Suppr超能文献

膀胱充盈与标准导尿管拔除用于门诊腹腔镜妇科手术后尿意试验的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Bladder Backfilling versus Standard Catheter Removal for Trial of Void after Outpatient Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Ambulatory Surgery Department (Dr. Tan and Ms. Dong), West China Second Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu.

Gynecology and Obstetrics Department, Mianyang Central Hospital (Mr. Pan and Mr. Wang), Mianyang, China.

出版信息

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2022 Feb;29(2):196-203.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2021.08.027. Epub 2021 Sep 3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the rate of postoperative urinary retention and time to discharge between bladder backfilling and standard catheter removal for trial of void (TOV) after outpatient laparoscopic gynecologic surgery. Our secondary objectives were to compare the time to void, postoperative complications, and patient satisfaction.

DATA SOURCES

We searched the PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library databases, and relevant reference lists of eligible articles up to March of 2021.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

This review included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of TOV after outpatient laparoscopic gynecologic surgery. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence interval (CI) and weighted mean differences (WMDs) were reported. The quality of the studies was assessed according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Data were analyzed with Review Manager 5.4 software (RevMan 5.4.1; Cochrane Collaboration, London, United Kingdom).

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Five RCTs (N = 488) were included. The bladder backfilling group had a significantly shorter time to void than the standard TOV group (WMD, -25.19 minutes; 95% CI, -44.60 to -5.77; p = .01). Successful TOV was not significantly different between the 2 (OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.51 to -1.65; p = .77), without significant heterogeneity (I = 24%). There was also no significant difference in the time to discharge between the 2 TOV techniques (WMD, -25.19 minutes; 95% CI, -44.60 to -5.77; p = .01). There was no significant difference in complication rates or patient satisfaction between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

The bladder backfilling technique of TOV after outpatient laparoscopic gynecologic surgery may reduce the time to first spontaneous void without affecting patient satisfaction or postoperative complications, but it does not significantly affect the time to discharge or urinary retention.

摘要

目的

比较膀胱充盈和标准导尿管拔除后用于门诊腹腔镜妇科手术后导尿试验(TOV)的术后尿潴留率和出院时间。我们的次要目标是比较首次排尿时间、术后并发症和患者满意度。

资料来源

我们检索了 PubMed、Ovid MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆数据库以及截至 2021 年 3 月的合格文章的相关参考文献列表。

研究选择方法

本综述纳入了门诊腹腔镜妇科手术后 TOV 的随机对照试验(RCT)。报告了优势比(OR)及其 95%置信区间(CI)和加权均数差(WMD)。根据 Cochrane 干预系统评价手册评估研究质量。使用 Review Manager 5.4 软件(RevMan 5.4.1;Cochrane 协作网,英国伦敦)进行数据分析。

列表、综合和结果:纳入了 5 项 RCT(N=488)。与标准 TOV 组相比,膀胱充盈组首次自主排尿时间显著缩短(WMD,-25.19 分钟;95%CI,-44.60 至-5.77;p=0.01)。2 组间成功的 TOV 无显著差异(OR,0.92;95%CI,0.51 至-1.65;p=0.77),且无显著异质性(I=24%)。2 种 TOV 技术之间的出院时间也无显著差异(WMD,-25.19 分钟;95%CI,-44.60 至-5.77;p=0.01)。2 组间的并发症发生率或患者满意度无显著差异。

结论

门诊腹腔镜妇科手术后 TOV 的膀胱充盈技术可能会缩短首次自主排尿时间,而不会影响患者满意度或术后并发症,但不会显著影响出院时间或尿潴留。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验