• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

烟草和尼古丁产品的人类滥用风险评估:满足当前监管建议的方法

Human Abuse Liability Assessment of Tobacco and Nicotine Products: Approaches for Meeting Current Regulatory Recommendations.

作者信息

Vansickel Andrea, Baxter Sarah, Sherwood Neil, Kong Michael, Campbell Leanne

机构信息

Regulatory Affairs, Altria Client Services LLC, Richmond, VA, USA.

Clinical Studies, RAI Services Company, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.

出版信息

Nicotine Tob Res. 2022 Feb 14;24(3):295-305. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntab183.

DOI:10.1093/ntr/ntab183
PMID:34498698
Abstract

Many regulatory bodies now recommend that tobacco product manufacturers provide information regarding new tobacco products' abuse liability to inform regulatory authorization of currently marketed tobacco products or new product applications (including premarket tobacco product applications in the United States). In addition, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommends including this information as part of modified risk tobacco product applications. Regulators, including FDA, and many public health officials and researchers consider abuse liability assessment a model which predicts the likelihood that the use of the tobacco product would result in addiction and be used repeatedly or even sporadically resulting in undesirable effects. Abuse liability of a new, potentially reduced harm product can also inform its ability to substitute completely for more harmful tobacco products. While many methods exist, no standard tobacco product abuse liability assessment has been established. The purpose of this review is to provide background information and practical recommendations for human abuse liability testing methods to meet tobacco regulatory needs. A combination of nicotine test product pharmacokinetic, subjective effect and/or behavioral response, and physiological response data relative to comparator products with known abuse liability satisfies some regulatory requirements. Implications: This review provides a practical inspection of the current, international regulatory recommendations for abuse liability assessment of tobacco and regulatory review of such information within the United States and also recommends study designs and methods for abuse liability testing of tobacco products based on scientific and regulatory knowledge. Given that tobacco product abuse liability testing is of increasing interest to regulatory bodies globally, especially with the emergence of novel tobacco products, this timely work provides background and functional recommendations for tobacco product abuse liability testing.

摘要

现在,许多监管机构建议烟草产品制造商提供有关新型烟草产品成瘾可能性的信息,以便为当前上市烟草产品的监管授权或新产品申请(包括美国的上市前烟草产品申请)提供依据。此外,美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)建议将此信息纳入改良风险烟草产品申请的一部分。包括FDA在内的监管机构以及许多公共卫生官员和研究人员认为,成瘾可能性评估是一种模型,可预测使用烟草产品导致成瘾并被反复使用甚至偶尔使用而产生不良影响的可能性。新型潜在危害较小产品的成瘾可能性也可表明其完全替代危害更大烟草产品的能力。虽然存在多种方法,但尚未建立标准的烟草产品成瘾可能性评估方法。本综述的目的是提供背景信息和关于人体成瘾可能性测试方法的实用建议,以满足烟草监管需求。将尼古丁测试产品的药代动力学、主观效应和/或行为反应以及与已知成瘾可能性的对照产品相关的生理反应数据相结合,可满足一些监管要求。启示:本综述对当前国际上关于烟草成瘾可能性评估的监管建议以及美国对此类信息的监管审查进行了实际考察,并根据科学和监管知识推荐了烟草产品成瘾可能性测试的研究设计和方法。鉴于全球监管机构对烟草产品成瘾可能性测试的兴趣日益浓厚,尤其是随着新型烟草产品的出现,这项及时开展的工作为烟草产品成瘾可能性测试提供了背景和实用建议。

相似文献

1
Human Abuse Liability Assessment of Tobacco and Nicotine Products: Approaches for Meeting Current Regulatory Recommendations.烟草和尼古丁产品的人类滥用风险评估:满足当前监管建议的方法
Nicotine Tob Res. 2022 Feb 14;24(3):295-305. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntab183.
2
Conference on abuse liability and appeal of tobacco products: conclusions and recommendations.滥用和吸引力评估会议烟草产品:结论和建议。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2011 Jul 1;116(1-3):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2010.12.009. Epub 2011 Mar 3.
3
Assessment of Abuse Liability and Nicotine Pharmacokinetics of glo Heated Tobacco Products in a Randomized, Crossover Study.加热不燃烧烟草制品滥用倾向评估及其尼古丁药代动力学的随机交叉研究。
Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2024 Nov;49(6):733-750. doi: 10.1007/s13318-024-00921-4. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
4
Abuse liability assessment of tobacco products including potential reduced exposure products.烟草制品(包括潜在减害产品)的滥用倾向评估。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009 Dec;18(12):3241-62. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0948.
5
A study of pyrazines in cigarettes and how additives might be used to enhance tobacco addiction.一项关于香烟中吡嗪以及添加剂如何用于增强烟草成瘾性的研究。
Tob Control. 2016 Jul;25(4):444-50. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051943. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
6
Consortium on Methods Evaluating Tobacco: Research Tools to Inform US Food and Drug Administration Regulation of Snus.方法评估烟草联盟:为美国食品和药物管理局监管口含烟提供研究工具。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2018 Sep 25;20(11):1292-1300. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntx228.
7
Abuse liability of two electronic nicotine delivery systems compared with combustible cigarettes and nicotine gum from an open-label randomized crossover study.一项开放标签随机交叉研究比较两种电子尼古丁输送系统与可燃香烟和尼古丁口香糖的滥用倾向。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 2;13(1):18951. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-45894-7.
8
Human abuse liability assessment of e-cigarettes: Why, what and how?电子烟的人体滥用倾向评估:为何、何为以及如何评估?
Drug Test Anal. 2023 Oct;15(10):1211-1221. doi: 10.1002/dta.3251. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
9
An abuse liability assessment of the glo tobacco heating product in comparison to combustible cigarettes and nicotine replacement therapy.加热不燃烧烟草制品与可燃香烟和尼古丁替代疗法的滥用倾向评估比较。
Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 29;12(1):14701. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19167-8.
10
Behavioral Economic Laboratory Research in Tobacco Regulatory Science.烟草监管科学中的行为经济学实验室研究。
Tob Regul Sci. 2016 Oct;2(4):440-451. doi: 10.18001/TRS.2.4.13.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of heated herbal products' tobacco harm reduction potential: pre-clinical and clinical studies.加热型草本产品降低烟草危害潜力的评估:临床前和临床研究
Front Toxicol. 2025 Aug 11;7:1589480. doi: 10.3389/ftox.2025.1589480. eCollection 2025.
2
A Pilot RCT Exploring Heated Tobacco Product Substitution for Menthol Cigarettes.一项探索加热烟草制品替代薄荷醇香烟的随机对照试验试点研究。
Am J Prev Med. 2025 Aug 3:108029. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2025.108029.
3
Flavoured Vaping Products in Tobacco Harm Reduction: A Regulatory Perspective.
烟草危害减少中的调味电子烟产品:监管视角
Cureus. 2025 Aug 1;17(8):e89196. doi: 10.7759/cureus.89196. eCollection 2025 Aug.
4
Randomized clinical studies assessing the pharmacokinetics and subjective effects of vuse alto electronic nicotine delivery systems.评估Vuse Alto电子尼古丁输送系统的药代动力学和主观效应的随机临床研究。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):21711. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-06716-0.
5
Bridging approaches to facilitate innovation: building an approach for heated tobacco products from case studies in the food and drug domains a comparative review.促进创新的衔接方法:从食品和药品领域的案例研究构建加热烟草制品的方法——一项比较性综述
Arch Toxicol. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1007/s00204-025-04081-5.
6
Randomized crossover clinical studies to assess abuse liability and nicotine pharmacokinetics of Velo Oral Nicotine pouches.评估Velo口腔尼古丁袋滥用可能性和尼古丁药代动力学的随机交叉临床研究。
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Mar 13;16:1547073. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1547073. eCollection 2025.
7
Assessment of Abuse Liability and Nicotine Pharmacokinetics of glo Heated Tobacco Products in a Randomized, Crossover Study.加热不燃烧烟草制品滥用倾向评估及其尼古丁药代动力学的随机交叉研究。
Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2024 Nov;49(6):733-750. doi: 10.1007/s13318-024-00921-4. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
8
Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Inhaled Nicotine Salt and Free-Base Using an E-cigarette: A Randomized Crossover Study.电子烟吸入尼古丁盐和游离碱的药代动力学和药效学:一项随机交叉研究。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2024 Sep 23;26(10):1313-1321. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntae074.
9
Tobacco-Free Nicotine Pouches and Their Potential Contribution to Tobacco Harm Reduction: A Scoping Review.无烟尼古丁袋及其对减少烟草危害的潜在贡献:一项范围综述。
Cureus. 2024 Feb 15;16(2):e54228. doi: 10.7759/cureus.54228. eCollection 2024 Feb.
10
Abuse liability of two electronic nicotine delivery systems compared with combustible cigarettes and nicotine gum from an open-label randomized crossover study.一项开放标签随机交叉研究比较两种电子尼古丁输送系统与可燃香烟和尼古丁口香糖的滥用倾向。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 2;13(1):18951. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-45894-7.