South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide;
School of Psychology, University of Adelaide, South Australia.
Public Health Res Pract. 2021 Sep 8;31(3):30452016. doi: 10.17061/phrp30452016.
An understanding of contextual factors that influence whether general practitioners advise their patients to be screened for colorectal cancer (CRC) might guide interventions to increase screening participation from its persistently low rate. We report on the use of a theory-based tool to explore contextual factors that might influence implementation of a novel quality improvement (QI) intervention to increase CRC screening in general practice (CRC-QI). The objective was to identify and incorporate strategies into the intervention that will enable flexible implementation across different practice settings.
A qualitative study to explore contextual facilitators of, and barriers to, the implementation of a novel CRC-QI intervention.
Eighteen staff, from three self-nominated general practices, participated in focus group discussions. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), which included constructs relevant to CRC screening in primary care, guided the formative evaluation. Findings were aligned to the CFIR model using a deductive thematic analysis.
Contextual facilitators of, and barriers to, the implementation of the CRC-QI intervention were identified in each CFIR domain and CRC-relevant construct. Five consistent themes were identified that potentially influence elements of the CRC-QI intervention: priority setting and incentives, information technology, patient-level barriers, clinical practice, and the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program (NBCSP). Participants proposed that incentive payments and NBCSP policy changes (outer-setting strategies) would facilitate organisational change (inner-setting strategies) and the effective implementation of the CRC-QI intervention.
There may be an opportunity to better engage general practice in CRC screening via outer-setting constructs that support existing clinical practice. For example, improvements to the National Cancer Screening Register and Quality Improvement Incentive - Practice Incentives Program (PIP) could be made without altering the NBCSP design.
了解影响全科医生是否建议患者进行结直肠癌(CRC)筛查的背景因素,可能有助于指导干预措施,以提高筛查参与率,使其不再处于持续低水平。我们报告了使用基于理论的工具来探索背景因素,这些因素可能会影响实施一项新的质量改进(QI)干预措施,以增加全科实践中的 CRC 筛查(CRC-QI)。目的是确定并将策略纳入干预措施中,以便在不同的实践环境中灵活实施。
一项旨在探讨实施新型 CRC-QI 干预措施的背景促进因素和障碍的定性研究。
来自三个自我提名的普通实践的 18 名工作人员参加了焦点小组讨论。以与初级保健中 CRC 筛查相关的构成为指导,对综合实施研究框架(CFIR)进行了前瞻性评估。使用演绎主题分析将研究结果与 CFIR 模型对齐。
在每个 CFIR 域和与 CRC 相关的构念中都确定了实施 CRC-QI 干预措施的促进因素和障碍。确定了五个一致的主题,这些主题可能会影响 CRC-QI 干预措施的各个方面:优先事项设置和激励、信息技术、患者层面的障碍、临床实践和国家结直肠癌筛查计划(NBCSP)。参与者提出,激励性支付和 NBCSP 政策变化(外部环境策略)将促进组织变革(内部环境策略)和 CRC-QI 干预措施的有效实施。
通过支持现有临床实践的外部环境构念,可能有机会更好地使全科医生参与 CRC 筛查。例如,无需改变 NBCSP 设计,就可以对国家癌症筛查登记处和质量改进激励计划-实践激励计划(PIP)进行改进。