Suppr超能文献

诱饵效应对消费者肉类产品购买行为的影响:猪肉与鸡肉的比较

Decoy Effect on Consumers' Purchase Behaviors in Relation to Meat Products: Comparison of Pork and Chicken.

作者信息

Xu Lingling, Yu Meidan, Chen Xiujuan

机构信息

Institute for Food Safety Risk Management, School of Business, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, China.

School of Business, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 13;12:679256. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.679256. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Few studies have analyzed the behaviors of consumers in relation to their purchase of meat products produced with animal welfare in consideration under different decoy scenarios; thus, it is difficult to accurately understand consumer behaviors and to reduce the bias in the conclusions of this study regarding consumption preferences in relation to meat products that had been produced with animal welfare in consideration. With the frequent occurrence of cases connected with the quality and safety of meat in China, the welfare conditions of livestock and poultry urgently need to be improved. We used 810 consumers in Wuxi City, Jiangsu Province, China as our study sample, chose pigs and chickens, i.e., the two common species of livestock and poultry, as study cases, and set four types of decoy scenarios based on breeding time, breeding model, diet cleanliness label, and price attributes, to explore the purchasing options of consumers for meat produced with high levels of animal welfare, under different decoy conditions. A decoy effect was observed in a bounded rational consumption situation in relation to the purchasing behaviors of both chicken and pork. In a situation of chicken purchase, the decoy effect of the breeding model was the strongest, followed by that of price, diet cleanliness label, and breeding time. In the case of pork purchase, the decoy effect of the diet cleanliness label was the strongest, followed by price, breeding model, and breeding time. In a comprehensive comparison between the two types of consumption experiments, price decoy constantly played a significant role, while the decoy effect of breeding time was the weakest. Accordingly, we proposed that in addition to strengthening the knowledge of people in the welfare of livestock and poultry, designing a breeding model decoy or price decoy in the process of chicken sales and designing a diet cleanliness label decoy or price decoy in the process of pork sales can guide the demand of consumers for meat produced with high levels of animal welfare. The welfare of livestock and poultry should thus be improved.

摘要

很少有研究分析消费者在不同诱饵情境下购买考虑动物福利生产的肉类产品时的行为;因此,难以准确理解消费者行为,也难以减少本研究中关于考虑动物福利生产的肉类产品消费偏好结论中的偏差。随着中国与肉类质量安全相关的案例频繁发生,畜禽的福利状况亟待改善。我们以中国江苏省无锡市的810名消费者为研究样本,选择猪和鸡这两种常见的畜禽品种作为研究案例,并基于养殖时间、养殖模式、饮食清洁标签和价格属性设置了四种诱饵情境,以探究消费者在不同诱饵条件下对高动物福利水平生产的肉类的购买选择。在有界理性消费情境下,观察到鸡肉和猪肉购买行为中均存在诱饵效应。在购买鸡肉的情境中,养殖模式的诱饵效应最强,其次是价格、饮食清洁标签和养殖时间。在购买猪肉的情况下,饮食清洁标签的诱饵效应最强,其次是价格、养殖模式和养殖时间。在两种消费实验的综合比较中,价格诱饵始终发挥着显著作用,而养殖时间的诱饵效应最弱。因此,我们建议,除了加强人们对畜禽福利的认识外,在鸡肉销售过程中设计养殖模式诱饵或价格诱饵,在猪肉销售过程中设计饮食清洁标签诱饵或价格诱饵,可以引导消费者对高动物福利水平生产的肉类的需求。畜禽福利应因此得到改善。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29e5/8414641/a6ecb15bf815/fpsyg-12-679256-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验