• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较两种不同技术修复小儿前鼓膜穿孔。

Comparing two different techniques to repair pediatric anterior tympanic membrane perforations.

机构信息

Division of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Utah, USA.

Division of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Virginia, USA.

出版信息

Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Nov;150:110903. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2021.110903. Epub 2021 Aug 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijporl.2021.110903
PMID:34479059
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Compare outcomes between a microscopic and endoscopic technique for anterior tympanic membrane (TM) perforation.

METHODS

Results of microscopic overlay (MT) and endoscopic tympanoplasty (ET) for management of anterior TM perforations from a single surgeon.

RESULTS

There were 28 patients in the MT group and 35 in the ET group. The mean age was 7.1 years and 10.9 years (p < 0.001) MT and ET groups respectively. There was no statistical differences in perforation location (p = 0.1), etiology (p = 0.52) or size (p = 0.1) between both groups. Mean operating time was 119.0 min and 131.0 min in the MT and ET groups respectively (p = 0.23). Follow up was 30.9 months and 9.0 months (p = 0.001) MT and ET respectively. The perforation was successfully closed in 29 patients at 6 weeks in the ET (82.9%) and 25 in the MT (89.3%), p = 0.47. Adjusting for age revealed no significant difference between groups. Long term follow up, resulted in 10 failures (28.6%) and 7 patients (25.0%) in the ET and MT groups respectively, p = 0.75. Adjusting for the follow-up period or age, there was no significant difference between groups. The change in ABG and PTA measures were not statistically different between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

An anteriorly based ET is a novel technique for management of anterior TM perforations. Results from this pilot study indicate that this ET approach may be an appropriate alternative to MT for difficult to repair anterior perforations. A longer follow-up will be necessary to determine its role in these perforations.

摘要

目的

比较显微镜下和内镜下技术治疗前鼓膜(TM)穿孔的结果。

方法

一位外科医生对显微镜下覆盖(MT)和内镜下鼓室成形术(ET)治疗前 TM 穿孔的结果进行分析。

结果

MT 组 28 例,ET 组 35 例。MT 组和 ET 组的平均年龄分别为 7.1 岁和 10.9 岁(p<0.001)。两组穿孔位置(p=0.1)、病因(p=0.52)或大小(p=0.1)无统计学差异。MT 和 ET 组的平均手术时间分别为 119.0 分钟和 131.0 分钟(p=0.23)。MT 和 ET 组的随访时间分别为 30.9 个月和 9.0 个月(p=0.001)。ET 组 6 周时 29 例(82.9%)和 MT 组 25 例(89.3%)成功封闭穿孔,p=0.47。调整年龄后,两组无显著差异。长期随访结果显示,ET 组有 10 例(28.6%)和 MT 组有 7 例(25.0%)失败,p=0.75。调整随访时间或年龄后,两组无显著差异。两组的 ABG 和 PTA 测量值变化无统计学差异。

结论

基于前的 ET 是治疗前 TM 穿孔的一种新方法。本初步研究结果表明,对于难以修复的前穿孔,这种 ET 方法可能是 MT 的一种合适替代方法。需要更长的随访时间来确定其在前部穿孔中的作用。

相似文献

1
Comparing two different techniques to repair pediatric anterior tympanic membrane perforations.比较两种不同技术修复小儿前鼓膜穿孔。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Nov;150:110903. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2021.110903. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
2
Comparative study of endoscopic and microscopic tympanoplasty performed by a single experienced surgeon.单一经验丰富的外科医生行内镜与显微镜下鼓膜成形术的对比研究。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2021 Jan-Feb;42(1):102788. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102788. Epub 2020 Oct 23.
3
Endoscopic triple-C tympanoplasty: an alternative approach to anteriorly located tympanic membrane repair.内镜下三联C型鼓室成形术:一种修复前位鼓膜的替代方法。
J Laryngol Otol. 2018 Nov;132(11):1007-1009. doi: 10.1017/S0022215118001937. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
4
Endoscopic transcanal versus conventional microscopic tympanoplasty in treatment of anterior tympanic membrane perforations.经耳内镜与传统显微镜下鼓膜修补术治疗鼓膜前穿孔的比较。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Dec;276(12):3327-3333. doi: 10.1007/s00405-019-05646-8. Epub 2019 Sep 18.
5
Comparison of Medial Underlay and Lateral Underlay Endoscopic Type I Tympanoplasty for Anterior Perforations of the Tympanic Membrane.内镜下鼓膜前穿孔中采用中置法和外置法行Ⅰ型鼓室成形术的对比。
Otol Neurotol. 2021 Sep 1;42(8):1177-1183. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003138.
6
Efficacy of "hammock" tympanoplasty in the treatment of anterior perforations.“吊床式”鼓室成形术治疗前穿孔的疗效。
Laryngoscope. 2013 May;123(5):1236-40. doi: 10.1002/lary.23747. Epub 2013 Apr 2.
7
Endoscopic type 1 tympanoplasty in pediatric patients using tragal cartilage.耳内镜下使用耳屏软骨的 1 型鼓室成形术治疗小儿患者。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Jun;141(6):532-8. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2015.0601.
8
Medial or medio-lateral graft tympanoplasty for repair of tympanic membrane perforation.采用内侧或中-外侧移植鼓室成形术修复鼓膜穿孔。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2009 Jul;73(7):941-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2009.03.011. Epub 2009 Apr 28.
9
Transcanal Endoscopic Versus Microscopic Tympanoplasty: Is There a Difference in Perforation Closure Rates?经耳道内镜与显微镜下鼓膜成形术:穿孔闭合率有差异吗?
Otol Neurotol Open. 2022 Aug 5;2(3):e016. doi: 10.1097/ONO.0000000000000016. eCollection 2022 Sep.
10
Endoscopic versus microscopic approach to type 1 tympanoplasty in children.儿童1型鼓室成形术的内镜与显微镜手术方法对比
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Jul;78(7):1084-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2014.04.013. Epub 2014 Apr 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Endoscopic or Microscopic Tympanoplasty Advantages and Disadvantages: A Theory Domain Systematic Review.内镜或显微镜下鼓室成形术的优缺点:理论领域的系统评价
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Jul 13;27(3):e528-e535. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1748808. eCollection 2023 Jul.