Suppr超能文献

滑膜液离心后α-防御素侧向流动试验在人工膝关节周围感染诊断中的性能

Performance of alpha-defensin lateral flow test after synovial fluid centrifugation for diagnosis of periprosthetic knee infection.

作者信息

Abdo Rodrigo Calil Teles, Gobbi Riccardo Gomes, Leite Chilan Bou Ghosson, Pasoto Sandra Gofinet, Leon Elaine Pires, Lima Ana Lucia Lei Munhoz, Bonfa Eloisa, Pécora José Ricardo, Demange Marco Kawamura

机构信息

Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Sao Paulo 05403-010, Brazil.

Division of Rheumatology, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Sao Paulo 01246-903, Brazil.

出版信息

World J Orthop. 2021 Aug 18;12(8):565-574. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v12.i8.565.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The quantitative alpha-defensin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) demands a prior synovial fluid centrifugation, whereas this processing is not routinely required prior to the alpha-defensin lateral flow test.

AIM

To evaluate whether a prior synovial fluid centrifugation could lead the lateral flow performance to achieve comparable results to ELISA during periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) diagnosis.

METHODS

Fifty-three cases were included in this study: 22 classified as PJI and 31 classified as aseptic cases, according to Musculoskeletal Infection Society 2013 criteria. Synovial fluid samples were submitted to centrifugation, and the supernatant was evaluated by ELISA and lateral flow tests. The sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP) and accuracy of each method were calculated as well as the agreement between those two methods.

RESULTS

In all of the 31 samples from aseptic patients, alpha-defensin ELISA and lateral flow tests showed negative results for infection. Regarding the 22 infected patients, the lateral flow test was positive in 19 cases (86.4%) and the ELISA was positive in 21 (95.5%). Sensibility, SP and accuracy were, respectively, 86.4% (95%CI: 65.1%-97.1%), 100% (95%CI: 88.8%-100%) and 93.2% (95%CI: 82.8%-98.3%) for the lateral flow test and 95.5% (95%CI: 77.2%-99.9%), 100% (95%CI: 88.8%-100%) and 98.1% (95%CI: 89.9%-100%) for ELISA. An agreement of 96.2% between those methods were observed. No statistical difference was found between them ( = 0.48).

CONCLUSION

Alpha-defensin lateral flow test showed high SE, SP and accuracy after a prior synovial fluid centrifugation, achieving comparable results to ELISA. Considering the lower complexity of the lateral flow and its equivalent performance obtained in this condition, a prior centrifugation might be added as a valuable step to enhance the PJI diagnosis.

摘要

背景

定量α-防御素酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)需要事先对滑液进行离心处理,而在进行α-防御素侧向流动试验之前通常不需要进行这种处理。

目的

评估在人工关节周围感染(PJI)诊断期间,事先对滑液进行离心处理是否能使侧向流动试验的性能达到与ELISA相当的结果。

方法

本研究纳入53例病例:根据肌肉骨骼感染协会2013年标准,其中22例被分类为PJI,31例被分类为无菌病例。将滑液样本进行离心处理,然后通过ELISA和侧向流动试验对上清液进行评估。计算每种方法的灵敏度(SE)、特异性(SP)和准确性,以及这两种方法之间的一致性。

结果

在31例无菌患者的所有样本中,α-防御素ELISA和侧向流动试验均显示感染结果为阴性。对于22例感染患者,侧向流动试验有19例呈阳性(86.4%),ELISA有21例呈阳性(95.5%)。侧向流动试验的灵敏度、SP和准确性分别为86.4%(95%CI:65.1%-97.1%)、100%(95%CI:88.8%-100%)和93.2%(95%CI:82.8%-98.3%),ELISA的灵敏度、SP和准确性分别为95.5%(95%CI:77.2%-99.9%)、100%(95%CI:88.8%-100%)和98.1%(95%CI:89.9%-100%)。观察到这两种方法之间的一致性为96.2%。两者之间未发现统计学差异(P = 0.48)。

结论

经过事先对滑液进行离心处理后,α-防御素侧向流动试验显示出高灵敏度、高特异性和高准确性,达到了与ELISA相当的结果。考虑到侧向流动试验的复杂性较低且在此条件下获得了相当的性能,事先进行离心处理可能是增强PJI诊断的一个有价值的步骤。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f201/8384616/93c99cac14a9/WJO-12-565-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验