From the Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham.
Stroke. 2013 Nov;44(11):3254-9. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.002113. Epub 2013 Sep 12.
Racial and geographic disparities in stroke mortality have been documented for over 50 years, and for those aged 45 to 64 are among the largest for any disease. The causes of the disparities have been mysterious; however, investments by NINDS, NHLBI and CDC are now providing insights into the causes.
Complementary study designs provide information on different aspects of the disparities. Vital statistics data track temporal patterns in stroke mortality, an objective index of the success in overcoming the disparities. Surveillance studies assess of the contributions of incidence versus case fatality to the disparities, a distinction critical to guide efforts to reduce the disparities. Finally, cohort studies give insights to the contribution of specific risk factors to disparities in either incidence or case fatality, allowing targeted interventions.
While deaths from stroke mortality declined by a third in the most recent eleven years, there has been a 35% increase in the black-white disparity and little change in geographic disparities. Surveillance studies suggest that the black-white disparity is primarily attributable to differences in incidence, and also have potentially unmasked Hispanic-white differences in incidence that are not apparent in mortality trends. Longitudinal cohort studies are suggesting multiple targets for intervention such as a multi-dimensional impact of blood pressure on the black-white differences.
After suffering these disparities over a half-century, information is now emerging to allow us to better understand the underpinnings of the disparities and potentially enter a new era of targeted interventions to reduce these disparities.
种族和地理差异导致的中风死亡率已经存在超过 50 年,在所有疾病中,45 至 64 岁年龄组的差异最大。这些差异的原因一直是个谜;然而,NINDS、NHLBI 和 CDC 的投资现在为这些差异的原因提供了一些见解。
互补的研究设计提供了关于差异不同方面的信息。人口统计数据跟踪中风死亡率的时间模式,这是克服差异的成功的客观指标。监测研究评估发病率与病死率对差异的贡献,这一区别对于指导减少差异的努力至关重要。最后,队列研究深入了解特定风险因素对发病率或病死率差异的贡献,从而可以进行有针对性的干预。
尽管在最近的十一年中,中风死亡率下降了三分之一,但黑人和白人之间的差异增加了 35%,而地理差异几乎没有变化。监测研究表明,黑人和白人之间的差异主要归因于发病率的差异,并且还可能揭示了发病率趋势中不明显的西班牙裔与白人之间的差异。纵向队列研究表明,存在多种干预目标,例如血压对黑人和白人差异的多维影响。
在经历了半个多世纪的这些差异之后,现在出现了一些信息,可以让我们更好地了解这些差异的基础,并有可能进入一个新的有针对性干预的时代,以减少这些差异。