• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发一个由有亲身经历者参与的在线自杀预防项目:思路与挑战。

Development of an online suicide prevention program involving people with lived experience: ideas and challenges.

作者信息

Dreier Mareike, Baumgardt Johanna, Bock Thomas, Härter Martin, Liebherz Sarah

机构信息

Department of Medical Psychology, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Sep 8;7(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00307-9.

DOI:10.1186/s40900-021-00307-9
PMID:34496972
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8424946/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Fear of stigmatization, self-stigmatization, and insufficient information can lead to secrecy, reduced help-seeking, lower self-esteem, and lower self-efficacy among people affected by suicidality or suicide. Therefore, we developed an online suicide prevention program aiming to improve knowledge about suicidality and suicide stigma.

METHODS

Inspired by the Australian program The Ripple Effect, a German team comprising people with lived experience of suicide, researchers, and clinicians was established for developing an online suicide prevention program. Therefore, we oriented on guidelines for evidence-based health information, for reporting on suicide, and on dealing with suicidality. The lived experience team discussed and developed concept, structure, and content of the program. This manuscript presents summaries of protocols from 16 team meetings and 3 written text reviews to outline the program development process. A summative evaluation 3 years after program development began was qualitatively analyzed based on thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Between 2018 und 2021, the lived experience team (n = 10) discussed possibilities of support in suicidal crises, attitudes towards suicide, content, and design of the online program. In a structured process, six members of the lived experience team reviewed the content. Eight persons shared their lived experience of suicide in video reports by focusing on constructive ways of dealing with suicidality or a loss by suicide, conveying hope and encouraging people to continue living. Team members recommended greater public and patient involvement from the application stage, as well as more financial and personnel resources.

CONCLUSIONS

Through contributions to discussions and text reviews, the lived experience team shaped decisions in the program development process. While involving persons with lived experiences of suicide, it is important to consider that suicidality is 1. emotionally challenging, 2. a stigmatized issue, and 3. that the aspect of safety must be a priority. A distinction must be made between the duty of care based on actual risk and inappropriate overprotection. Hereby, transparency, autonomy, and a clear structure appeared to be helpful. For further research, we recommend a structured formative review process of the development of the program. Additionally, we recommend discussing the purpose and the specific design of the evaluation with a lived experience team in advance. Trial registration German Clinical Trial RegisterDRKS00015071 on August 6, 2018.

摘要

背景

对污名化的恐惧、自我污名化以及信息不足,可能导致受自杀倾向或自杀影响的人群出现隐瞒行为、减少寻求帮助的行为、自尊心降低以及自我效能感降低。因此,我们开发了一个在线自杀预防项目,旨在提高对自杀倾向和自杀污名的认识。

方法

受澳大利亚项目“涟漪效应”的启发,成立了一个由有自杀经历的人、研究人员和临床医生组成的德国团队,以开发一个在线自杀预防项目。因此,我们以基于证据的健康信息指南、自杀报告指南以及处理自杀倾向的指南为导向。有自杀经历的团队讨论并制定了该项目的概念、结构和内容。本文呈现了16次团队会议和3次书面文本审查的方案总结,以概述项目开发过程。在项目开发开始3年后进行的总结性评估基于主题分析进行了定性分析。

结果

在2018年至2021年期间,有自杀经历的团队(n = 10)讨论了在自杀危机中提供支持的可能性、对自杀的态度、在线项目的内容和设计。在一个结构化的过程中,有自杀经历的团队的6名成员审查了内容。8人在视频报告中分享了他们的自杀经历,重点是应对自杀倾向或自杀造成的损失的建设性方法,传递希望并鼓励人们继续生活。团队成员建议在应用阶段让公众和患者更多地参与,以及提供更多的资金和人力资源。

结论

通过参与讨论和文本审查,有自杀经历的团队在项目开发过程中做出了决策。在让有自杀经历的人参与时,重要的是要考虑到自杀倾向:1. 在情感上具有挑战性;2. 是一个有污名的问题;3. 安全方面必须是优先事项。必须区分基于实际风险的护理责任和不适当的过度保护。因此,透明度、自主性和清晰的结构似乎是有帮助的。对于进一步的研究,我们建议对项目开发进行结构化的形成性审查过程。此外,我们建议提前与有自杀经历的团队讨论评估的目的和具体设计。试验注册 德国临床试验注册中心DRKS00015071,于2018年8月6日注册。

相似文献

1
Development of an online suicide prevention program involving people with lived experience: ideas and challenges.开发一个由有亲身经历者参与的在线自杀预防项目:思路与挑战。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Sep 8;7(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00307-9.
2
[Development of an online intervention on suicidality-providing knowledge and reducing suicide stigma].[一项关于自杀行为的在线干预措施的开发——提供知识并减少自杀污名]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2022 Jan;65(1):47-57. doi: 10.1007/s00103-021-03471-1. Epub 2021 Dec 13.
3
Development and evaluation of e-mental health interventions to reduce stigmatization of suicidality - a study protocol.电子心理健康干预措施的制定与评估以减少对自杀意念的污名化——研究方案
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 May 17;19(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2137-0.
4
Addressing help-seeking, stigma and risk factors for suicidality in secondary schools: short-term and mid-term effects of the HEYLiFE suicide prevention program in a randomized controlled trial.在中学解决求助、污名化和自杀风险因素:HEYLiFE 自杀预防计划在随机对照试验中的短期和中期效果。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jan 8;24(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17557-9.
5
Evaluation of an online suicide prevention program to improve suicide literacy and to reduce suicide stigma: A mixed methods study.评估一个在线预防自杀项目,以提高自杀知识水平和减少自杀污名化:一项混合方法研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 28;18(4):e0284944. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284944. eCollection 2023.
6
iSelf-Help: a co-designed, culturally appropriate, online pain management programme in Aotearoa.“自我帮助”:一项在新西兰共同设计的、符合文化背景的在线疼痛管理计划。
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Feb 21;8(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00339-9.
7
Engaging a person with lived experience of mental illness in a collaborative care model feasibility study.让有精神疾病亲身经历的人参与一项协作式照护模式可行性研究。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Jan 8;7(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s40900-020-00247-w.
8
Engagement of people with lived experience of dementia advisory group and cross-cutting program: reflections on the first year.让患有痴呆症的人参与咨询小组和跨部门项目:第一年的反思
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Jun 25;8(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00359-5.
9
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
10
Setting a lived experience agenda for rural suicidality research in Canada.为加拿大农村地区自杀问题研究设定生活经历议程。
Rural Remote Health. 2022 Nov;22(4):7559. doi: 10.22605/RRH7559. Epub 2022 Nov 23.

引用本文的文献

1
'Wisdom Is Knowledge Plus Experience': Qualitative Study of Lived Experience and Researcher Perspectives on Suicide Research Co-Production.“智慧即知识加经验”:关于自杀研究共同生产的生活经历与研究者观点的定性研究
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2025 Feb;34(1):e13507. doi: 10.1111/inm.13507.
2
Experiences of suicide survivors of sharing their stories about suicidality and overcoming a crisis in media and public talks: a qualitative study.自杀幸存者分享其自杀意念和危机经历的媒体和公开演讲经验:一项定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jan 10;24(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-17661-4.
3
Blending Video Therapy and Digital Self-Help for Individuals With Suicidal Ideation: Intervention Design and a Qualitative Study Within the Development Process.为有自杀意念的个体融合视频疗法与数字自助:干预设计及开发过程中的定性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Sep 21;7:e49043. doi: 10.2196/49043.
4
Lived experience perspectives guiding improvements to the Systematic Tailored Assessment for Responding to Suicidality protocol.生活经验视角指导改进应对自杀倾向的系统定制评估方案。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Jul 7;14:1074805. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1074805. eCollection 2023.
5
Active involvement of people with lived experience of suicide in suicide research: a Delphi consensus study.有自杀经历的人积极参与自杀研究:德尔菲共识研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Jul 11;23(1):496. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-04973-9.
6
Evaluation of an online suicide prevention program to improve suicide literacy and to reduce suicide stigma: A mixed methods study.评估一个在线预防自杀项目,以提高自杀知识水平和减少自杀污名化:一项混合方法研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 28;18(4):e0284944. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284944. eCollection 2023.
7
[Development of an online intervention on suicidality-providing knowledge and reducing suicide stigma].[一项关于自杀行为的在线干预措施的开发——提供知识并减少自杀污名]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2022 Jan;65(1):47-57. doi: 10.1007/s00103-021-03471-1. Epub 2021 Dec 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Suicide literacy and suicide stigma - results of a population survey from Germany.自杀素养和自杀污名化——来自德国的一项人口调查结果。
J Ment Health. 2022 Aug;31(4):517-523. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2021.1875421. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
2
The ripple effect: a digital intervention to reduce suicide stigma among farming men.涟漪效应:一项减少务农男性自杀污名的数字干预措施。
BMC Public Health. 2020 May 29;20(1):813. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08954-5.
3
Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy to Reduce Suicidal Ideation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.基于互联网的认知行为疗法降低自杀意念:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Apr 1;3(4):e203933. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3933.
4
Public Stigma Toward Persons with Suicidal Thoughts-Do Age, Sex, and Medical Condition of Affected Persons Matter?公众对有自杀念头者的污名化——患者的年龄、性别和健康状况是否重要?
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2020 Jun;50(3):631-642. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12629. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
5
Evaluating the impact of patient and carer involvement in suicide and self-harm research: A mixed-methods, longitudinal study protocol.评估患者及护理人员参与自杀与自残研究的影响:一项混合方法纵向研究方案。
Health Expect. 2021 May;24 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):47-53. doi: 10.1111/hex.13000. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
6
Development and evaluation of e-mental health interventions to reduce stigmatization of suicidality - a study protocol.电子心理健康干预措施的制定与评估以减少对自杀意念的污名化——研究方案
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 May 17;19(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2137-0.
7
Frameworks for supporting patient and public involvement in research: Systematic review and co-design pilot.支持患者和公众参与研究的框架:系统评价与协同设计试点
Health Expect. 2019 Aug;22(4):785-801. doi: 10.1111/hex.12888. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
8
Evaluating patient and public involvement in research.评估患者及公众参与研究的情况。
BMJ. 2018 Dec 6;363:k5147. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k5147.
9
Perceived suicide stigma, secrecy about suicide loss and mental health outcomes.对自杀耻辱感、自杀丧失的保密性与心理健康结果的关系。
Death Stud. 2020;44(4):248-255. doi: 10.1080/07481187.2018.1539052. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
10
Peer specialists in suicide prevention: Possibilities and pitfalls.预防自杀中的同伴专家:可能性与陷阱。
Psychol Serv. 2019 Aug;16(3):372-380. doi: 10.1037/ser0000255. Epub 2018 Nov 8.