• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用计算机辅助转移夹具系统实现正畸托槽位置的三维数字叠加:准确性分析。

Three-Dimensional Digital Superimposition of Orthodontic Bracket Position by Using a Computer-Aided Transfer Jig System: An Accuracy Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Graduate School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Korea.

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Graduate School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Korea.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2021 Sep 2;21(17):5911. doi: 10.3390/s21175911.

DOI:10.3390/s21175911
PMID:34502801
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8434098/
Abstract

Accurate bracket placement is essential for successful orthodontic treatment. An indirect bracket bonding system (IDBS) has been developed to ensure proper bracket positioning with three-dimensional computer-aided transfer jigs. The purpose of this study was to investigate the accuracy of bracket positioning by a one-body transfer jig according to the tooth type and presence/absence of a resin base. In total, 506 teeth from 20 orthodontic patients were included in this study. After initial dental models were scanned, virtual setup and bracket positioning procedures were performed with 3D software. Transfer jigs and RP models were fabricated with a 3D printer, and brackets were bonded to the RP model with or without resin base fabrication. The best-fit method of 3D digital superimposition was used to evaluate the lineal and angular accuracy of the actual bracket position compared to a virtual bracket position. Although all the measurements showed significant differences in position, they were clinically acceptable. Regarding the tooth types, premolars and molars showed higher accuracy than anterior teeth. The presence or absence of a resin base did not consistently affect the accuracy. In conclusion, the proper application of IDBS should be performed considering the errors, and resin base fabrication might not be essential in ensuring high-accuracy IDBS.

摘要

准确的托槽定位对于成功的正畸治疗至关重要。为了确保托槽的正确定位,开发了一种间接托槽粘接系统(IDBS),该系统使用三维计算机辅助转移夹具。本研究的目的是根据牙型和树脂基的存在/缺失,研究一体转移夹具对托槽定位的准确性。本研究共纳入 20 名正畸患者的 506 颗牙齿。初始牙模扫描后,使用 3D 软件进行虚拟设置和托槽定位程序。使用 3D 打印机制作转移夹具和 RP 模型,并在 RP 模型上制作带或不带树脂基的托槽。使用 3D 数字叠加的最佳拟合方法,评估实际托槽位置与虚拟托槽位置的线性和角度精度。尽管所有测量值的位置都存在显著差异,但均在临床可接受范围内。关于牙型,前磨牙和磨牙的准确性高于前牙。树脂基的存在与否并不一致地影响准确性。总之,应考虑误差正确应用 IDBS,并且在确保高精度 IDBS 时,树脂基的制作可能不是必需的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3279/8434098/0430cc5c3bcd/sensors-21-05911-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3279/8434098/7eafc02a41d7/sensors-21-05911-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3279/8434098/f3ccb34f1dac/sensors-21-05911-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3279/8434098/69e7fcd7cd55/sensors-21-05911-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3279/8434098/2ac5be265c88/sensors-21-05911-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3279/8434098/4256c4bae4ce/sensors-21-05911-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3279/8434098/abeb30ce2842/sensors-21-05911-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3279/8434098/6ffeb9bf83ae/sensors-21-05911-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3279/8434098/824a6bf3d804/sensors-21-05911-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3279/8434098/ec6a252c671a/sensors-21-05911-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3279/8434098/0430cc5c3bcd/sensors-21-05911-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3279/8434098/7eafc02a41d7/sensors-21-05911-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3279/8434098/f3ccb34f1dac/sensors-21-05911-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3279/8434098/69e7fcd7cd55/sensors-21-05911-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3279/8434098/2ac5be265c88/sensors-21-05911-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3279/8434098/4256c4bae4ce/sensors-21-05911-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3279/8434098/abeb30ce2842/sensors-21-05911-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3279/8434098/6ffeb9bf83ae/sensors-21-05911-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3279/8434098/824a6bf3d804/sensors-21-05911-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3279/8434098/ec6a252c671a/sensors-21-05911-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3279/8434098/0430cc5c3bcd/sensors-21-05911-g010.jpg

相似文献

1
Three-Dimensional Digital Superimposition of Orthodontic Bracket Position by Using a Computer-Aided Transfer Jig System: An Accuracy Analysis.利用计算机辅助转移夹具系统实现正畸托槽位置的三维数字叠加:准确性分析。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Sep 2;21(17):5911. doi: 10.3390/s21175911.
2
Three-dimensional evaluation of the transfer accuracy of a bracket jig fabricated using computer-aided design and manufacturing to the anterior dentition: An study.使用计算机辅助设计与制造技术制作的托槽定位器转移至前牙列的准确性的三维评估:一项研究。
Korean J Orthod. 2021 Nov 25;51(6):375-386. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2021.51.6.375.
3
Accuracy of 3-dimensional printed bracket transfer tray using an in-office indirect bonding system.使用诊室间接粘接系统的 3 维打印托槽转移托盘的准确性。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2022 Jul;162(1):93-102.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.04.025.
4
Transfer accuracy of 3D-printed trays for indirect bonding of orthodontic brackets.3D 打印托盘间接粘接正畸托槽的转移精度。
Angle Orthod. 2022 May 1;92(3):372-379. doi: 10.2319/073021-596.1.
5
Comparison of the accuracy of bracket positioning between direct and digital indirect bonding techniques in the maxillary arch: a three-dimensional study.上颌弓中直接和数字间接粘接技术定位托槽准确性的比较:一项三维研究。
Prog Orthod. 2022 Sep 5;23(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s40510-022-00426-3.
6
Accuracy of bracket position using thermoplastic and 3D-printed indirect bonding trays.使用热塑型和 3D 打印间接粘接托盘的托槽定位准确性。
Int J Comput Dent. 2021 Jun 4;24(2):133-145.
7
Do the Various Indirect Bonding Techniques Provide the Same Accuracy for Orthodontic Bracket Placement? (Randomized Clinical Trial).各种间接粘结技术在正畸托槽放置上是否提供相同的准确性?(随机临床试验)
Int J Dent. 2024 Jan 22;2024:5455197. doi: 10.1155/2024/5455197. eCollection 2024.
8
Bracket transfer accuracy with two different three-dimensional printed transfer trays vs silicone transfer trays.两种不同的三维打印转移托盘与硅橡胶转移托盘的托槽转移准确性比较。
Angle Orthod. 2022 May 1;92(3):364-371. doi: 10.2319/040821-283.1.
9
Accuracy of indirect bonding trays - a measurement algorithm.间接粘接托盘的准确性 - 一种测量算法。
Int J Comput Dent. 2022 Sep 20;25(3):295-302. doi: 10.3290/j.ijcd.b2599775.
10
Comparison of three-dimensional printing guides and double-layer guide plates in accurate bracket placement.三种三维打印导板与双层导板在精确托槽定位中的比较。
BMC Oral Health. 2020 Apr 28;20(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01110-w.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Material and Processing Lag Time on Radiant Energy Penetration and Modulus of 3D-Printed Indirect Bonding Jig Materials.材料和加工延迟时间对3D打印间接粘结托槽材料辐射能穿透及模量的影响
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2025 Mar 21. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12923.
2
Influence of 3D printing angles on the accuracy of indirect adhesion transfer models: an in vitro study.3D打印角度对间接黏附转移模型准确性的影响:一项体外研究。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 15;15(1):9012. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-90328-1.
3
Simplified ABO-OGS orientation improves training of orthodontic bracket positioning for undergraduate dental students.

本文引用的文献

1
Three-dimensional evaluation of the transfer accuracy of a bracket jig fabricated using computer-aided design and manufacturing to the anterior dentition: An study.使用计算机辅助设计与制造技术制作的托槽定位器转移至前牙列的准确性的三维评估:一项研究。
Korean J Orthod. 2021 Nov 25;51(6):375-386. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2021.51.6.375.
2
Comparison of the transfer accuracy of two digital indirect bonding trays for labial bracket bonding.两种数字化间接粘接托盘用于唇侧粘接托槽的转移精度比较。
Angle Orthod. 2021 Jan 1;91(1):67-73. doi: 10.2319/013120-70.1.
3
Standard vs computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing customized self-ligating systems using indirect bonding with both.
简化的ABO-OGS定向改善了本科牙科学生正畸托槽定位的训练。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Feb 20;25(1):280. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06839-y.
4
Direct versus fully digital indirect bracket bonding: a split-mouth randomized clinical trial on accuracy.直接法与全数字化间接托槽粘接的准确性比较:一项随机分口临床试验。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Sep 28;28(10):557. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05950-6.
5
Transfer Accuracy of 3D-Printed Customized Devices in Digital Indirect Bonding: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.数字间接粘接中3D打印定制装置的转移准确性:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Int J Dent. 2023 Sep 16;2023:5103991. doi: 10.1155/2023/5103991. eCollection 2023.
6
Effect of fence tray matching care on excess adhesive and bracket placement accuracy for orthodontic bonding: an in vitro study.正畸粘接中托槽匹配护理对多余黏附剂和托槽位置准确性的影响:一项体外研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 May 12;24(1):555. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04348-w.
7
Do the Various Indirect Bonding Techniques Provide the Same Accuracy for Orthodontic Bracket Placement? (Randomized Clinical Trial).各种间接粘结技术在正畸托槽放置上是否提供相同的准确性?(随机临床试验)
Int J Dent. 2024 Jan 22;2024:5455197. doi: 10.1155/2024/5455197. eCollection 2024.
8
Clinical Study on Efficiency of Using Traditional Direct Bonding or OrthGuide Computer-Aided Indirect Bonding in Orthodontic Patients.临床研究传统直接粘结与 OrthGuide 计算机辅助间接粘结技术在正畸患者中的应用效率。
Dis Markers. 2022 Sep 29;2022:9965190. doi: 10.1155/2022/9965190. eCollection 2022.
9
Bracket Transfer Accuracy with the Indirect Bonding Technique-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.间接粘结技术的托槽转移准确性——一项系统评价与Meta分析
J Clin Med. 2022 May 4;11(9):2568. doi: 10.3390/jcm11092568.
10
New Frontier in Advanced Dentistry: CBCT, Intraoral Scanner, Sensors, and Artificial Intelligence in Dentistry.先进牙科的新领域:CBCT、口内扫描仪、传感器和牙科人工智能。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Apr 12;22(8):2942. doi: 10.3390/s22082942.
标准与计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造定制自锁系统,均采用间接粘结。
Angle Orthod. 2021 Jan 1;91(1):74-80. doi: 10.2319/012920-59.1.
4
Critical issues concerning biocreative strategy in contemporary temporary skeletal anchorage device orthodontics: A narrative review.当代临时骨锚固装置正畸中生物创造性策略的关键问题:叙述性综述。
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2021 Mar;24 Suppl 1:39-47. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12444. Epub 2020 Dec 7.
5
Measuring the accuracy of a computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing-based indirect bonding tray.测量基于计算机辅助设计与计算机辅助制造的间接粘结托盘的准确性。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020 Sep;158(3):315. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.06.018.
6
Computer-aided indirect bonding versus traditional direct bonding of orthodontic brackets: bonding time, immediate bonding failures, and cost-minimization. A randomized controlled trial.计算机辅助间接粘接与传统正畸托槽直接粘接的比较:粘接时间、即刻粘接失败和成本最小化。一项随机对照试验。
Eur J Orthod. 2021 Apr 3;43(2):144-151. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjaa045.
7
Three-dimensional evaluation of bracket placement accuracy and excess bonding adhesive depending on indirect bonding technique and bracket geometry: an in-vitro study.基于间接粘接技术和托槽几何形状的托槽放置准确性及多余粘接剂的三维评估:一项体外研究
Head Face Med. 2020 Aug 3;16(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13005-020-00231-5.
8
Accuracy evaluation of bracket repositioning by indirect bonding: hard acrylic CAD/CAM versus soft one-layer silicone trays, an in vitro study.间接粘接法重新定位托槽准确性的评估:硬质丙烯酸 CAD/CAM 与软单层硅橡胶托盘的比较,一项体外研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Nov;24(11):3889-3897. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03256-x. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
9
The Indirect Bonding Technique in Orthodontics-A Narrative Literature Review.正畸学中的间接粘结技术——一篇叙述性文献综述
Materials (Basel). 2020 Feb 22;13(4):986. doi: 10.3390/ma13040986.
10
Accurate bracket placement using a computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing-guided bonding device: An in vivo study.利用计算机辅助设计和计算机辅助制造引导粘接装置实现精确托槽定位:一项体内研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020 Feb;157(2):269-277. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.03.022.