• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Engaging a person with lived experience of mental illness in a collaborative care model feasibility study.让有精神疾病亲身经历的人参与一项协作式照护模式可行性研究。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Jan 8;7(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s40900-020-00247-w.
2
Implementation and evaluation of participatory advisory boards in mental health research: a research protocol of the 'PART-Beirat' project.心理健康研究中参与式咨询委员会的实施与评估:“PART-Beirat”项目的研究方案
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Dec 6;9(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00522-6.
3
Research evidence and implementation gaps in the engagement of people with lived experience in mental health and substance use research: a scoping review.有过精神健康和物质使用经历的人群参与心理健康和物质使用研究的研究证据与实施差距:一项范围综述
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 May 11;9(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00442-5.
4
Discussing the gaps in the science and practice of lived experience engagement in mental health and substance use research: results of knowledge mobilization activities.探讨心理健康与物质使用研究中生活经历参与的科学与实践差距:知识传播活动的结果
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Feb 10;10(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00554-6.
5
Right care, first time: a highly personalised and measurement-based care model to manage youth mental health.精准医疗,首次就诊:高度个性化和基于评估的青少年心理健康管理医疗模式。
Med J Aust. 2019 Nov;211 Suppl 9:S3-S46. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50383.
6
Actualizing community-academic partnerships in research: a case study on rural perinatal peer support.在研究中实现社区与学术机构的合作:一项关于农村围产期同伴支持的案例研究
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Dec 18;8(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00407-0.
7
Access to general practice for preventive health care for people who experience severe mental illness in Sydney, Australia: a qualitative study.澳大利亚悉尼患有严重精神疾病的人群获得预防性医疗保健的全科医疗服务情况:一项定性研究。
Aust J Prim Health. 2024 Jan 4. doi: 10.1071/PY23195.
8
Lived experience and family engagement in psychiatry research: A scoping review of reviews.精神科研究中的生活体验和家庭参与:综述的综述范围界定。
Health Expect. 2024 Jun;27(3):e14057. doi: 10.1111/hex.14057.
9
"Because of COVID…": The impacts of COVID-19 on First Nation people accessing the HIV cascade of care in Manitoba, Canada.“因为 COVID…": COVID-19 对加拿大马尼托巴省第一民族人群获取艾滋病毒护理服务的影响。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 2;18(8):e0288984. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288984. eCollection 2023.
10
Understanding the identity of lived experience researchers and providers: a conceptual framework and systematic narrative review.了解生活经验研究者和提供者的身份:一个概念框架和系统的叙述性综述。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Apr 24;9(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00439-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Fediša Modikologo: breaking the intergenerational cycle of violence against women and children. Theoretical framework and protocol for a prospective cohort study.费迪莎·莫迪科洛戈:打破针对妇女和儿童的暴力代际循环。一项前瞻性队列研究的理论框架和方案。
Wellcome Open Res. 2025 Mar 7;10:126. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23513.1. eCollection 2025.
2
Young People's Experiences Using a Digital Mental Health Tool to Support Their Care in a Real-World Service: Lived Experience-Led Qualitative Study.年轻人在现实世界服务中使用数字心理健康工具来支持其护理的经历:基于真实体验的定性研究。
JMIR Ment Health. 2025 Jun 23;12:e70154. doi: 10.2196/70154.
3
Participatory research with co-researchers with lived experience of psychosis high risk states.与有精神病高危状态亲身经历的共同研究者开展参与式研究。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jun 2;16:1530093. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1530093. eCollection 2025.
4
'We Are the Cornerstone of This Hospital': First-Hand Accounts of Expert-By-Experience Practices in Forensic Psychiatry in Finland.“我们是这家医院的基石”:芬兰法医精神病学中专家亲身实践的第一手记录
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2025 Jun;34(3):e70079. doi: 10.1111/inm.70079.
5
Adaptation of a Psychosocial Intervention for Canadian Youth at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis: Adaptation d'une intervention psychosociale pour les jeunes à haut risque clinique de psychose au Canada.针对加拿大临床高危精神病青年的心理社会干预措施的调整:加拿大针对临床高危精神病青年的心理社会干预措施的调整。
Can J Psychiatry. 2025 Apr 13:7067437251328357. doi: 10.1177/07067437251328357.
6
Co-design of "Baatcheet," a peer-supported, web-based storytelling intervention for young people with common mental health problems in India.“Baatcheet”的协同设计,这是一种为印度有常见心理健康问题的年轻人提供的由同伴支持的、基于网络的故事讲述干预措施。
Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2024 Dec 16;11:e128. doi: 10.1017/gmh.2024.148. eCollection 2024.
7
Exploring the subjective experience of researchers and co-researchers with lived experience of psychosis high risk states: a qualitative analysis within a participatory research process.探索有精神病高风险状态亲身经历的研究者和共同研究者的主观体验:参与式研究过程中的定性分析。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):899. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-06367-x.
8
Integrating expert patients perspectives on the processes of engaging them in early medical education.整合专家患者对于让他们参与早期医学教育过程的看法。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Nov 19;10(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00655-2.
9
Conducting mixed methods research with women in a forensic mental health setting: A reflexive account from a nurse as researcher.在法医心理健康环境中对女性进行混合方法研究:护士作为研究者的反思性叙述。
Nurs Open. 2024 Sep;11(9):e70038. doi: 10.1002/nop2.70038.
10
A systematic review of theories, models and frameworks used for youth engagement in health research.系统综述用于青年参与健康研究的理论、模型和框架。
Health Expect. 2024 Feb;27(1):e13975. doi: 10.1111/hex.13975.

本文引用的文献

1
Technology-enabled collaborative care for youth with early psychosis: A protocol for a feasibility study to improve physical health behaviours.技术支持的青少年早期精神病协作式护理:改善身体健康行为的可行性研究方案。
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2021 Aug;15(4):828-836. doi: 10.1111/eip.13018. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
2
Peer Support in Coordination of Physical Health and Mental Health Services for People With Lived Experience of a Serious Mental Illness.为有严重精神疾病生活经历者协调身心健康服务中的同伴支持
Front Psychiatry. 2020 May 8;11:365. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00365. eCollection 2020.
3
Preparing for patient partnership: A scoping review of patient partner engagement and evaluation in research.准备患者合作:患者伙伴参与和评估研究的范围综述。
Health Expect. 2020 Jun;23(3):523-539. doi: 10.1111/hex.13040. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
4
The Lancet Psychiatry Commission: a blueprint for protecting physical health in people with mental illness.《柳叶刀》精神病学委员会:保护精神疾病患者身体健康的蓝图。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2019 Aug;6(8):675-712. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30132-4. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
5
Lived Experience in New Models of Care for Substance Use Disorder: A Systematic Review of Peer Recovery Support Services and Recovery Coaching.物质使用障碍新型照护模式中的生活体验:同伴康复支持服务与康复指导的系统评价
Front Psychol. 2019 Jun 13;10:1052. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01052. eCollection 2019.
6
What happens when peer support workers are introduced as members of community-based clinical mental health service delivery teams: a qualitative study.当同伴支持工作者作为社区临床心理健康服务提供团队的成员被引入时会发生什么:一项定性研究。
J Interprof Care. 2020 Jan-Feb;34(1):107-115. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2019.1612334. Epub 2019 May 19.
7
Peer support in mental health services: where is the research taking us, and do we want to go there?心理健康服务中的同伴支持:研究将把我们带向何方,而我们是否想去那里?
J Ment Health. 2019 Aug;28(4):341-344. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2019.1608935. Epub 2019 May 9.
8
Involving people with lived experience in research on suicide prevention.让有实际经历的人参与自杀预防研究。
CMAJ. 2018 Nov 7;190(Suppl):S13-S14. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.180485.
9
People with lived experience (PWLE) of depression: describing and reflecting on an explicit patient engagement process within depression research priority setting in Alberta, Canada.有抑郁症亲身经历的人(PWLE):描述并反思加拿大艾伯塔省抑郁症研究优先事项设定中明确的患者参与过程。
Res Involv Engagem. 2018 Oct 16;4:37. doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0115-1. eCollection 2018.
10
"We're stronger if we work together": experiences of naturally occurring peer support in an inpatient setting.“如果我们共同努力,我们会更强大”:住院环境中自然产生的同伴支持的经验。
J Ment Health. 2019 Aug;28(4):419-426. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2018.1521925. Epub 2018 Oct 17.

让有精神疾病亲身经历的人参与一项协作式照护模式可行性研究。

Engaging a person with lived experience of mental illness in a collaborative care model feasibility study.

作者信息

Vojtila Lenka, Ashfaq Iqra, Ampofo Augustina, Dawson Danielle, Selby Peter

机构信息

Nicotine Dependence Clinic, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, 175 College Street, Toronto, ON, M5T1P, Canada.

Addictions Research Program, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Jan 8;7(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s40900-020-00247-w.

DOI:10.1186/s40900-020-00247-w
PMID:33419484
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7796603/
Abstract

Researchers have explored different types of treatment to help people with a mental illness with other problems they might be experiencing, such as their health condition and quality of life. Care models that involve many different health care providers working together to provide complete physical and mental health care are becoming popular. There has been a push from the research community to understand the value of including people with lived experience in such programs. While research suggests that people with lived experience may help a patient's treatment, there is little evidence on including them in a team based program. This paper describes how our research team included a person with lived experience of psychosis in both the research and care process. We list some guiding principles we used to work through some of the common challenges that are mentioned in research. Lastly, experiences from the research team, lessons learned, and a personal statement from the person with lived experience (AA) are provided to help future researchers and people with lived experience collaborate in research and healthcare. Background In our current healthcare system, people with a mental illness experience poorer physical health and early mortality in part due to the inconsistent collaboration between primary care and specialized mental health care. In efforts to bridge this gap, hospitals and primary care settings have begun to take an integrated approach to care by implementing collaborative care models to treat a variety of conditions in the past decade. The collaborative care model addresses common barriers to treatment, such as geographical distance and lack of individualized, evidence-based, measurement-based treatment. Person(s) with lived experience (PWLE) are regarded as 'experts by experience' in the scope of their first-hand experience with a diagnosis or health condition. Research suggests that including PWLE in a patient's care and treatment has significant contributions to the patient's treatment and overall outcome. However, there is minimal evidence of including PWLE in collaborative care models. This paper describes the inclusion of a PWLE in a research study and collaborative care team for youth with early psychosis. Aims To discuss the active involvement of a PWLE on the research and collaborative care team and to describe the research team's experiences and perspectives to facilitate future collaborations. Method This paper describes the inclusion of a PWLE on our research team. We provide a selective review of the literature on several global initiatives of including PWLE in different facets of the healthcare system. Additionally, we outline multiple challenges of involving PWLE in research and service delivery. Examples are provided on how recruitment and involvement was facilitated, with the guidance of several principles. Lastly, we have included a narrative note from the PWLE included in our study, who is also a contributing author to this paper (AA), where she comments on her experience in the research study. Conclusion Including PWLE in active roles in research studies and collaborative care teams can enhance the experience of the researchers, collaborative care team members, and PWLE. We showcase our method to empower other researchers and service providers to continue to seek guidance from PWLE to provide more comprehensive, collaborative care with better health outcomes for the patient, and a more satisfying care experience for the provider.

摘要

研究人员探索了不同类型的治疗方法,以帮助患有精神疾病的人解决他们可能面临的其他问题,比如他们的健康状况和生活质量。涉及许多不同医疗服务提供者共同努力提供全面身心健康护理的护理模式正变得越来越普遍。研究界一直在推动了解将有实际生活经验的人纳入此类项目的价值。虽然研究表明有实际生活经验的人可能有助于患者的治疗,但几乎没有证据表明将他们纳入基于团队的项目中。本文描述了我们的研究团队如何在研究和护理过程中纳入了一位有精神病实际生活经验的人。我们列出了一些指导原则,用于应对研究中提到的一些常见挑战。最后,提供了研究团队的经验、吸取的教训以及有实际生活经验的人(AA)的个人陈述,以帮助未来的研究人员和有实际生活经验的人在研究和医疗保健中进行合作。背景 在我们当前的医疗系统中,患有精神疾病的人身体健康较差且过早死亡,部分原因是初级保健和专业精神卫生保健之间缺乏协调合作。为了弥合这一差距,在过去十年中,医院和初级保健机构已开始采取综合护理方法,通过实施协作护理模式来治疗各种病症。协作护理模式解决了治疗中的常见障碍,如地理距离以及缺乏个性化、基于证据、基于测量的治疗。有实际生活经验的人(PWLE)在其对某种诊断或健康状况的第一手经验范围内被视为“经验专家”。研究表明,将有实际生活经验的人纳入患者的护理和治疗对患者的治疗及总体结果有重大贡献。然而,几乎没有证据表明将有实际生活经验的人纳入协作护理模式中。本文描述了将一名有实际生活经验的人纳入针对早期精神病青年的研究和协作护理团队的情况。目的 讨论有实际生活经验的人在研究和协作护理团队中的积极参与,并描述研究团队的经验和观点,以促进未来的合作。方法 本文描述了将一名有实际生活经验的人纳入我们的研究团队的情况。我们对关于将有实际生活经验的人纳入医疗系统不同方面的几个全球倡议的文献进行了选择性综述。此外,我们概述了让有实际生活经验的人参与研究和服务提供的多个挑战。提供了在若干原则的指导下促进招募和参与的示例。最后,我们纳入了我们研究中包含的有实际生活经验的人的叙述性记录,她也是本文的共同作者(AA),她在其中评论了自己在研究中的经历。结论 将有实际生活经验的人积极纳入研究和协作护理团队可以提升研究人员、协作护理团队成员以及有实际生活经验的人的体验。我们展示我们的方法,以促使其他研究人员和服务提供者继续向有实际生活经验的人寻求指导,从而为患者提供更全面、协作性更好的护理,实现更好的健康结果,并为提供者带来更令人满意的护理体验。