• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个人防护装备对新生儿复苏程序的影响:一项随机、交叉、模拟研究。

Impact of personal protective equipment on neonatal resuscitation procedures: a randomised, cross-over, simulation study.

机构信息

Independent Statistician, Solagna, Italy.

Department of Neonatology, Bolzano Hospital, Bolzano, Italy.

出版信息

Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2022 Mar;107(2):211-215. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2021-322216. Epub 2021 Sep 6.

DOI:10.1136/archdischild-2021-322216
PMID:34489350
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Healthcare providers should use personal protective equipment (PPE) when performing aerosol-generating medical procedures during highly infectious respiratory pandemics. We aimed to compare the timing of neonatal resuscitation procedures in a manikin model with or without PPE for prevention of SARS-COVID-19 transmission.

METHODS

A randomised controlled cross-over (AB/BA) trial of resuscitation with or without PPE in a neonatal resuscitation scenario. Forty-eight participants were divided in 12 consultant-nurse teams and 12 resident-nurse teams. The primary outcome measure was the time of positive pressure ventilation (PPV) initiation. The secondary outcome measures were duration of tracheal intubation procedure, time of initiation of chest compressions, correct use of PPE and discomfort/limitations using PPE.

RESULTS

There were significant differences in timing of PPV initiation (consultant-nurse teams: mean difference (MD) 6.0 s, 95% CI 1.1 to 10.9 s; resident-nurse teams: MD 11.0 s, 95% CI 1.9 to 20.0 s), duration of tracheal intubation (consultant-nurse teams: MD 22.0 s, 95% CI 7.0 to 36.9 s; resident-nurse teams: MD 9.1 s, 95% CI 0.1 to 18.1 s) and chest compressions (consultant-nurse teams: MD 32.3 s, 95% CI 14.4 to 50.1 s; resident-nurse teams: MD 9.1 s, 95% CI 0.1 to 18.1 s). Twelve participants completed the dressing after entering the delivery room. PPE was associated with visual limitations (43/48 participants), discomfort in movements (42/48), limitations in communication (32/48) and thermal discomfort (29/48).

CONCLUSIONS

In a manikin model, using PPE delayed neonatal resuscitation procedures with potential clinical impact. Healthcare workers reported limitations and discomfort when wearing PPE.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04666233.

摘要

背景与目的

在高度传染性呼吸道大流行期间,医疗保健提供者在进行产生气溶胶的医疗操作时应使用个人防护设备(PPE)。我们旨在比较在预防 SARS-COVID-19 传播的情况下,在模型中使用或不使用 PPE 进行新生儿复苏程序的时间。

方法

一项在新生儿复苏场景中使用或不使用 PPE 的随机对照交叉(AB/BA)试验。48 名参与者分为 12 名顾问-护士团队和 12 名居民-护士团队。主要结局测量指标为正压通气(PPV)开始时间。次要结局指标为气管插管程序持续时间、胸外按压开始时间、PPE 的正确使用以及使用 PPE 时的不适/限制。

结果

PPV 开始时间存在显著差异(顾问-护士团队:平均差异(MD)6.0s,95%CI 1.1 至 10.9 s;居民-护士团队:MD 11.0s,95%CI 1.9 至 20.0 s),气管插管持续时间(顾问-护士团队:MD 22.0s,95%CI 7.0 至 36.9 s;居民-护士团队:MD 9.1s,95%CI 0.1 至 18.1 s)和胸外按压(顾问-护士团队:MD 32.3s,95%CI 14.4 至 50.1 s;居民-护士团队:MD 9.1s,95%CI 0.1 至 18.1 s)。12 名参与者在进入产房后完成了着装。PPE 与视觉限制(48 名参与者中的 43 名)、运动不适(48 名参与者中的 42 名)、沟通限制(48 名参与者中的 32 名)和热不适(48 名参与者中的 29 名)有关。

结论

在模型中,使用 PPE 会延迟新生儿复苏程序,可能具有临床影响。医护人员在佩戴 PPE 时报告了限制和不适。

试验注册号

NCT04666233。

相似文献

1
Impact of personal protective equipment on neonatal resuscitation procedures: a randomised, cross-over, simulation study.个人防护装备对新生儿复苏程序的影响:一项随机、交叉、模拟研究。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2022 Mar;107(2):211-215. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2021-322216. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
2
Sustained versus standard inflations during neonatal resuscitation to prevent mortality and improve respiratory outcomes.新生儿复苏期间持续充气与标准充气对预防死亡和改善呼吸结局的作用
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Mar 18;3(3):CD004953. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004953.pub4.
3
Impact of a mobile application for heart rate assessment in simulated neonatal resuscitation: a randomised controlled cross-over study.应用移动端程序评估新生儿复苏时心率的影响:一项随机对照交叉研究。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2020 Jan;105(1):41-44. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-316757. Epub 2019 May 17.
4
COVID-19 aerosol box as protection from droplet and aerosol contaminations in healthcare workers performing airway intubation: a randomised cross-over simulation study.COVID-19 气溶胶盒在气道插管医护人员中防止飞沫和气溶胶污染的效果:一项随机交叉模拟研究。
Emerg Med J. 2021 Feb;38(2):111-117. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2020-210514. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
5
Personal Protective Equipment Adherence of Pediatric Resuscitation Team Members During the COVID-19 Pandemic.儿科复苏团队成员在 COVID-19 大流行期间对个人防护设备的依从性。
Ann Emerg Med. 2021 Nov;78(5):619-627. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2021.05.022. Epub 2021 May 29.
6
Resuscitation of the patient with suspected/confirmed COVID-19 when wearing personal protective equipment: A randomized multicenter crossover simulation trial.疑似/确诊 COVID-19 患者穿戴个人防护装备时的复苏:一项随机多中心交叉模拟试验。
Cardiol J. 2020;27(5):497-506. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2020.0068. Epub 2020 May 18.
7
A Simulation Study Using a Quality Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Medical Manikin to Evaluate the Effects of Using Personal Protective Equipment on Performance of Emergency Resuscitation by Medical Students from the University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland and Non-Medical Personnel.一项使用心肺复苏质量模拟人评估波兰西里西亚大学卡托维兹分校医学生和非医务人员使用个人防护设备对急救复苏操作影响的模拟研究。
Med Sci Monit. 2022 Jul 2;28:e936844. doi: 10.12659/MSM.936844.
8
Laryngeal mask airway versus bag-mask ventilation or endotracheal intubation for neonatal resuscitation.喉罩气道与面罩通气或气管插管用于新生儿复苏的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 15;3(3):CD003314. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003314.pub3.
9
The use of personal protection equipment does not impair the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A prospective triple-cross over randomised controlled non-inferiority trial.使用个人防护设备不会降低心肺复苏质量:一项前瞻性三交叉随机对照非劣效性试验。
Resuscitation. 2021 Mar;160:79-83. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.01.021. Epub 2021 Jan 30.
10
Utility of the Pentax-AWS in performing tracheal intubation while wearing chemical, biological, radiation and nuclear personal protective equipment: a randomised crossover trial using a manikin.穿戴化学、生物、放射性和核个人防护装备时使用 Pentax-AWS 进行气管插管的效用:使用模拟人进行的随机交叉试验。
Emerg Med J. 2013 Jul;30(7):527-31. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2012-201463.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of Resuscitation and Simulation Team Training on the Outcome of Neonates with Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy in South Tyrol.复苏与模拟团队培训对南蒂罗尔地区新生儿缺氧缺血性脑病预后的影响
J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 28;14(3):854. doi: 10.3390/jcm14030854.
2
2023 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations: Summary From the Basic Life Support; Advanced Life Support; Pediatric Life Support; Neonatal Life Support; Education, Implementation, and Teams; and First Aid Task Forces.2023 年国际心肺复苏和紧急心血管护理科学共识及治疗推荐:基础生命支持、高级生命支持、儿科生命支持、新生儿生命支持、教育、实施和团队以及急救任务组的总结。
Circulation. 2023 Dec 12;148(24):e187-e280. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001179. Epub 2023 Nov 9.
3
Effects of personal protective equipment on cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality and outcomes: A systematic review.个人防护装备对心肺复苏质量和结果的影响:一项系统评价。
Resusc Plus. 2023 May 24;14:100398. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100398. eCollection 2023 Jun.