Suppr超能文献

关节液α-防御素在假体周围关节感染诊断中的应用:侧向流检测是一种有效的术中检测方法。

Synovial fluid α-defensin in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection: the lateral flow test is an effective intraoperative detection method.

机构信息

Shanghai Key Laboratory of Orthopaedic Implants, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 639 Zhizaoju Road, Shanghai, China.

Department of Bone and Joint Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 145 Middle Shandong Road, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 Aug 28;14(1):274. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1320-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Synovial fluid α-defensin is a valuable biomarker for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Its diagnostic value for PJI has been widely evaluated recently, but results are inconsistent, especially for different test methods. The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of laboratory-based immunoassay and lateral flow testing for the detection of α-defensin against hip and knee PJI.

METHODS

We systematically searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for articles on the diagnostic accuracy of α-defensin for PJI published up to September 2018. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve (AUC), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were calculated for the evaluation of the diagnostic value of α-defensin for PJI.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies were included. Eleven evaluated laboratory-based immunoassay, and 10 evaluated the lateral flow test results. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, AUC, PLR, NLR, and DOR of laboratory-based immunoassays were 0.96 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.90-0.98), 0.97 (95% CI 0.95-0.99), 0.99 (95% CI 0.98-1.00), 35.0 (95% CI 18.5-66.2), 0.04 (95% CI 0.02-0.11), and 811 (95% CI 220-2990), respectively. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, AUC, PLR, NLR, and DOR of the lateral flow test were 0.86 (95% CI 0.81-0.91), 0.96 (95% CI 0.93-0.98), 0.95 (95% CI 0.93-0.97), 21.2 (95% CI 11.7-38.5), 0.14 (95% CI 0.10-0.21), and 148 (95% CI 64-343), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Laboratory-based immunoassay of α-defensin is highly accurate for the diagnosis of hip and knee PJI. The lateral flow test is less sensitive but still a useful intraoperative detection tool for PJI.

摘要

背景

滑液α-防御素是一种有价值的假体周围关节感染(PJI)的生物标志物。最近,人们广泛评估了其对 PJI 的诊断价值,但结果不一致,尤其是对于不同的检测方法。本研究的目的是评估实验室基于免疫测定和侧向流动检测对髋膝关节 PJI 检测α-防御素的诊断价值。

方法

我们系统地检索了截至 2018 年 9 月发表的有关α-防御素用于 PJI 的诊断准确性的 MEDLINE 和 EMBASE 文章。为评估α-防御素对 PJI 的诊断价值,计算了汇总的敏感性、特异性、曲线下面积(AUC)、阳性似然比(PLR)、阴性似然比(NLR)和诊断比值比(DOR)。

结果

纳入了 19 项研究。其中 11 项评估了实验室基于免疫测定,10 项评估了侧向流动试验结果。实验室基于免疫测定的汇总敏感性、特异性、AUC、PLR、NLR 和 DOR 分别为 0.96(95%置信区间[CI]0.90-0.98)、0.97(95%CI0.95-0.99)、0.99(95%CI0.98-1.00)、35.0(95%CI18.5-66.2)、0.04(95%CI0.02-0.11)和 811(95%CI220-2990)。侧向流动试验的汇总敏感性、特异性、AUC、PLR、NLR 和 DOR 分别为 0.86(95%CI0.81-0.91)、0.96(95%CI0.93-0.98)、0.95(95%CI0.93-0.97)、21.2(95%CI11.7-38.5)、0.14(95%CI0.10-0.21)和 148(95%CI64-343)。

结论

实验室基于免疫测定的α-防御素对髋膝关节 PJI 的诊断非常准确。侧向流动试验的敏感性较低,但仍是一种有用的术中 PJI 检测工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e288/6712677/997d5ab7b561/13018_2019_1320_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验