Department of Business, Gachon University, 1342 Seongnam-daero, Sujung-gu, Seongnam 13120, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.
Gachon Center for Convergence Research, Gachon University, 1342 Seongnam-daero, Sujung-gu, Seongnam 13120, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 26;18(17):9019. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18179019.
Despite numerous studies on multiple socio-economic factors influencing urban PM pollution in China, only a few comparable studies have focused on developed countries. We analyzed the impact of three major socio-economic factors (i.e., income per capita, population density, and population size of a city) on PM concentrations for 254 cities from six developed countries. We used the Stochastic Impacts by Regression on Population, Affluence and Technology (STIRPAT) model with three separate data sets covering the period of 2001 to 2013. Each data set of 254 cities were further categorized into five subgroups of cities ranked by variable levels of income, density, and population. The results from the multivariate panel regression revealed a wide variation of coefficients. The most consistent results came from the six income coefficients, all of which met the statistical test of significance. All income coefficients except one carried negative signs, supporting the applicability of the environmental Kuznet curve. In contrast, the five density coefficients produced statistically significant positive signs, supporting the results from previous studies. However, we discovered an interesting U-shaped distribution of density coefficients across the six subgroups of cities, which may be unique to developed countries with urban pollution. The results from the population coefficients were not conclusive, which is similar to the results of previous studies. Implications from the results of this study for urban and national policy makers are discussed.
尽管有许多研究探讨了影响中国城市 PM 污染的多种社会经济因素,但只有少数可比研究关注发达国家。我们分析了三个主要社会经济因素(即人均收入、人口密度和城市人口规模)对来自六个发达国家的 254 个城市的 PM 浓度的影响。我们使用了带有三个单独数据集的人口、富裕和技术的随机影响回归模型(STIRPAT),这些数据集涵盖了 2001 年至 2013 年的时间段。来自 254 个城市的每个数据集进一步分为五个收入、密度和人口变量水平的城市分组。多元面板回归的结果显示出系数的广泛差异。最一致的结果来自六个收入系数,它们都通过了统计显著性检验。除了一个之外,所有收入系数都带有负号,支持环境库兹涅茨曲线的适用性。相比之下,五个密度系数产生了具有统计学意义的正号,支持了之前研究的结果。然而,我们在六个城市分组中发现了密度系数的有趣的 U 形分布,这可能是具有城市污染的发达国家所特有的。人口系数的结果没有定论,这与之前研究的结果相似。讨论了本研究结果对城市和国家政策制定者的意义。