• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对于髂静脉支架置入术后髂-股静脉阻塞的常规随访监测可能没有必要。

Routine extended follow-up surveillance of iliac vein stents for iliocaval venous obstruction may not be warranted.

机构信息

Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala.

Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2017 Jul;5(4):500-505. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2017.01.018. Epub 2017 Apr 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvsv.2017.01.018
PMID:28623984
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes of iliac vein stents placed for iliocaval venous obstruction (ICVO) and to determine if routine follow-up surveillance is warranted on the basis of timing of stent failure.

METHODS

All patients who underwent iliac vein stenting from 2003 to 2015 were identified from a prospectively maintained registry. Demographics of the patients, venous risk factors, prior venous interventions, indications, imaging, anatomic location of the ICVO, operative findings, procedural success, complications, and clinical follow-up were recorded. Clinical and ultrasound surveillance was performed at first postoperative follow-up and at routine subsequent intervals. Continuous data were analyzed with Student t-tests or Mann-Whitney U test, and frequency data were analyzed with χ analysis or Fisher exact test. Primary patency was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.

RESULTS

Seventy-four limbs in 70 patients who underwent iliac vein stenting for ICVO were identified; 36 limbs (48.6%) were stented for nonthrombotic venous compression (stent-VC), and 38 limbs (51.4%) were stented for venous thrombosis (stent-VT). Twenty-seven limbs (71.1%) of the stent-VT group were treated for acute venous thrombosis requiring lysis followed by stenting for underlying venous lesions. The median number of follow-up visits for the stent-VC and stent-VT groups was two (interquartile range [IQR], 1-4) and two (IQR, 1-3), whereas the mean length of follow-up was 19.6 ± 29.5 months and 19.8 ± 26.5 months (P = .972), respectively. During the first 6 months, one limb (2.8% [n = 36]) in the stent-VC group occluded, whereas 13.2% (5/38) of the limbs in the stent-VT group occluded. In the stent-VT group, 57% of limbs (4 of 7) with acute venous thrombosis requiring thrombolytic therapy had limb occlusion at >6 months (median, 18.1 months; IQR, 16.6-30.1). Overall patency rates for the stent-VC and stent-VT groups were 97.2% (1/36) and 73.7% (10/38) at 36 months (standard error, ≤10%; P = .001), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Iliac vein stents placed for nonthrombotic iliac vein compression had statistically higher patency than those placed for venous thrombosis, with few stent failures, all occurring within 6 months. Iliac vein stents placed for venous thrombosis continued with stent failure after 6 months and may benefit from extended surveillance.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估因髂静脉阻塞(ICVO)而放置的髂静脉支架的治疗效果,并确定根据支架失效的时间是否需要进行常规随访监测。

方法

从一个前瞻性维护的登记处确定了 2003 年至 2015 年间接受髂静脉支架置入术的所有患者。记录患者的人口统计学资料、静脉危险因素、既往静脉介入治疗、适应证、影像学、ICVO 的解剖位置、手术发现、手术成功率、并发症和临床随访情况。术后首次随访和随后的常规随访进行临床和超声监测。连续数据采用学生 t 检验或曼-惠特尼 U 检验进行分析,频率数据采用卡方检验或 Fisher 确切概率法进行分析。采用 Kaplan-Meier 生存分析评估主要通畅率。

结果

共确定了 70 例因 ICVO 接受髂静脉支架置入术的 74 条肢体;36 条肢体(48.6%)因非血栓性静脉压迫(支架-VC)而置入支架,38 条肢体(51.4%)因静脉血栓形成(支架-VT)而置入支架。支架-VT 组中有 27 条肢体(71.1%)为急性静脉血栓形成,需要溶栓治疗,随后对潜在静脉病变进行支架置入。支架-VC 组和支架-VT 组的中位随访次数为 2 次(四分位距[IQR],1-4 次)和 2 次(IQR,1-3 次),平均随访时间分别为 19.6±29.5 个月和 19.8±26.5 个月(P=0.972)。在最初的 6 个月内,支架-VC 组中有 1 条肢体(2.8%[n=36])闭塞,而支架-VT 组中有 13.2%(5/38)的肢体闭塞。在支架-VT 组中,需要溶栓治疗的 7 条急性静脉血栓形成肢体中有 5 条(57%)在>6 个月时出现肢体闭塞(中位时间,18.1 个月;IQR,16.6-30.1)。支架-VC 组和支架-VT 组的总体通畅率分别为 97.2%(1/36)和 73.7%(10/38),36 个月时的标准误差均≤10%(P=0.001)。

结论

因非血栓性髂静脉压迫而放置的髂静脉支架通畅率明显高于因静脉血栓形成而放置的支架,支架失败率较低,所有支架失败均发生在 6 个月内。因静脉血栓形成而放置的支架在 6 个月后继续发生支架失败,可能需要延长监测。

相似文献

1
Routine extended follow-up surveillance of iliac vein stents for iliocaval venous obstruction may not be warranted.对于髂静脉支架置入术后髂-股静脉阻塞的常规随访监测可能没有必要。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2017 Jul;5(4):500-505. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2017.01.018. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
2
Outcomes and predictors of failure of iliac vein stenting after catheter-directed thrombolysis for acute iliofemoral thrombosis.经导管溶栓治疗急性髂股静脉血栓形成后髂静脉支架置入术失败的结果和预测因素。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2019 Mar;7(2):153-161. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2018.08.014. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
3
Contemporary outcomes of elective iliocaval and infrainguinal venous intervention for post-thrombotic chronic venous occlusive disease.择期髂股和腘下静脉干预治疗血栓后慢性静脉闭塞性疾病的当代结果。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2017 Nov;5(6):789-799. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2017.05.020.
4
Iliac Vein Stent Placement and the Iliocaval Confluence.髂静脉支架置入与髂腔静脉汇合处
Ann Vasc Surg. 2020 Feb;63:307-310. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.08.097. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
5
Bilateral stenting at the iliocaval confluence.髂股静脉汇合处双侧支架置入术。
J Vasc Surg. 2010 Jun;51(6):1457-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.01.056. Epub 2010 Apr 10.
6
Anticoagulation reduces iliocaval and iliofemoral stent thrombosis in patients with cancer stented for nonthrombotic venous obstruction.抗凝治疗可降低因非血栓性静脉阻塞而置入支架的癌症患者的髂股静脉和髂总静脉支架血栓形成风险。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2021 Jan;9(1):88-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2020.08.004. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
7
Placement of closed-cell designed venous stents in a mixed cohort of patients with chronic venous outflow obstructions - short-term safety, patency, and clinical outcomes.在慢性静脉流出道梗阻患者的混合队列中置入闭孔设计的静脉支架——短期安全性、通畅性及临床结局
Vasa. 2018 Oct;47(6):475-481. doi: 10.1024/0301-1526/a000731. Epub 2018 Sep 3.
8
Characteristics and outcomes of stent occlusion after iliocaval stenting.髂静脉支架置入术后支架闭塞的特点和结局。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2019 Jan;7(1):56-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2018.07.013. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
9
Stent patency in patients with advanced chronic venous disease and nonthrombotic iliac vein lesions.伴有非血栓性髂静脉病变的晚期慢性静脉疾病患者的支架通畅率。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2018 Jul;6(4):457-463. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2018.02.004.
10
Early thrombosis after iliac stenting for venous outflow occlusion is related to disease severity and type of anticoagulation.髂静脉支架置入术后早期血栓形成与疾病严重程度和抗凝类型有关。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2021 Nov;9(6):1399-1407.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2021.02.012. Epub 2021 Mar 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Early Thrombus Removal for Acute Lower Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis: Update on Inclusion, Technical Aspects, and Postprocedural Management.急性下肢深静脉血栓形成的早期血栓清除术:纳入标准、技术要点及术后管理的最新进展
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2024 Dec;47(12):1595-1604. doi: 10.1007/s00270-024-03898-4. Epub 2024 Nov 14.
2
Total Iliocaval Reconstruction in a Complex Palliative Patient with Malignant Inferior Vena Cava Syndrome.复杂姑息性恶性下腔静脉综合征患者的全髂股静脉重建。
Curr Oncol. 2024 Jul 9;31(7):3978-3984. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31070294.
3
Principles of Optimal Antithrombotic Therapy for Iliac VEnous Stenting (POATIVES): A national expert-based Delphi consensus study.
髂静脉支架置入术的最佳抗栓治疗原则(POATIVES):基于全国专家的德尔菲共识研究。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2024 Mar;12(2):101739. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2023.101739. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
4
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 12-Month Patency After Intervention for Iliofemoral Obstruction Using Dedicated or Non-Dedicated Venous Stents.髂股动脉阻塞介入治疗后 12 个月通畅率的系统评价和荟萃分析:专用或非专用静脉支架的应用
J Endovasc Ther. 2022 Jun;29(3):478-492. doi: 10.1177/15266028211057085. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
5
Doppler ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in detection of stent stenosis after iliac vein stenting.经髂静脉支架置入术后支架狭窄的多普勒超声及超声造影检测。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021 Jan 20;21(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01840-3.
6
[Antithrombotic therapy after iliac vein stenting].髂静脉支架置入术后的抗栓治疗
Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2020 May 25;49(1):131-136. doi: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-9292.2020.02.15.