Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 166 Gumiro Bundang-gu, Seongnam, South Korea.
Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University, School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Eur Heart J. 2021 Nov 21;42(44):4578-4588. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab619.
With the high prevalence of gout and associated cardiovascular (CV) diseases, information on the comparative CV safety of individual urate-lowering drugs becomes increasingly important. However, few studies examined the CV risk of uricosuric agents. We compared CV risk among patients with gout who initiated allopurinol vs. benzbromarone.
Using the Korean National Health Insurance claims data (2002-17), we conducted a cohort study of 124 434 gout patients who initiated either allopurinol (n = 103 695) or benzbromarone (n = 20 739), matched on propensity score at a 5:1 ratio. The primary outcome was a composite CV endpoint of myocardial infarction, stroke/transient ischaemic attack, or coronary revascularization. To account for competing risk of death, we used cause-specific hazard models to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the outcomes comparing allopurinol initiators with benzbromarone. Over a mean follow-up of 1.16 years, 2258 patients developed a composite CV event. The incidence rate of the composite CV event was higher in allopurinol initiators (1.81 per 100 person-years) than benzbromarone (1.61 per 100 person-years) with a HR of 1.22 (95% CI 1.05-1.41). The HR for all-cause mortality was 1.66 (95% CI 1.43-1.93) among allopurinol initiators compared with benzbromarone.
In this large population-based cohort of gout patients, allopurinol was associated with an increased risk of composite CV events and all-cause mortality compared to benzbromarone. Benzbromarone may reduce CV risk and mortality in patients with gout, although more studies are necessary to confirm our findings and to advance our understanding of the underlying mechanisms.
鉴于痛风及相关心血管(CV)疾病的高发,了解各种降尿酸药物在 CV 安全性方面的差异变得越来越重要。然而,目前仅有少数研究探讨了促尿酸排泄药物的 CV 风险。本研究比较了起始应用别嘌醇与苯溴马隆的痛风患者的 CV 风险。
利用韩国国家健康保险索赔数据(2002-17 年),我们开展了一项队列研究,共纳入 124434 例起始应用别嘌醇(n=103695)或苯溴马隆(n=20739)的痛风患者,采用倾向评分 5:1 匹配。主要结局为心肌梗死、卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作或冠状动脉血运重建的复合 CV 终点。为了考虑死亡的竞争风险,我们采用竞争风险比例风险模型估计别嘌醇组与苯溴马隆组间结局的风险比(HR)及其 95%置信区间(CI)。平均随访 1.16 年后,2258 例患者发生了复合 CV 事件。别嘌醇组复合 CV 事件的发生率(1.81/100 人年)高于苯溴马隆组(1.61/100 人年),HR 为 1.22(95%CI 1.05-1.41)。与苯溴马隆相比,别嘌醇组的全因死亡率 HR 为 1.66(95%CI 1.43-1.93)。
在这项大型基于人群的痛风患者队列中,与苯溴马隆相比,别嘌醇会增加复合 CV 事件和全因死亡率的风险。虽然还需要更多的研究来证实我们的发现并深入了解潜在的机制,但苯溴马隆可能会降低痛风患者的 CV 风险和死亡率。