Suppr超能文献

基于肌酐的方程在估算老年中国患者肾小球滤过率中的适用性。

Applicability of Creatinine-based equations for estimating glomerular filtration rate in elderly Chinese patients.

机构信息

Department of Nephrology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangdong Provincial Geriatrics Institute, Guangzhou, 510080, China.

The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, China.

出版信息

BMC Geriatr. 2021 Sep 4;21(1):481. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02428-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The accuracy of the estimated glomerular filter rate (eGFR) in elderly patients is debatable. In 2020, a new creatinine-based equation by European Kidney Function Consortium (EKFC) was applied to all age groups. The objective of this study was to assess the appropriateness of the new EKFC equation with Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI), Lund-Malmö Revised (LMR), Berlin Initiative Study 1 (BIS1), and full age spectrum (FAS) equations based on serum creatinine (SCR) for elderly Chinese patients.

METHODS

A total of 612 elderly patients with a measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR) by the dual plasma sample clearance method with Technetium-99 m-diethylenetriamine-pentaacetic acid (Tc-99 m-DTPA) were divided into four subgroups based on age, sex, mGFR, and whether combined with diabetes. The performance of GFR was assessed while considering bias, precision, accuracy, and root-mean-square error (RMSE). Bland-Altman plots, concordance correlation coefficients (CCCs), and correlation coefficients were applied to evaluate the validity of eGFR.

RESULTS

The median age of the 612 participants was 73 years, and 386 (63.1%) were male. Referring to mGFR (42.1 ml/min/1.73 m), the CKD-EPI, LMR, BIS1, FAS, and EKFC equations estimated GFR at 44.4, 41.1, 43.6, 41.8 and 41.9 ml/min/1.73 m, respectively. Overall, the smallest bias was found for the BIS1 equation (- 0.050 vs. range - 3.015 to 0.795, P<0.05, vs. the CKD-EPI equation). Regarding P30, interquartile range (IQR), RMSE, and GFR category misclassification, the BIS1 equation generally performed more accurately than the other eqs. (73.9%, 12.7, 12.9, and 35.3%, respectively). Nevertheless, no equation achieved optimal performance for the mGFR≥60 ml/min/1.73 m subgroup. Bland-Altman analysis showed the smallest mean difference (- 0.3 ml/min/1.73 m) for the BIS1 equation when compared to the other equations.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggested that the BIS1 equation was the most applicable for estimating GFR in Chinese elderly patients with moderate to severe renal impairment.

摘要

背景

估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR)在老年患者中的准确性存在争议。2020 年,欧洲肾脏功能联盟(EKFC)推出了一种新的基于肌酐的方程,适用于所有年龄段。本研究旨在评估新的 EKFC 方程与慢性肾脏病流行病学合作组(CKD-EPI)、伦德-马尔默修订版(LMR)、柏林倡议研究 1(BIS1)和基于血清肌酐(SCR)的全年龄谱(FAS)方程在老年中国患者中的适用性。

方法

共纳入 612 例经双血浆样本清除法测定的肾小球滤过率(mGFR)的老年患者,根据年龄、性别、mGFR 和是否合并糖尿病分为 4 个亚组。在考虑偏倚、精度、准确性和均方根误差(RMSE)的情况下,评估 GFR 的性能。采用 Bland-Altman 图、一致性相关系数(CCC)和相关系数评估 eGFR 的有效性。

结果

612 名参与者的中位年龄为 73 岁,386 名(63.1%)为男性。根据 mGFR(42.1ml/min/1.73m),CKD-EPI、LMR、BIS1、FAS 和 EKFC 方程分别估计 GFR 为 44.4、41.1、43.6、41.8 和 41.9ml/min/1.73m。总体而言,BIS1 方程的偏倚最小(-0.050,范围为-3.015 至 0.795,P<0.05,与 CKD-EPI 方程相比)。关于 P30、四分位间距(IQR)、RMSE 和 GFR 分类错误,BIS1 方程通常比其他方程更准确(分别为 73.9%、12.7%、12.9%和 35.3%)。然而,没有任何一种方程在 mGFR≥60ml/min/1.73m 亚组中表现出最佳性能。Bland-Altman 分析显示,BIS1 方程与其他方程相比,平均差异最小(-0.3ml/min/1.73m)。

结论

本研究表明,BIS1 方程最适用于估计中国中重度肾功能损害老年患者的 GFR。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/952d/8418712/9b2d4794f712/12877_2021_2428_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验