Rimini Margherita, Yoo Changhoon, Lonardi Sara, Masi Gianluca, Granito Alessandro, Bang Yeonghak, Rizzato Mario Domenico, Vivaldi Caterina, Ielasi Luca, Kim Hyung-Don, Bergamo Francesca, Salani Francesca, Leoni Simona, Ryoo Baek-Yeol, Ryoo Min-Hee, Burgio Valentina, Cascinu Stefano, Casadei-Gardini Andrea
Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Policlinico of Modena, Via Del Pozzo n.71, 41122, Modena, Italy.
Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Target Oncol. 2021 Sep;16(5):653-661. doi: 10.1007/s11523-021-00834-1. Epub 2021 Sep 7.
The results of the pivotal RESORCE trial led to the approval of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor regorafenib as second-line treatment in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after sorafenib failure. Data about prognostic factors in a second-line HCC setting are scarce.
The aim of the present study was to investigate prognostic factors in a cohort of patients with advanced HCC treated with regorafenib after progressing on sorafenib.
We retrieved the data of 259 patients affected by advanced HCC treated with regorafenib as second-line treatment from four different Italian institutions and one South Korean institution and performed a recursive partitioning analysis to build a score system.
At the first-step univariate analysis for overall survival (OS), alkaline phosphatase (ALP) was the most significant parameter and was chosen as the first node in our tree model. In the subpopulation of patients presenting with ALP ≤122 U/L (n=155) at baseline, the most statistically significant split was by progression-free survival (PFS) on previous sorafenib treatment, between patients with a PFS ≥ 6 months (n = 59) and patients with a PFS < 6 months (n = 96). In the subpopulation of patients with ALP ≤ 122 U/L and PFS to sorafenib ≥ 6 months, the final split was determined between patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related liver disease (n = 22) and patients with no HBV-related liver disease (n = 37). In the subpopulation of patients presenting ALP >122 U/L (n = 104) at baseline, the most statistically significant split was by aspartate aminotransferase (AST) value, between patients with AST ≤ 56 U/L (n = 48) and patients with AST > 56 U/L (n = 56). We built the Regorafenib Prognostic Index (REP index) stratifying the population into "low-risk," "medium-risk," and "high-risk" groups. The difference in median OS between the three risk groups was statistically significant, being 20.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 10.0-46.3) in the "low-risk" group, 8.4 months (95% CI 7.2-1435.8) in the "medium-risk" group, and 5.5 months (95% CI 3.5-13.2) in the "high risk" group. The median PFS was 7.7 months (95% CI 3.7-19.3), 2.5 months (95% CI 2.1-28.8), and 2.4 months (95% CI 1.6-9.1) for the "low-risk," "medium-risk," and "high-risk" groups, respectively.
The REP index is an independent prognostic factor for OS and PFS in patients with advanced HCC treated with regorafenib.
关键的RESORCE试验结果促使酪氨酸激酶抑制剂瑞戈非尼被批准用于索拉非尼治疗失败后的晚期肝细胞癌(HCC)二线治疗。关于二线HCC患者预后因素的数据较少。
本研究旨在调查索拉非尼进展后接受瑞戈非尼治疗的晚期HCC患者队列中的预后因素。
我们从四个不同的意大利机构和一个韩国机构检索了259例接受瑞戈非尼二线治疗的晚期HCC患者的数据,并进行递归划分分析以建立评分系统。
在总生存期(OS)的第一步单变量分析中,碱性磷酸酶(ALP)是最显著的参数,并被选为我们树模型的第一个节点。在基线时ALP≤122 U/L(n = 155)的患者亚组中,最具统计学意义的划分是根据既往索拉非尼治疗的无进展生存期(PFS),PFS≥6个月的患者(n = 59)和PFS<6个月的患者(n = 96)。在ALP≤122 U/L且索拉非尼PFS≥6个月的患者亚组中,最终划分是在乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)相关肝病患者(n = 22)和无HBV相关肝病患者(n = 37)之间。在基线时ALP>122 U/L(n = 104)的患者亚组中,最具统计学意义的划分是根据天冬氨酸转氨酶(AST)值,AST≤56 U/L的患者(n = 48)和AST>56 U/L的患者(n = 56)。我们构建了瑞戈非尼预后指数(REP指数),将人群分为“低风险”、“中风险”和“高风险”组。三个风险组之间的中位OS差异具有统计学意义,“低风险”组为20.8个月(95%置信区间[CI]10.0 - 46.3),“中风险”组为8.4个月(95%CI 7.2 - 1435.8),“高风险”组为5.5个月(95%CI 3.5 - 13.2)。“低风险”、“中风险”和“高风险”组的中位PFS分别为7.7个月(95%CI 3.7 - 19.3)、2.5个月(95%CI 2.1 - 28.8)和2.4个月(95%CI 1.6 - 9.1)。
REP指数是接受瑞戈非尼治疗的晚期HCC患者OS和PFS的独立预后因素。