未得到优先重视并参与国家结核病规划(NTPs)。有大量证据证实 IPs 在结核病护理中做出了重要贡献。系统了解其角色对于确定其在改善 LMICs 结核病护理方面的潜力是必要的。本综述的目的是确定 IPs 在结核病护理中的作用。该范围界定审查由 Joanna Briggs 研究所制定的框架指导。对 MEDLINE、EMBASE、SCOPUS、全球健康、CINAHL 和 Web of Science 中的文献进行了电子检索。在总共确定和检索的 5234 条记录中,筛选了 92 篇全文文章,其中 13 篇被纳入最终综述。随着时间的推移,发表的文章数量呈上升趋势,其中大部分发表于 2010-2019 年。在 60%的文章中,NTPs 被提及为研究中的合作者。在检测和诊断方面,IPs 主要参与识别和转介患者。为患者提供 DOT(直接观察治疗)是分配给 IPs 的主要治疗和支持任务。关于预防,证据很少,只有一项研究涉及 IPs 来发挥这一作用。传统的卫生提供者是最常见的,但提供者类型的角色没有太大变化。所有研究都报告了 IPs 在改善结核病护理结果方面的积极作用。本综述表明,在适当的支持和培训下,IPs 可以成功地参与结核病护理的各种角色。如果在国家结核病规划中得到优先重视,他们的贡献可以帮助各国实现国家和全球目标。