• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肩袖修复术后肩周囊肿形成的长期随访

Long-term follow-up of perianchor cyst formation after rotator cuff repair.

作者信息

Matijakovich Douglas, Solomon David, Benitez Carlos L, Huang Hsin-Hui, Poeran Jashvant, Berger Natalie, Lebaschi Amir, Seneviratne Aruna

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA.

Department of Radiology, Mount Sinai West, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

JSES Int. 2021 Jul 13;5(5):863-868. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2021.05.010. eCollection 2021 Sep.

DOI:10.1016/j.jseint.2021.05.010
PMID:34505097
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8411048/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Perianchor cyst formation (PCF) can occur after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) anchors; however, little is known about PCF after all-suture anchor (ASA) use.

METHODS

We reviewed patients who underwent double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair from 2012 to 2017 with ASAs implanted in the medial row and PLLA anchors in the lateral row. We evaluated PCF (graded on magnetic resonance imaging) and compared physical examination and functional surveys between patients with PCF (WC) and without PCF (WoC) at long-term follow-up.

RESULTS

Among twenty-two patients (23 shoulders), 93% of PLLA anchors (vs. 79% ASA) displayed a grade 0 PCF,  = .100. No PLLA anchors had a grade 3 or 4 PCF, compared to 11% of ASAs,  = .158. At a mean postoperative follow-up time of 113 weeks, there was no significant difference between WC and WoC cohorts with regard to range of motion, rotator cuff strength, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons survey scores, or retear rates. However, the WoC cohort had a significantly higher University of California at Los Angeles shoulder survey score at final follow-up (34.3 WoC vs. 30.9 WC,  = .024).

CONCLUSION

No difference was found in PCF between ASAs and PLLA anchors. At long-term follow-up, WoC patients had significantly improved functional outcome scores, based on the University of California at Los Angeles survey, but equivalent range of motion and rotator cuff strength examinations compared with WC patients.

摘要

背景

使用聚左旋乳酸(PLLA)锚钉进行关节镜下肩袖修复术后可能会形成关节周围囊肿(PCF);然而,对于使用全缝线锚钉(ASA)后的PCF情况知之甚少。

方法

我们回顾了2012年至2017年接受双排关节镜下肩袖修复的患者,内侧排植入ASA,外侧排植入PLLA锚钉。我们评估了PCF(通过磁共振成像分级),并在长期随访中比较了有PCF(WC)和无PCF(WoC)患者的体格检查和功能调查结果。

结果

在22例患者(23个肩部)中,93%的PLLA锚钉(相比之下79%的ASA)显示为0级PCF,P = 0.100。没有PLLA锚钉出现3级或4级PCF,而ASA为11%,P = 0.158。术后平均随访时间为113周,WC组和WoC组在活动范围、肩袖力量、美国肩肘外科医师协会调查评分或再撕裂率方面没有显著差异。然而,在最终随访时,WoC组的加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校肩部调查评分显著更高(WoC组为34.3,WC组为30.9,P = 0.024)。

结论

ASA和PLLA锚钉在PCF方面没有差异。在长期随访中,根据加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校的调查,WoC患者的功能结局评分有显著改善,但与WC患者相比,活动范围和肩袖力量检查结果相当。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/299f/8411048/8d434bc23f8e/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/299f/8411048/7da68cb8b874/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/299f/8411048/8d434bc23f8e/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/299f/8411048/7da68cb8b874/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/299f/8411048/8d434bc23f8e/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Long-term follow-up of perianchor cyst formation after rotator cuff repair.肩袖修复术后肩周囊肿形成的长期随访
JSES Int. 2021 Jul 13;5(5):863-868. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2021.05.010. eCollection 2021 Sep.
2
Perianchor cyst formation in all-suture anchor after rotator cuff repair: an evaluation of anchor insertion angle.全缝线锚修复肩袖撕裂后周围锚钉囊肿的形成:锚钉置入角度的评估。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022 Sep;31(9):1831-1839. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.02.028. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
3
Perianchor Cyst Formation Around Biocomposite Biodegradable Suture Anchors After Rotator Cuff Repair.肩袖修复术后生物复合可生物降解缝线锚周围的关节周囊肿形成
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Dec;43(12):2907-12. doi: 10.1177/0363546515608484. Epub 2015 Oct 19.
4
Perianchor Cyst Formation After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Using All-Suture-Type, Bioabsorbable-Type, and PEEK-Type Anchors.关节镜下使用全缝线型、生物可吸收型和 PEEK 型锚钉修复肩袖撕裂后盂肱下囊的形成。
Arthroscopy. 2019 Aug;35(8):2284-2292. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.03.032. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
5
The formation of perianchor fluid associated with various suture anchors used in rotator cuff repair: all-suture, polyetheretherketone, and biocomposite anchors.各种肩袖修复中使用的缝合锚钉(全缝线、聚醚醚酮和生物复合材料锚钉)相关的锚钉周围积液的形成。
Bone Joint J. 2019 Dec;101-B(12):1506-1511. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B12.BJJ-2019-0462.R2.
6
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair With Absorbable Sutures in the Medial-Row Anchors.在内排锚钉中使用可吸收缝线的关节镜下肩袖修复术。
Arthroscopy. 2015 Nov;31(11):2099-105. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.04.094. Epub 2015 Jun 27.
7
Changes in Perianchor Cyst Formation Over Time After Rotator Cuff Repair: Influential Factors and Outcomes.肩袖修补术后肩袖锚定囊肿形成时间变化:影响因素及结果。
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Jan;47(1):165-172. doi: 10.1177/0363546518810517. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
8
Repair integrity and functional outcome after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: double-row versus suture-bridge technique.关节镜下肩袖修复后修复完整性和功能结果:双排与缝线桥技术。
Am J Sports Med. 2012 Feb;40(2):294-9. doi: 10.1177/0363546511425657. Epub 2011 Nov 10.
9
Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes of Combined Use of Biocomposite and PEEK Suture Anchors during Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Prospective Observational Study.关节镜下肩袖修复术中生物复合材料与聚醚醚酮缝线锚钉联合使用的临床和放射学结果:一项前瞻性观察研究
J Clin Med. 2020 Aug 6;9(8):2545. doi: 10.3390/jcm9082545.
10
Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Rotator Cuff Repairs Using All-Suture Anchors as Medial Row Anchors.使用全缝线锚钉作为内侧排锚钉进行肩袖修复的临床和影像学结果
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2021 Sep;9(5):527-535. doi: 10.22038/abjs.2021.52827.2654.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of All-Suture Anchors and Metal Anchors in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: Short-Term Clinical Outcomes and Anchor Pullout Risk.关节镜下肩袖修补术中全缝线锚钉与金属锚钉的比较:短期临床疗效及锚钉拔出风险
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 11;14(8):2619. doi: 10.3390/jcm14082619.
2
The Relationship Between All-Suture and Solid Medial-Row Anchors and Patient-Reported Outcomes for Double-Row Suture Bridge Rotator Cuff Repair.全缝线与实心内侧排锚钉在双排缝线桥修复肩袖中的关系及患者报告结局
Orthop J Sports Med. 2024 Aug 7;12(8):23259671241262264. doi: 10.1177/23259671241262264. eCollection 2024 Aug.
3
Association of Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis With Improved Graft Maturity on MRI 2 Years After ACL Reconstruction With Quadriceps Tendon Autograft in Skeletally Immature Athletes.

本文引用的文献

1
A Comparison of Open-Construct PEEK Suture Anchor and Non-Vented Biocomposite Suture Anchor in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial.开放式聚醚醚酮缝线锚钉与无通气生物复合材料缝线锚钉在关节镜肩袖修复中的比较:一项前瞻性随机临床试验。
Arthroscopy. 2020 Feb;36(2):389-396. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.08.049. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
2
The formation of perianchor fluid associated with various suture anchors used in rotator cuff repair: all-suture, polyetheretherketone, and biocomposite anchors.各种肩袖修复中使用的缝合锚钉(全缝线、聚醚醚酮和生物复合材料锚钉)相关的锚钉周围积液的形成。
Bone Joint J. 2019 Dec;101-B(12):1506-1511. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B12.BJJ-2019-0462.R2.
3
在骨骼未成熟运动员中,采用股四头肌肌腱自体移植进行前交叉韧带重建术后2年,外侧关节外肌腱固定术与MRI上移植物成熟度改善的相关性。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2024 Jan 3;12(1):23259671231211885. doi: 10.1177/23259671231211885. eCollection 2024 Jan.
4
Biodegradable vs nonbiodegradable suture anchors for rotator cuff repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.用于肩袖修复的可生物降解与不可生物降解缝合锚钉:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
EFORT Open Rev. 2023 Oct 3;8(10):731-747. doi: 10.1530/EOR-23-0012.
5
Rotator cuff repair with biodegradable high-purity magnesium suture anchor in sheep model.在绵羊模型中使用可生物降解的高纯度镁缝线锚钉进行肩袖修复。
J Orthop Translat. 2022 Sep 10;35:62-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2022.07.008. eCollection 2022 Jul.
Perianchor Cyst Formation After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Using All-Suture-Type, Bioabsorbable-Type, and PEEK-Type Anchors.
关节镜下使用全缝线型、生物可吸收型和 PEEK 型锚钉修复肩袖撕裂后盂肱下囊的形成。
Arthroscopy. 2019 Aug;35(8):2284-2292. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.03.032. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
4
Single Vs Double row repair in rotator cuff tears - A review and analysis of current evidence.肩袖撕裂的单排与双排修复——当前证据的综述与分析
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2019 Mar-Apr;10(2):236-240. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2019.01.027. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
5
Changes in Perianchor Cyst Formation Over Time After Rotator Cuff Repair: Influential Factors and Outcomes.肩袖修补术后肩袖锚定囊肿形成时间变化:影响因素及结果。
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Jan;47(1):165-172. doi: 10.1177/0363546518810517. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
6
Rotator cuff repair with all-suture anchors: a midterm magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of repair integrity and cyst formation.全缝线锚钉修复肩袖:修复完整性和囊形成的中期磁共振成像评估。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Nov;27(11):2006-2012. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.03.006. Epub 2018 May 22.
7
Do functional outcomes and cuff integrity correlate after single- versus double-row rotator cuff repair? A systematic review and meta-analysis study.单排与双排肩袖修复术后功能结果与袖带完整性是否相关?一项系统评价和荟萃分析研究。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2018 May;28(4):593-605. doi: 10.1007/s00590-018-2145-7. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
8
Radiological and clinical outcome of arthroscopic labral repair with all-suture anchors.使用全缝线锚钉进行关节镜下盂唇修复的放射学和临床结果。
Acta Orthop Belg. 2016 Aug;82(2):174-178.
9
Serial MRI evaluation following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in double-row technique.关节镜下双排技术修复肩袖后的系列磁共振成像评估
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016 May;136(5):665-72. doi: 10.1007/s00402-016-2409-9. Epub 2016 Feb 2.
10
Perianchor Cyst Formation Around Biocomposite Biodegradable Suture Anchors After Rotator Cuff Repair.肩袖修复术后生物复合可生物降解缝线锚周围的关节周囊肿形成
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Dec;43(12):2907-12. doi: 10.1177/0363546515608484. Epub 2015 Oct 19.