Suppr超能文献

细胞病理学作者工作的影响:基于开放获取细胞病理学出版物与非开放获取传统出版物的比较分析。

Impact of cytopathology authors work: Comparative analysis based on Open-access cytopathology publications non-Open-access conventional publications.

作者信息

Kolpekwar Janavi A, Shidham Vinod B

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, United States.

出版信息

Cytojournal. 2021 Aug 28;18:20. doi: 10.25259/Cytojournal_32_2021. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Open access (OA) is based on a set of principles and a range of practices through which fruits of research are distributed online, free of cost, or other access barriers. According to the 2001 definition, OA publications are without barriers to copy or reuse with free access to readers. Some studies have reported higher rates of citation for OA publications. In this study, we analyzed the citation rates of OA and traditional nonOA (with or without free access) publications for authors publishing in the subspecialty of cytopathology during 2010-2015.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We observed and compared citation patterns for authors who had published in both OA and traditional non-OA, peer-reviewed, scientific, cytopathology journals. Thirty authors were randomly selected with criteria of publishing a total of at least five cytopathology articles over 2010-2015. Number of citations per article (CPA) (during 2010-2015) for OA publications (in CytoJournal and Journal of Cytology) and non-OA publications (in Diagnostic Cytopathology, Cytopathology, Acta Cytologica, Journal of American of Cytopathology, and Indian Journal of Pathology and Microbiology) was collected and compared statistically using two-tailed Student's -est. The data were collected manually through science citation analysis sites, mostly Google Scholar.

RESULTS

Thirty authors published 579 cytopathology articles in OA and non-OA journals. Average CPA for OA publications was 26.64. This was 11.35 higher than the average CPA) of non-OA conventional with subscription cytopathology journals (74% increase) and 11.76 higher than the average CPA of conventional cytopathology non-OA journal articles with free access (79% increase). These differences were statistically significantly with < 0.05.

CONCLUSION

We observed that the cytopathology publications in the OA journal attained a higher rate of CPA than the publications in the traditional non-OA journals in the field of cytopathology during 2010-2015.

摘要

目的

开放获取(OA)基于一系列原则和实践,通过这些原则和实践,研究成果可在网上免费分发,不受其他获取障碍限制。根据2001年的定义,OA出版物可免费供读者复制或再利用,没有障碍。一些研究报告称OA出版物的被引率较高。在本研究中,我们分析了2010 - 2015年期间在细胞病理学亚专业领域发表文章的作者的OA出版物和传统非OA(有无免费获取)出版物的被引率。

材料与方法

我们观察并比较了在OA和传统非OA、同行评审、科学的细胞病理学期刊上发表文章的作者的被引模式。随机选择30位作者,其标准为在2010 - 2015年期间共发表至少五篇细胞病理学文章。收集了OA出版物(发表于《细胞杂志》和《细胞学杂志》)和非OA出版物(发表于《诊断细胞病理学》《细胞病理学》《细胞学报》《美国细胞病理学杂志》以及《印度病理学与微生物学杂志》)每篇文章的被引次数(2010 - 2015年期间),并使用双尾学生t检验进行统计学比较。数据通过科学引文分析网站(主要是谷歌学术)手动收集。

结果

30位作者在OA和非OA期刊上发表了579篇细胞病理学文章。OA出版物的平均每篇文章被引次数为26.64。这比有订阅的传统非OA细胞病理学期刊的平均每篇文章被引次数高11.35(增长74%),比有免费获取的传统非OA细胞病理学杂志文章的平均每篇文章被引次数高11.76(增长79%)。这些差异具有统计学显著性(P < 0.05)。

结论

我们观察到,在2010 - 2015年期间,细胞病理学领域OA期刊上的出版物比传统非OA期刊上的出版物获得了更高的每篇文章被引率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbd9/8422447/a60b2ddf94b7/Cytojournal-18-20-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验