Suppr超能文献

非血栓性下肢静脉疾病支架置入术后抗凝方案的比较。

Comparison of Anticoagulation Regimens Following Stent Placement for Nonthrombotic Lower Extremity Venous Disease.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, Stanford, California.

Department of Radiology, NYU Langone School of Medicine, New York, New York.

出版信息

J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2021 Nov;32(11):1584-1590. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2021.08.016. Epub 2021 Aug 31.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine whether subtherapeutic anticoagulation regimens are noninferior to therapeutic anticoagulation regimens following stent placement for nonthrombotic lower extremity venous disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-one consecutive patients (88% women; mean age, 44 years) who underwent stent placement for nonthrombotic lower extremity venous disease between 2002 and 2016 were retrospectively identified. The patients were divided into 2 cohorts: those who received prophylactic enoxaparin or no anticoagulation (subtherapeutic) after the procedure and those who received therapeutic doses of anticoagulation with enoxaparin, warfarin, and/or rivaroxaban (therapeutic) after the procedure. Baseline demographic characteristics, procedure characteristics, and outcomes were compared between the 2 groups using the Student t test, Fisher exact test, and χ test. The subtherapeutic and therapeutic anticoagulation groups did not differ significantly in the baseline demographic characteristics (eg, sex, race, and age) or procedure characteristics (eg, number of stents placed, stent brand, stent diameter, etc).

RESULTS

The mean clinical follow-up time was 4.4 years (range, 0-16.3 years). There were no thrombotic adverse events or luminal obstructions due to in-stent restenosis in either group. There were 5 minor bleeding adverse effects in the therapeutic group and no bleeding adverse effects in the subtherapeutic group (P = .051). There were no statistically significant differences in subjective symptom improvement (P = .75).

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective cohort, the subtherapeutic and therapeutic anticoagulation regimens produced equivalent outcomes in terms of adverse event rates, reintervention rates, and symptomatic improvement, suggesting that therapeutic doses of anticoagulation do not improve outcomes compared with subtherapeutic anticoagulation regimens following nonthrombotic venous stent placement.

摘要

目的

确定非血栓性下肢静脉疾病支架置入后,亚治疗抗凝方案是否不劣于治疗性抗凝方案。

材料和方法

回顾性分析 2002 年至 2016 年间接受非血栓性下肢静脉疾病支架置入术的 51 例连续患者(88%为女性;平均年龄 44 岁)。将患者分为 2 组:术后接受预防性依诺肝素或无抗凝治疗(亚治疗)组,以及术后接受依诺肝素、华法林和/或利伐沙班治疗性抗凝剂量(治疗)组。使用 Student t 检验、Fisher 确切检验和 χ 检验比较两组之间的基线人口统计学特征、手术特征和结局。亚治疗和治疗性抗凝组在基线人口统计学特征(如性别、种族和年龄)或手术特征(如放置支架数量、支架品牌、支架直径等)方面无显著差异。

结果

平均临床随访时间为 4.4 年(范围,0-16.3 年)。两组均无血栓性不良事件或因支架内再狭窄导致的管腔阻塞。治疗组有 5 例轻微出血不良事件,亚治疗组无出血不良事件(P=0.051)。主观症状改善方面无统计学差异(P=0.75)。

结论

在这项回顾性队列研究中,亚治疗和治疗性抗凝方案在不良事件发生率、再干预率和症状改善方面产生了等效的结果,这表明与非血栓性静脉支架置入后亚治疗抗凝方案相比,治疗剂量的抗凝并不能改善结局。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验