Rahman Md Motiur, Howard George, Qian Jingjing, Garza Kimberly, Abebe Ash, Hansen Richard
Department of Health Outcomes Research and Policy (MMR, JQ, KG, RH), Harrison School of Pharmacy, Auburn University, AL; Department of Biostatistics (GH), Ryals School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham; and Department of Mathematics and Statistics (AA), Auburn University, AL.
Neurol Clin Pract. 2021 Jun;11(3):e277-e286. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000952.
We aim to evaluate the association between anticholinergic drug (ACH) use and cognitive impairment and the effect of disparity parameters (sex, race, income, education, and rural or urban areas) on this relationship.
The analyses included 13,623 adults aged ≥65 years from the REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke study (recruited 2003-2007). The ACH use was defined by the 2015 Beers Criteria, and cognitive impairment was measured by the Six-Item Cognitive Screener. Multivariable logistic regression models assessed disparities in cognitive impairment with ACH use, iteratively adjusting for disparity parameters and other covariates. The full models included interaction terms between ACH use and other covariates. A similar approach was used for class-specific ACH exposure and cognitive impairment analyses.
Approximately 14% of the participants used at least 1 ACH listed in the Beers Criteria. Antidepressants were the most frequently prescribed ACH class. A significant sex-race interaction illustrated that females compared with males (in Blacks: odds ratio [OR] = 1.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10-1.49 and in Whites: OR = 1.96, 95% CI 1.74-2.20), especially White females (Black vs White: OR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.64-0.80), were more likely to receive ACHs. Higher odds of cognitive impairment were observed among ACH users compared with the nonusers (OR = 1.26, 95% CI 1.01-1.58). In our class-level analyses, only antidepressant users (OR = 1.60, 95% CI 1.14-2.25) showed a significant association with cognitive impairment in the fully adjusted model.
We observed demographic and socioeconomic differences in ACH use and in cognitive impairment, individually.
我们旨在评估使用抗胆碱能药物(ACH)与认知障碍之间的关联,以及差异参数(性别、种族、收入、教育程度和城乡地区)对这种关系的影响。
分析纳入了来自“中风地理和种族差异原因”研究(2003 - 2007年招募)的13623名年龄≥65岁的成年人。ACH的使用依据2015年《啤酒准则》定义,认知障碍通过六项认知筛查量表进行测量。多变量逻辑回归模型评估了使用ACH与认知障碍之间的差异,并对差异参数和其他协变量进行迭代调整。完整模型包括ACH使用与其他协变量之间的交互项。对于特定类别ACH暴露与认知障碍分析采用了类似方法。
约14%的参与者使用了至少一种《啤酒准则》中列出的ACH。抗抑郁药是最常开具的ACH类别。显著的性别 - 种族交互作用表明,女性相较于男性(黑人中:比值比[OR]=1.28,95%置信区间[CI]1.10 - 1.49;白人中:OR = 1.96,95% CI 1.74 - 2.20),尤其是白人女性(黑人与白人相比:OR = 0.71,95% CI 0.64 - 0.80),更有可能使用ACH。与未使用者相比,ACH使用者中观察到认知障碍的几率更高(OR = 1.26,95% CI 1.01 - 1.58)。在我们的类别水平分析中,在完全调整模型中,只有抗抑郁药使用者(OR = 1.60,95% CI 1.14 - 2.25)与认知障碍存在显著关联。
我们分别观察到了ACH使用和认知障碍方面的人口统计学和社会经济差异。