• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

护士主导的急性冠状动脉综合征后基于电话的随访可改善 36 个月后的风险因素:随机对照的 NAILED-ACS 试验。

Nurse-led, telephone-based follow-up after acute coronary syndrome yields improved risk factors after 36 months: the randomized controlled NAILED-ACS trial.

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Östersund, Umeå, Sweden.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Sep 6;11(1):17693. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-97239-x.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-97239-x
PMID:34489516
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8421439/
Abstract

We investigated whether a nurse-led, telephone-based follow-up including medical titration was superior to usual care in improving blood pressure (BP) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) values 36 months after acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We screened all patients admitted with ACS at Östersund hospital, Sweden, between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2014, for inclusion based on ability to participate in a telephone-based follow-up. Participants were randomly allocated to usual care or an intervention group that received counselling and medical titration to target BP < 140/< 90 mmHg and LDL-C < 2.5/< 1.8 mmol/L. The primary outcome was LDL-C at 36 months. Of 962 patients, 797 (83%) were available for analysis after 36 months. Compared to controls, the intervention group had a mean systolic BP (SBP) 4.1 mmHg lower (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9-6.5), mean diastolic BP (DBP) 2.9 mmHg lower (95% CI 1.5-4.5), and mean LDL-C 0.28 mmol/L lower (95% CI 0.135-0.42). All P < 0.001. A significantly greater proportion of patients reached treatment targets with the intervention. After 36 months of follow-up, compared to usual care, the nurse-led, telephone-based intervention led to significantly lower SBP, DBP, and LDL-C and to a larger proportion of patients meeting target values.Trial registration: ISRCTN registry. Trial number ISRCTN96595458. Retrospectively registered.

摘要

我们研究了在急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)发生 36 个月后,护士主导的、基于电话的随访(包括医学滴定)是否优于常规护理,从而改善血压(BP)和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)值。我们根据基于电话的随访能力筛选了瑞典Östersund 医院在 2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2014 年 12 月 31 日期间收治的所有 ACS 患者,以纳入研究。参与者被随机分配到常规护理组或干预组,干预组接受咨询和医学滴定,目标是 BP<140/<90mmHg 和 LDL-C<2.5/<1.8mmol/L。主要结局是 36 个月时的 LDL-C。在 962 名患者中,有 797 名(83%)在 36 个月后可进行分析。与对照组相比,干预组的收缩压(SBP)平均低 4.1mmHg(95%置信区间[CI] 1.9-6.5),舒张压(DBP)低 2.9mmHg(95% CI 1.5-4.5),低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)低 0.28mmol/L(95% CI 0.135-0.42)。所有 P 值均<0.001。接受干预的患者达到治疗目标的比例显著更高。与常规护理相比,经过 36 个月的随访,护士主导的、基于电话的干预可显著降低 SBP、DBP 和 LDL-C,且达到目标值的患者比例更高。试验注册:ISRCTN 注册处。试验编号 ISRCTN96595458。回顾性注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5633/8421439/01842db5906c/41598_2021_97239_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5633/8421439/d39882eed4a4/41598_2021_97239_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5633/8421439/1fba04de172f/41598_2021_97239_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5633/8421439/01842db5906c/41598_2021_97239_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5633/8421439/d39882eed4a4/41598_2021_97239_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5633/8421439/1fba04de172f/41598_2021_97239_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5633/8421439/01842db5906c/41598_2021_97239_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Nurse-led, telephone-based follow-up after acute coronary syndrome yields improved risk factors after 36 months: the randomized controlled NAILED-ACS trial.护士主导的急性冠状动脉综合征后基于电话的随访可改善 36 个月后的风险因素:随机对照的 NAILED-ACS 试验。
Sci Rep. 2021 Sep 6;11(1):17693. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-97239-x.
2
Nurse-led telephone-based follow-up of secondary prevention after acute coronary syndrome: One-year results from the randomized controlled NAILED-ACS trial.护士主导的急性冠状动脉综合征后二级预防电话随访:随机对照NAILED-ACS试验的一年结果。
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 8;12(9):e0183963. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183963. eCollection 2017.
3
Long-term, telephone-based follow-up after stroke and TIA improves risk factors: 36-month results from the randomized controlled NAILED stroke risk factor trial.中风和短暂性脑缺血发作后基于电话的长期随访可改善风险因素:随机对照NAILED中风风险因素试验的36个月结果。
BMC Neurol. 2018 Sep 21;18(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s12883-018-1158-5.
4
Nurse-Led, Telephone-Based, Secondary Preventive Follow-Up after Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack Improves Blood Pressure and LDL Cholesterol: Results from the First 12 Months of the Randomized, Controlled NAILED Stroke Risk Factor Trial.护士主导的基于电话的中风或短暂性脑缺血发作后二级预防性随访可改善血压和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇:随机对照NAILED中风危险因素试验前12个月的结果。
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 16;10(10):e0139997. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139997. eCollection 2015.
5
Nurse-led, telephone-based secondary preventive follow-up benefits stroke/TIA patients with low education: a randomized controlled trial sub-study.护士主导的电话随访二级预防对低学历中风/短暂性脑缺血发作患者有益:一项随机对照试验的子研究
Trials. 2019 Jan 15;20(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-3131-4.
6
Cardiovascular secondary prevention in high-risk patients: a randomized controlled trial sub-study.高危患者的心血管二级预防:一项随机对照试验的子研究
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2015 Oct 14;15:125. doi: 10.1186/s12872-015-0115-0.
7
Implementation of a new guideline in cardiovascular secondary preventive care: subanalysis of a randomized controlled trial.心血管二级预防护理新指南的实施:一项随机对照试验的亚组分析
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016 Apr 30;16:77. doi: 10.1186/s12872-016-0252-0.
8
Long-term secondary prevention and outcome following acute coronary syndrome: real-world results from the Swedish Primary Care Cardiovascular Database.长期二级预防和急性冠状动脉综合征后的结局:来自瑞典初级保健心血管数据库的真实世界结果。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2024 May 11;31(7):812-821. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwad389.
9
Implementation of a telephone-based secondary preventive intervention after acute coronary syndrome (ACS): participation rate, reasons for non-participation and 1-year survival.急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)后基于电话的二级预防干预措施的实施:参与率、未参与原因及1年生存率
Trials. 2016 Feb 15;17:85. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1203-x.
10
Statin treatment after acute coronary syndrome: Adherence and reasons for non-adherence in a randomized controlled intervention trial.急性冠状动脉综合征后他汀类药物治疗:一项随机对照干预试验中的依从性和不依从的原因。
Sci Rep. 2019 Aug 19;9(1):12079. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-48540-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Software for the care of people with cardiovascular risk: construction and evidence of validity.心血管疾病风险人群护理软件:构建与效度证据
Rev Bras Enferm. 2024 Dec 16;77(6):e20240276. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2024-0276. eCollection 2024.
2
Smoking cessation and prognosis during long-term follow-up after stroke, TIA, and acute coronary syndrome-results from the randomized controlled NAILED trial.戒烟与卒中和 TIA 及急性冠脉综合征长期随访期间的预后-NAILED 随机对照试验的结果。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 11;19(11):e0311955. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311955. eCollection 2024.
3
The effect of telemedicine on secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Statin treatment after acute coronary syndrome: Adherence and reasons for non-adherence in a randomized controlled intervention trial.急性冠状动脉综合征后他汀类药物治疗:一项随机对照干预试验中的依从性和不依从的原因。
Sci Rep. 2019 Aug 19;9(1):12079. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-48540-3.
2
Lifestyle and impact on cardiovascular risk factor control in coronary patients across 27 countries: Results from the European Society of Cardiology ESC-EORP EUROASPIRE V registry.27 个国家的冠心病患者生活方式及对心血管危险因素控制的影响:欧洲心脏病学会 ESC-EORP EUROASPIRE V 注册研究结果。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2019 May;26(8):824-835. doi: 10.1177/2047487318825350. Epub 2019 Feb 10.
3
远程医疗对动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病二级预防的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Nov 3;9:1020744. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1020744. eCollection 2022.
Patients' adherence to optimal therapeutic, lifestyle and risk factors recommendations after myocardial infarction: Six years follow-up in primary care.
心肌梗死后患者对最佳治疗、生活方式和危险因素建议的依从性:初级保健 6 年随访。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 4;13(9):e0202986. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202986. eCollection 2018.
4
Clinical inertia in the pharmacological management of hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis.高血压药物治疗中的临床惰性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jun;97(25):e11121. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011121.
5
2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).2017年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死患者管理指南:欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死患者管理工作组
Eur Heart J. 2018 Jan 7;39(2):119-177. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393.
6
Nurse-led telephone-based follow-up of secondary prevention after acute coronary syndrome: One-year results from the randomized controlled NAILED-ACS trial.护士主导的急性冠状动脉综合征后二级预防电话随访:随机对照NAILED-ACS试验的一年结果。
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 8;12(9):e0183963. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183963. eCollection 2017.
7
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2017 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.《2017年心脏病和中风统计数据更新:美国心脏协会报告》
Circulation. 2017 Mar 7;135(10):e146-e603. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000485. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
8
Long-term secondary prevention of acute myocardial infarction (SEPAT) - guidelines adherence and outcome.急性心肌梗死的长期二级预防(SEPAT)——指南依从性与结局
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016 Nov 17;16(1):226. doi: 10.1186/s12872-016-0400-6.
9
Association Between Lowering LDL-C and Cardiovascular Risk Reduction Among Different Therapeutic Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.不同治疗干预措施下降低低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)与心血管风险降低之间的关联:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
JAMA. 2016 Sep 27;316(12):1289-97. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.13985.
10
Initiation of and long-term adherence to secondary preventive drugs after acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死后二级预防药物的起始使用及长期依从性
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016 May 31;16:115. doi: 10.1186/s12872-016-0283-6.