Nido R. Qubein School of Communication, High Point University, High Point, North Carolina (Drs Vaala and Ritter); Departments of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics (Dr Palakshappa) and Division of Public Health Sciences (Dr Palakshappa), Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2022;28(2):E586-E594. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001427.
Public health officials and celebrities use social media to provide guidance to reduce the spread of COVID-19. Messages apply different promotional strategies to motivate behavior change, likely yielding divergent reactions from partisan audiences. The Extended Parallel Process Model (EPPM) suggests that perceived threat for a negative outcome should impact perceived need for the advocated health behavior, which should be more appealing to an audience if perceived it to be efficacious and feasible.
This study examines the interactive effects of Tweet source, message emotional appeal, and audience political affiliation on US adults' perceptions of COVID-19 threat and social distancing efficacy during early months of the pandemic.
This online survey experiment applies the EPPM to assess US adults' reactions to tweets encouraging social distancing. The experiment tests 3 emotional appeals (fear, humor, and neutral) and 2 sources (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC] and celebrity) on adults' emotional reactions and perceptions of COVID-19 threat and social distancing efficacy.
The final sample included 415 US adults (242 Democrat and 173 Republican) recruited through Amazon's Mechanical Turk.
Outcome measures were adapted from the EPPM and include perceived susceptibility to and severity of COVID-19, and response efficacy and self-efficacy regarding social distancing. Each was measured through the survey on a 7-point response scale.
Humor and fear appeal messages evoked less fear and guilt responses than a neutral tweet from the CDC. Fear and guilt emotions predicted greater perceived threat, while hope and pride predicted efficacy constructs in relationships moderated by political ideology.
Public health messages targeting a bipartisan audience through social media may increase perceived threat by inducing fear of COVID-19 infection. EPPM theory suggests boosting efficacy is also critical to message acceptance and behavior change; thus, inducing feelings of hope and pride in addition to fear may be particularly effective.
公共卫生官员和名人利用社交媒体提供指导,以减少 COVID-19 的传播。信息应用不同的促销策略来激励行为改变,这可能会导致党派观众产生不同的反应。扩展平行过程模型(EPPM)表明,对负面结果的感知威胁应该影响对所倡导的健康行为的感知需求,如果观众认为该行为有效且可行,则该行为更具吸引力。
本研究考察了推文来源、信息情感诉求和受众政治倾向在大流行早期对美国成年人对 COVID-19 威胁和社交距离有效性的看法的相互影响。
这项在线调查实验应用 EPPM 来评估美国成年人对鼓励社交距离的推文的反应。该实验测试了 3 种情感诉求(恐惧、幽默和中性)和 2 个来源(疾病控制与预防中心[CDC]和名人)对成年人对 COVID-19 威胁和社交距离有效性的情感反应和看法的影响。
最终样本包括通过亚马逊 Mechanical Turk 招募的 415 名美国成年人(242 名民主党人和 173 名共和党人)。
因变量是从 EPPM 中改编而来的,包括对 COVID-19 的易感性和严重程度,以及对社交距离的反应效能和自我效能的看法。每个变量都是通过调查在 7 点反应量表上进行测量的。
与来自 CDC 的中性推文相比,幽默和恐惧诉求信息引起的恐惧和内疚反应较少。恐惧和内疚情绪预测了更大的感知威胁,而希望和自豪情绪预测了在政治意识形态调节的关系中的效能结构。
通过社交媒体向两党受众传递公共卫生信息可能会通过引起对 COVID-19 感染的恐惧来增加感知威胁。EPPM 理论表明,提高效能对于信息接受和行为改变也至关重要;因此,除了恐惧之外,引起希望和自豪的感觉可能会特别有效。