Institute for Human Movement and Medical Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata, Japan.
Department of Physical Therapy, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata, Japan; and.
J Strength Cond Res. 2022 Dec 1;36(12):3339-3344. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004123. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
Although foam rolling interventions with and without vibration have been used to increase flexibility in the field of sports, their effects on passive and active properties remain unclear. Hence, this study aimed to investigate the effects of foam rolling interventions on range of motion (ROM), shear elastic modulus, plantar flexor muscle strength, and jump performance. This randomized, controlled, crossover study included 16 healthy male participants who visited the laboratory three times (control condition, foam rolling condition, and vibration foam rolling condition), each with an interval of >72 h. In both foam rolling and vibration foam rolling conditions, participants were instructed to perform 60-s bouts of intervention for three sets, with 30-s rest between each set. In the vibration foam rolling condition, the intensity of vibration was set at a frequency of 48 Hz. Dorsiflexion (DF) ROM, shear elastic modulus, plantar flexor muscle strength, and drop jump height were determined before and after the rolling intervention. Our results showed a similar increase in DF ROM (p < 0.01, d = 0.51; p < 0.01, d = 0.65, respectively) and passive torque at DF ROM (p = 0.02, d = 0.51 and p < 0.01, d = 0.65, respectively) after foam rolling and vibration foam rolling. Medial gastrocnemius shear elastic modulus decreased only after vibration foam rolling (p < 0.01, d = 0.44). No significant main effects of time were observed in maximal voluntary isometric contraction torque (F = 2.0, p = 0.15, η = 0.119) and drop jump height (F = 1.5, p = 0.24, η = 0.091) after both interventions. Maximal voluntary concentric contraction torque showed a significant main effect of time (F = 7.59, p = 0.02, η = 0.336). However, only after foam rolling, the maximal voluntary concentric contraction torque significantly decreased (p = 0.01, d = 0.39). Our results suggest that vibration foam rolling effectively alters passive muscle properties without decreasing muscle strength and performance.
虽然在运动领域中已经使用了带有和不带有振动的泡沫轴滚动干预来增加柔韧性,但它们对被动和主动特性的影响仍不清楚。因此,本研究旨在调查泡沫轴滚动干预对运动范围(ROM)、剪切弹性模量、跖屈肌力量和跳跃性能的影响。这项随机、对照、交叉研究包括 16 名健康男性参与者,他们三次访问实验室(对照条件、泡沫轴滚动条件和振动泡沫轴滚动条件),每次间隔>72 小时。在泡沫轴滚动和振动泡沫轴滚动两种条件下,参与者均被指示进行 60 秒的干预,共三组,每组之间休息 30 秒。在振动泡沫轴滚动条件下,振动强度设置为 48 Hz 的频率。在滚动干预前后测定背屈(DF)ROM、剪切弹性模量、跖屈肌力量和纵跳高度。我们的结果显示,DF ROM 的增加相似(p<0.01,d=0.51;p<0.01,d=0.65,分别),DF ROM 时的被动扭矩也增加(p=0.02,d=0.51 和 p<0.01,d=0.65,分别),泡沫轴滚动和振动泡沫轴滚动后均如此。只有在振动泡沫轴滚动后,内侧腓肠肌的剪切弹性模量才会降低(p<0.01,d=0.44)。在两种干预后,最大自主等长收缩扭矩(F=2.0,p=0.15,η=0.119)和纵跳高度(F=1.5,p=0.24,η=0.091)均未观察到时间的主要影响。最大自主向心收缩扭矩显示出时间的显著主要影响(F=7.59,p=0.02,η=0.336)。然而,只有在泡沫轴滚动后,最大自主向心收缩扭矩才会显著降低(p=0.01,d=0.39)。我们的结果表明,振动泡沫轴滚动有效地改变了被动肌肉特性,而不会降低肌肉力量和性能。