Koc University School of Nursing, Department of Fundamental Nursing, İstanbul, Turkey.
J Tissue Viability. 2021 Nov;30(4):484-488. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2021.09.001. Epub 2021 Sep 10.
This study aimed to determine the problems faced by physicians and nurses dealing with chronic wound care during the COVID-19 pandemic and their views on telehealth.
A descriptive and cross-sectional design was used in this study. The sample comprised physicians (n = 74) and nurses (n = 271) interested in chronic wound care. Data were collected through a questionnaire form consisting of open- and closed-ended questions.
Of the participants, 21.4% (n = 74) were physicians and 78.6% (n = 271) were nurses. Of the physicians, 45.9% (n = 34) were obliged to work in another unit during the COVID-19 period, while 43.2% continued their service related to chronic wound care, and only 17.0% (n = 18) in the wound care service before the pandemic. These rates are 51.3% (n = 139), 51.6% (n = 157) and 36.8% (n = 128) for nurses, respectively. 40.7% of the physicians (n = 33) and 34.9% of the nurses (n = 106) stated that their time had been reduced for chronic wound care. When the telehealth experiences were examined, 32.4% (n = 24) of the physicians utilized telehealth, 29.7% (n = 22) used e-visit, 77.0% (n = 57) stated that they thought telehealth was a good option, 47.3% (n = 35) utilized it for wound evaluation and treatment, and 31.9% (n = 59) used smart phones. These rates for nurses were 16.6% (n = 45), 14.0% (n = 38), 72.7% (n = 197), 33.9% (n = 92), and 27.0% (n = 182), respectively.
The COVID-19 pandemic negatively affected the manner of delivery, duration, and quality of service regarding wound management. During this period, face-to-face contact times with patients were reduced, some diagnosis and treatment attempts were not performed, and wound care services were suspended temporarily or permanently. On the other hand, a positive result was achieved in that the physicians and nurses gave positive feedback for the telehealth experience.
本研究旨在确定在 COVID-19 大流行期间处理慢性伤口护理的医生和护士所面临的问题,以及他们对远程医疗的看法。
本研究采用描述性和横断面设计。样本包括对慢性伤口护理感兴趣的医生(n=74)和护士(n=271)。通过一份由开放式和封闭式问题组成的问卷收集数据。
参与者中,21.4%(n=74)为医生,78.6%(n=271)为护士。在医生中,45.9%(n=34)在 COVID-19 期间被迫在其他科室工作,而 43.2%继续从事与慢性伤口护理相关的工作,只有 17.0%(n=18)在大流行前在伤口护理服务中工作。这些比例分别为护士的 51.3%(n=139)、51.6%(n=157)和 36.8%(n=128)。40.7%的医生(n=33)和 34.9%的护士(n=106)表示,他们用于慢性伤口护理的时间减少了。当检查远程医疗体验时,32.4%的医生(n=24)使用了远程医疗,29.7%的医生(n=22)使用了电子就诊,77.0%的医生(n=57)认为远程医疗是一个不错的选择,47.3%的医生(n=35)将其用于伤口评估和治疗,31.9%的医生(n=59)使用智能手机。护士的这些比例分别为 16.6%(n=45)、14.0%(n=38)、72.7%(n=197)、33.9%(n=92)和 27.0%(n=182)。
COVID-19 大流行对伤口管理的服务方式、持续时间和服务质量产生了负面影响。在此期间,与患者的面对面接触时间减少,一些诊断和治疗尝试未进行,伤口护理服务暂时或永久暂停。另一方面,医生和护士对远程医疗体验给予了积极反馈,这是一个积极的结果。